A Year of Courts-Martial at Fort Sill: 2023
Fort Sill tried 17 courts-martial in 2023. Article 128b (domestic violence) was charged in 41% of cases, compared with 21% across the Army. The contested share was 35%, compared with 31%, and 3 of the 6 contested cases that reached a verdict ended in a full acquittal.
Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 4 min read
Trends › By Installation › Fort Sill › 2023
Short answer: Fort Sill tried 17 courts-martial in 2023. Article 128b (domestic violence) was charged in 41% of cases, compared with 21% across the Army. The contested share was 35%, compared with 31%, and 3 of the 6 contested cases that reached a verdict ended in a full acquittal.
Domestic Violence and the General Article
All 17 records list charges, and one case can appear under several articles. Article 128b (domestic violence) appeared in 7 cases (41%), compared with 21% in the rest of the Army. Article 134 (general article) appeared in 6 cases (35%), compared with 24%.
Article 120c (other sexual misconduct), Article 85 (desertion), and Article 107 (false official statements) each appeared in 2 cases (12%). Across the Army those shares were 3%, 3%, and 4%.
| UCMJ Article | Cases | Share here | Share, the whole Army docket |
|---|---|---|---|
| Art. 128b Domestic violence | 7 | 41% | 21% |
| Art. 134 General article | 6 | 35% | 24% |
| Art. 128 Assault | 4 | 24% | 26% |
| Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault | 2 | 12% | 21% |
| Art. 120c Other sexual misconduct | 2 | 12% | 3% |
| Art. 85 Desertion | 2 | 12% | 3% |
| Art. 120b Rape and sexual assault of a child | 2 | 12% | 8% |
| Art. 107 False official statements | 2 | 12% | 4% |
Contested Cases and Verdicts
In 11 cases the accused pleaded guilty, and 6 were contested, meaning a not-guilty or mixed plea. The contested share, 35%, is higher than the 31% in the rest of the Army. All 11 guilty pleas are recorded with a plea agreement.
Of the 6 contested cases that reached a verdict, 3 ended in a full acquittal.
Confinement
Of the 17 cases, 14 ended in a conviction on at least one charge, and 13 of those sentences included confinement (93%). The median confinement was 6 months, the same as the median in the rest of the Army. A quarter of the sentences that included confinement were 3 years or longer.
These are adjudged sentences, set at trial before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal. Each covers every charge in the case.
Punitive Discharges
Of 14 convicted enlisted members, 10 received a punitive discharge: 6 bad-conduct and 4 dishonorable. The share, 71%, compares with 74% across the Army. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation.
Rank, Court Level, and Forum
By rank, the accused were 12 junior enlisted members and 5 NCOs, with no officers, a more junior group than the Army as a whole.
There were 13 general and 2 special courts-martial, with 2 not listed. The general share, 87%, compares with 76% in the rest of the Army. A special court-martial caps confinement at one year and cannot impose a dishonorable discharge.
A military judge alone decided 13 cases, and enlisted panels heard 3. Members heard 19% of the cases, the same as the 19% in the Army as a whole.
Fort Carson and Fort Benning
Fort Carson tried 20 cases in 2023 and Fort Benning tried 21. Full acquittals in contested cases were 3 of 6 at Fort Sill, 3 of 10 at Fort Carson, and 0 of 4 at Fort Benning. The median confinement was 6 months at Fort Sill and Fort Carson and 5 months at Fort Benning.
| Installation | Cases | Contested | Full acquittals (decided contested) | Median confinement | Punitive discharge (enlisted) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fort Sill | 17 | 35% | 3 of 6 | 6 months | 71% |
| Fort Carson | 20 | 50% | 3 of 10 | 6 months | 94% |
| Fort Benning | 21 | 19% | 0 of 4 | 5 months | 70% |
Outside These Records
Only cases that reached a courtroom appear here. Nonjudicial punishment, administrative separation, and cases closed without action are not included. The records do not describe the evidence or the plea terms.
Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.
How We Counted
Every court-martial tried at Fort Sill with a trial date in 2023 (17 cases).
Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.
Related Analysis
- Fort Sill: Court-Martial Data and Trends (hub)
- By Year (hub)
- What Was Tried at Fort Sill, 2021–2023? 37 Courts-Martial (the whole period)
- A Year of Courts-Martial at Camp Humphreys: 2024
- A Year of Courts-Martial at Camp Humphreys: 2025
- A Year of Courts-Martial at Fort Benning: 2022
- A Year of Courts-Martial at Fort Benning: 2023
- A Year of Courts-Martial at Fort Benning: 2025
- A Year of Courts-Martial at Fort Bliss: 2023
- Search every case in Military Trial Results (members)
Military Judges Who Presided Over Cases at Fort Sill, 2023
- Jacqueline L. Emanuel
- Scott Z. Hughes
- Dasean A. Jones
- Maureen A. Kohn
- Joseph T. Marcee
- Daniel L. Mazzone
- Scott A. Oravec
- Tiffany D. Pond
Names and links only. Each judge's record of pleas, findings, and sentences is on their Know Your Judge page, part of the Court-Martial Characters membership.
About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.