NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

What Wheeler Army Airfield Tried in 2021

Wheeler Army Airfield held 30 courts-martial in 2021. The median confinement was 1.1 years, compared with 6 months across the Army. 55% of convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge, compared with 70% Army-wide, and 25 of the 30 cases were general courts-martial.

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › By Installation › Wheeler Army Airfield › 2021

Short answer: Wheeler Army Airfield held 30 courts-martial in 2021. The median confinement was 1.1 years, compared with 6 months across the Army. 55% of convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge, compared with 70% Army-wide, and 25 of the 30 cases were general courts-martial.

Based on 30 cases · 2021 · Army records · data updated October 24, 2026

Median Confinement Was 1.1 Years

79% of the 24 convictions included confinement. The median confinement was 1.1 years, compared with a 6-month median for all Army cases. A quarter of the sentences were 2 years or longer. These are adjudged sentences. They are the sentences announced at trial, before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal, and they cover every charge in a case.

10 of 24 convictions (42%) had confinement longer than one year, compared with 26% Army-wide. 29% had confinement of more than 1 year but under 5 years, compared with 18%. 12% had 5 years or more, compared with 8%. Sentences under 6 months were less common: 25% here, compared with 37%.

Adjudged confinementConvictionsShare hereShare, the whole Army docket
No confinement521%19%
Under 6 months625%37%
6 months to 1 year312%17%
More than 1 year, under 5 years729%18%
5 years or more312%8%

Most Cases Were General Courts-Martial

General courts-martial heard 25 of the 30 cases (83%), compared with 73% for all Army cases. A general court-martial can impose any lawful sentence, including long confinement and a dishonorable discharge. A special court-martial can adjudge no more than one year of confinement and no dishonorable discharge.

The accused were more senior than in the Army as a whole. There were 14 junior enlisted members (E-1 to E-4), 14 NCOs (E-5 to E-9), and 2 officers or warrant officers. Across the Army, 58% of the accused were junior enlisted.

Assault and Sexual Assault Charges

29 records list charges. Assault (Article 128) appeared in 12 cases (41%), compared with 38% Army-wide. Rape and sexual assault (Article 120) appeared in 8 cases (28%), compared with 29%. Attempts (Article 80) appeared in 14%, compared with 9%.

Some charges were less common. The general article (Article 134) appeared in 14% of cases, compared with 21%. Drug offenses (Article 112a) appeared in 10%, compared with 12%.

UCMJ ArticleCasesShare hereShare, all Army cases in those years
Art. 128 Assault1241%38%
Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault828%29%
Art. 134 General article414%21%
Art. 80 Attempts414%9%
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation414%16%
Art. 90 Willfully disobeying superior officer310%8%
Art. 112a Wrongful use, possession of controlled substances310%12%
Art. 120b Rape and sexual assault of a child27%8%

Convictions on the Most Common Charges

9 of 12 Article 128 cases ended in a conviction on that article (75%). The median confinement for those convictions was 2.2 years. 4 of 8 Article 120 cases ended in a conviction on that article, with a median of 4.9 years. A case can include a conviction on one article and an acquittal on another, so these rows overlap.

ArticleCases charging itConvicted of it (share)Median confinement when convicted of it
Art. 128 Assault129 (75%)2.2 years
Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault84 (4 of 8)4.9 years

Pleas and Plea Agreements

16 accused pleaded guilty, and 14 contested. A contested case is one with a not-guilty plea to at least one charge. The contested share was 47%, higher than the 36% across the Army.

13 of the 16 guilty pleas are recorded with a plea agreement, and 3 have no entry. Army records show whether there was an agreement, not what it said.

Results in Contested Cases

13 contested cases reached a verdict. 5 ended in a full acquittal (38%), and 6 ended in a partial acquittal (46%). A partial acquittal means not guilty of at least one charge or specification but guilty of another. The full-acquittal rate was slightly higher than the 35% Army-wide.

Army results list findings charge by charge, so partial acquittals are common in Army records.

Who Decided Guilt?

The accused usually chooses whether a military judge alone or a panel of members decides guilt. At Wheeler, a military judge alone heard 22 cases. Members heard 7: 6 enlisted panels and 1 officer panel. That is 24% of cases with the forum listed.

Members heard 7 of 13 contested cases (54%). Most judge-alone cases are guilty pleas, so the overall split mostly follows the number of contested cases.

Punitive Discharges

55% of convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge: 4 bad-conduct discharges and 8 dishonorable discharges. Across the Army, the share was 70%. Neither of the 2 convicted officers or warrant officers was sentenced to dismissal. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation.

Fort Bliss and Fort Carson

Fort Bliss and Fort Carson also held 30 cases each in 2021. At Fort Bliss, 33% of cases were contested, 3 of 10 contested cases with a verdict ended in a full acquittal, the median confinement was 7 months, and the punitive discharge rate was 73%. At Fort Carson, 20% were contested, 1 of 6 ended in a full acquittal, the median was 9 months, and the punitive discharge rate was 86%.

Wheeler had the highest contested share and the longest median confinement of the 3. It had the lowest punitive discharge rate.

InstallationCasesContestedFull acquittals (decided contested)Median confinementPunitive discharge (enlisted)
Wheeler Army Airfield3047%5 of 131.1 years55%
Fort Bliss3033%3 of 107 months73%
Fort Carson3020%1 of 69 months86%

Records and Limits

The services were required to begin publishing trial records under Article 140a by December 2020. Army records in this data are sparse before 2021. Cases resolved by nonjudicial punishment, administrative separation, or no action are not included, and the records do not describe the evidence or the plea terms.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.

How We Counted

Every court-martial tried at Wheeler Army Airfield with a trial date in 2021 (30 cases).

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

Military Judges Who Presided Over Cases at Wheeler Army Airfield, 2021

Names and links only. Each judge's record of pleas, findings, and sentences is on their Know Your Judge page, part of the Court-Martial Characters membership.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top