NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

Inside 17 Courts-Martial at Fort Lee, 2020–2023

The records hold 17 courts-martial at Fort Lee from 2020 to 2023. 14 of the accused were NCOs, and 4 of the 6 contested cases that reached a verdict ended in a full acquittal. 60% of convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge, compared with 73% across the Army.

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 5 min read

Trends › By Installation › Fort Lee › 2020–2023

Short answer: The records hold 17 courts-martial at Fort Lee from 2020 to 2023. 14 of the accused were NCOs, and 4 of the 6 contested cases that reached a verdict ended in a full acquittal. 60% of convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge, compared with 73% across the Army.

Based on 17 cases · 2020–2023 · Army records · data updated October 24, 2026

Mostly NCOs

14 accused were NCOs (E-5 to E-9), 3 were junior enlisted (E-1 to E-4), and none were officers. Across the Army, 57% of the accused were junior enlisted, so this group is more senior.

12 of the 17 cases were general courts-martial (71%), compared with 75% in the rest of the Army. A general court-martial can impose long confinement and a dishonorable discharge. A special court-martial caps confinement at one year and cannot impose a dishonorable discharge.

Contested Cases and Full Acquittals

7 accused contested at least one charge and 10 pleaded guilty. The contested share was 41%, higher than the 35% Army-wide. Of the 6 contested cases that reached a verdict, 4 ended in a full acquittal.

7 of the 10 guilty pleas are recorded with a plea agreement, and 3 have no entry. Army records say whether an agreement existed, not what it contained.

Shorter Confinement

Of 10 convictions, 9 included confinement. The median was 3 months, shorter than the 6 months across the Army, and a quarter of the terms were 11 months or longer. These are adjudged sentences, set at trial before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal, and each covers all the charges in the case.

A punitive discharge followed 60% of enlisted convictions: 5 bad-conduct discharges and 1 dishonorable discharge. The Army rate was 73%. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation.

Property, Larceny, and Domestic Violence Charges

14 of the 17 records list charges. Article 128 (assault) appears in 5 cases (36%), compared with 31% across the Army. Article 92 (failure to obey an order or regulation), Article 109 (waste, spoilage, or destruction of property other than military property), and Article 128b (domestic violence) each appear in 4 (29%).

The Army shares for those articles were 15%, 2%, and 13%. Article 121 (larceny) and Article 131b (obstructing justice) each appear in 3 cases (21%), compared with 7% and 4%. Article 134 appears in 3 and Article 80 (attempts) in 2. A case counts under every article it charges.

UCMJ ArticleCasesShare hereShare, all Army cases in those years
Art. 128 Assault536%31%
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation429%15%
Art. 109 Property other than military; waste, spoilage, destruction429%2%
Art. 128b Domestic violence429%13%
Art. 134 General article321%22%
Art. 131b Obstructing justice321%4%
Art. 121 Larceny321%7%
Art. 80 Attempts214%8%

Who Decided Guilt?

A military judge alone decided 13 cases. Enlisted panels decided 4, and no officer panel sat. Members heard 24% of the cases with a forum listed.

Fort Lee, Fort McNair, and Fort Sam Houston

Fort McNair tried 21 cases and Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston tried 22 in these years. Fort Sam Houston had the same 3-month median confinement and the same 41% contested share as Fort Lee. Fort McNair had a median of 1 year. Their punitive discharge rates were 80% and 92%.

InstallationCasesContestedFull acquittals (decided contested)Median confinementPunitive discharge (enlisted)
Fort Lee1741%4 of 63 months60%
Fort McNair2129%1 of 41 year80%
Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston2241%6 of 93 months92%

Dates and Gaps in the Records

The trials ran from November 2020 to February 2023: 3 in 2020, 6 in 2021, 7 in 2022, and 1 in 2023. They are 1% of the 1,581 Army courts-martial in those years. Army records in this data are sparse before 2021.

The records give trial dates, not offense dates. They do not describe the evidence or plea terms, and they leave out nonjudicial punishment and administrative separations.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.

How We Counted

Every court-martial in the data tried at Fort Lee with a trial date in 2020–2023 (17 cases), compared with all 1,581 Army trials in those years. Dates are trial dates.

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

Military Judges Who Presided Over Cases at Fort Lee, 2020–2023

Names and links only. Each judge's record of pleas, findings, and sentences is on their Know Your Judge page, part of the Court-Martial Characters membership.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top