NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

What Kaiserslautern (Europe) Tried in 2024

Kaiserslautern (Europe) had 25 Army courts-martial in 2024. The median confinement after conviction was 9 months, compared with 6 months across the Army.

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › By Installation › Kaiserslautern (Europe) › 2024

Short answer: Kaiserslautern (Europe) had 25 Army courts-martial in 2024. The median confinement after conviction was 9 months, compared with 6 months across the Army. The general article, Article 134, and assault under Article 128 were each charged in 32% of cases, compared with 21% and 23% across the Army.

Based on 25 cases · 2024 · Army records · data updated October 24, 2026

Longer Sentences Than Across the Army

The 25 cases in this data were tried between March 2024 and December 2024. They produced 24 convictions, and confinement was part of 96% of them. The median confinement was 9 months, compared with 6 months for the Army as a whole. A quarter of the sentences were 1.2 years or longer.

Longer sentences were more common. Sentences over one year made up 10 of 24 convictions (42%), compared with 28% across the Army. Sentences from more than 1 year to under 5 years made up 33% of convictions, compared with 21%. Only 1 conviction (4%) included no confinement, compared with 13% across the Army.

These are adjudged sentences: what the court imposed at trial, before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal. Each one reflects all of the charges in the case.

Adjudged confinementConvictionsShare hereShare, the Army as a whole
No confinement14%13%
Under 6 months1042%43%
6 months to 1 year312%15%
More than 1 year, under 5 years833%21%
5 years or more28%7%

Assault and the General Article

Every record lists the charges. Article 128 (assault) and Article 134 (the general article) were each charged in 8 cases, or 32% of all cases. Across the Army, those shares were 23% and 21%.

Some charges common elsewhere were less common here. Article 128b (domestic violence) was charged in 12% of cases, compared with 23% across the Army. Article 120 (rape and sexual assault) was charged in 8%, compared with 15%. Article 107 (false official statements) and Article 115 (communicating threats) were each charged in 2 cases. Each article counts once per case, so a single case can appear in several rows.

UCMJ ArticleCasesShare hereShare, the Army as a whole
Art. 128 Assault832%23%
Art. 134 General article832%21%
Art. 128b Domestic violence312%23%
Art. 107 False official statements28%4%
Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault28%15%
Art. 115 Communicating threats28%4%
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation28%12%
Art. 131b Obstructing justice28%6%

Both of the Most Common Charges Always Ended in Conviction

Both of the most common charges ended in a conviction on the charged article in 8 of 8 cases. The median confinement after an Article 128 conviction was 9 months. For Article 134, the median was 1 year.

A single case can include a conviction on one article and an acquittal on another, so these counts describe each article on its own rather than whole cases.

ArticleCases charging itConvicted of it (share)Median confinement when convicted of it
Art. 128 Assault88 (8 of 8)9 months
Art. 134 General article88 (8 of 8)1 year

Guilty Pleas and Contested Trials

Of 25 accused, 19 pleaded guilty and 6 contested at least one charge, meaning a not-guilty or mixed plea. The contested share was 24%, about the same as the 27% across the Army. All 19 guilty pleas are recorded with a plea agreement, though Army records state only that an agreement existed, not its terms.

Of the 6 decided contested cases, 1 ended in a full acquittal.

Most Enlisted Convictions Included a Punitive Discharge

For enlisted members, a punitive discharge is either a bad-conduct or a dishonorable discharge. Of 23 convicted enlisted members, 20 received one: 17 bad-conduct and 3 dishonorable. That rate, 87%, compares with 72% across the Army.

The 1 convicted officer or warrant officer was dismissed. Dismissal is the officer equivalent. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation.

Mostly General Courts-Martial

Of the 25 cases, 20 were general courts-martial (80%), compared with 72% in all Army cases in 2024. A general court-martial can impose any lawful sentence, including long confinement and a dishonorable discharge. A special court-martial caps confinement at one year and cannot impose a dishonorable discharge.

The accused were 13 junior enlisted members, 11 NCOs, and 1 officer. This rank mix was similar to the Army as a whole.

Who Heard the Cases

The accused usually chooses whether a military judge alone or a panel of members decides guilt. A military judge alone decided 20 of 25 cases (80%), and enlisted panels heard the other 5. There were no officer panels. Most judge-alone cases are guilty pleas, so the split follows how many cases were contested.

Compared With Fort Campbell and Fort Carson

Fort Campbell (27 cases) and Fort Carson (30 cases) tried a similar number of cases. The contested share was lower at Fort Campbell, 15%, and higher at Fort Carson, 33%. Kaiserslautern's median confinement, 9 months, was the longest of the 3, compared with 8 months at Fort Campbell and 4 months at Fort Carson. Its punitive discharge rate, 87%, was between Fort Campbell's 91% and Fort Carson's 77%.

InstallationCasesContestedFull acquittals (decided contested)Median confinementPunitive discharge (enlisted)
Kaiserslautern (Europe)2524%1 of 69 months87%
Fort Campbell2715%2 of 48 months91%
Fort Carson3033%3 of 104 months77%

Rule Changes and What the Records Omit

Since December 28, 2023, special trial counsel, not commanders, decide whether to prosecute covered offenses such as sexual assault, domestic violence, and murder. When every guilty finding is for an offense after December 27, 2023, the military judge sets the sentence within new sentencing parameters. The records do not give offense dates, so 2024 trials mix cases under the old and new rules.

The data covers only what reached a courtroom. It does not include nonjudicial punishment, administrative separation, cases closed with no action, the evidence, or plea terms.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.

How We Counted

Every court-martial tried at Kaiserslautern (Europe) with a trial date in 2024 (25 cases).

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

Military Judges Who Presided Over Cases at Kaiserslautern (Europe), 2024

Names and links only. Each judge's record of pleas, findings, and sentences is on their Know Your Judge page, part of the Court-Martial Characters membership.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top