NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

A Year of Courts-Martial at Camp Humphreys: 2025

Camp Humphreys held 13 courts-martial in 2025, and assault under Article 128 was charged in 7 of them (54%), compared with 19% across the Army. All 11 convictions included confinement. The median confinement was 4 months, compared with 8 months Army-wide.

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 4 min read

Trends › By Installation › Camp Humphreys › 2025

Short answer: Camp Humphreys held 13 courts-martial in 2025, and assault under Article 128 was charged in 7 of them (54%), compared with 19% across the Army. All 11 convictions included confinement. The median confinement was 4 months, compared with 8 months Army-wide.

Based on 13 cases · 2025 · Army records · data updated October 24, 2026

Assault Was the Most Common Charge

All 13 records list the charges. Article 128 (assault) appeared in 7 cases (54%), compared with 19% for all Army cases in 2025. Domestic violence under Article 128b appeared in 4 cases (31%), compared with 26%.

Article 90, willfully disobeying a superior officer, appeared in 2 cases (15%), compared with 6%. Article 134, the general article, also appeared in 15% of cases, less often than the 22% Army-wide.

UCMJ ArticleCasesShare hereShare, all Army cases in those years
Art. 128 Assault754%19%
Art. 128b Domestic violence431%26%
Art. 134 General article215%22%
Art. 90 Willfully disobeying superior officer215%6%
Art. 115 Communicating threats18%2%
Art. 86 AWOL18%3%
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation18%8%

Confinement in Every Conviction

Of 11 convictions, 11 carried confinement. The median confinement was 4 months, shorter than the 8 months for the Army as a whole. Among those sentences, a quarter were 9 months or longer.

These are adjudged sentences, set at trial before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal. Each covers every charge in the case.

Bad-Conduct Discharges

A punitive discharge followed 64% of enlisted convictions. All 7 were bad-conduct discharges, and 0 were dishonorable. Across the Army, the share was 73%.

A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation, which these records do not track.

More Contested Cases Than the Army as a Whole

The accused pleaded guilty in 9 cases and contested 4. A case is contested when the accused pleads not guilty to at least one charge. The contested share was 31%, compared with 20% across the Army. Of the 4 contested cases that reached a verdict, 2 ended in a full acquittal.

A military judge alone decided guilt in 10 of 13 cases (77%). Members heard 3: 2 enlisted panels and 1 officer panel.

Junior Enlisted Members and General Courts-Martial

The accused were 9 junior enlisted members, 3 NCOs, and 1 officer. That group is more junior than the Army as a whole.

General courts-martial made up 9 of the 13 cases (69%), compared with 66% across the Army. A general court-martial can impose any lawful sentence. A special court-martial caps confinement at one year and cannot impose a dishonorable discharge.

Fort Drum and Fort Stewart

Fort Drum and Fort Stewart each tried 20 cases in 2025. Their median confinement was 5 months and 6 months. Their punitive discharge shares for enlisted members were 94% and 100%, both higher than at Camp Humphreys.

Both had fewer contested cases: 15% at Fort Drum and 5% at Fort Stewart.

InstallationCasesContestedFull acquittals (decided contested)Median confinementPunitive discharge (enlisted)
Camp Humphreys1331%2 of 44 months64%
Fort Drum2015%2 of 25 months94%
Fort Stewart205%0 of 16 months100%

Rule Changes and What Is Missing

Since December 28, 2023, special trial counsel, not commanders, decide whether to prosecute covered offenses such as sexual assault, domestic violence, and murder. New sentencing parameters apply when every guilty finding is for an offense after December 27, 2023. The records give trial dates, not offense dates, so they cannot show which rules applied.

The records also do not describe the evidence or the plea terms, and they do not show cases handled by nonjudicial punishment or administrative separation.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.

How We Counted

Every court-martial tried at Camp Humphreys with a trial date in 2025 (13 cases).

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

Military Judges Who Presided Over Cases at Camp Humphreys, 2025

Names and links only. Each judge's record of pleas, findings, and sentences is on their Know Your Judge page, part of the Court-Martial Characters membership.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top