What Was Tried at Fort Leavenworth, 2020–2023? 14 Courts-Martial
Fort Leavenworth had 14 courts-martial in the records from 2020 to 2023. Article 128 (assault) was charged in 69% of the cases with charges listed, compared with 31% across the Army. Every conviction included confinement, and the median term was 1 year, compared with 6 months Army-wide.
Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 5 min read
Trends › By Installation › Fort Leavenworth › 2020–2023
Short answer: Fort Leavenworth had 14 courts-martial in the records from 2020 to 2023. Article 128 (assault) was charged in 69% of the cases with charges listed, compared with 31% across the Army. Every conviction included confinement, and the median term was 1 year, compared with 6 months Army-wide.
Assault Charges in Most Cases
13 of the 14 records list charges. Article 128 (assault) appears in 9 of them (69%). Across all Army cases in those years, the share was 31%.
Article 120 (rape and sexual assault) appears in 3 cases (23%), about the same as the 25% Army share. Each of the following appears in 1 case (8%): Article 131b (obstructing justice), Article 92 (failure to obey an order or regulation), Article 108 (military property loss, damage, or destruction), Article 115 (malingering before 2019, communicating threats since), Article 113 (misbehavior of a sentinel before 2019, drunken or reckless driving since), and Article 134 (the general article).
| UCMJ Article | Cases | Share here | Share, the Army as a whole |
|---|---|---|---|
| Art. 128 Assault | 9 | 69% | 31% |
| Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault | 3 | 23% | 25% |
| Art. 131b Obstructing justice | 1 | 8% | 4% |
| Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation | 1 | 8% | 15% |
| Art. 108 Military property; loss, damage, destruction | 1 | 8% | 1% |
| Art. 115 Malingering before 2019, communicating threats since | 1 | 8% | 5% |
| Art. 113 Misbehavior of a sentinel before 2019, drunken or reckless driving since | 1 | 8% | 3% |
| Art. 134 General article | 1 | 8% | 22% |
Confinement in Every Conviction
Of 12 convictions, 12 included confinement. The median term was 1 year, longer than the 6 months across the Army. A quarter of the terms were 4 years or longer.
Each term is an adjudged sentence, set at trial before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal. It covers every charge in its case.
General Courts-Martial in 13 of 14 Cases
13 of the 14 cases were general courts-martial (93%). A general court-martial can impose long confinement and a dishonorable discharge. The other case was a special court-martial, which caps confinement at one year.
Punitive Discharges
4 of 10 convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge: 1 bad-conduct discharge and 3 dishonorable discharges. Across all Army cases in those years, the rate was 73%.
2 convicted officers appear here, and 1 was dismissed. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation.
Guilty Pleas and Judge-Alone Trials
12 accused pleaded guilty and 2 contested at least one charge. The contested share was 14%, compared with 35% across the Army. 1 of the 2 contested cases that reached a verdict ended in a full acquittal.
9 of the 12 guilty pleas are recorded with a plea agreement, and 3 have no entry. Army records show whether an agreement existed, not what it said. A military judge alone decided all 14 cases. No panel of members heard a case.
Rank and Comparable Installations
By rank, the accused were 6 junior enlisted members, 6 NCOs, and 2 officers, a group more senior than the Army as a whole.
Fort McNair tried 21 cases and Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston tried 22 in these years. Fort McNair had the same 1-year median confinement, and Fort Sam Houston had 3 months. Their punitive discharge rates for enlisted convictions were 80% and 92%, both higher than the 40% at Fort Leavenworth.
| Installation | Cases | Contested | Full acquittals (decided contested) | Median confinement | Punitive discharge (enlisted) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fort Leavenworth | 14 | 14% | 1 of 2 | 1 year | 40% |
| Fort McNair | 21 | 29% | 1 of 4 | 1 year | 80% |
| Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston | 22 | 41% | 6 of 9 | 3 months | 92% |
Timeline and Record Limits
The trials ran from May 2020 to August 2023: 2 in 2020, 5 in 2021, 2 in 2022, and 5 in 2023. They are 1% of the 1,581 Army courts-martial in those years. Army records in this data are sparse before 2021.
Only what reached a courtroom is here. Nonjudicial punishment, administrative separation, the evidence, and plea terms do not appear in these records.
Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.
How We Counted
Every court-martial in the data tried at Fort Leavenworth with a trial date in 2020–2023 (14 cases), compared with all 1,581 Army trials in those years. Dates are trial dates.
Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.
Related Analysis
- Fort Leavenworth: Court-Martial Data and Trends (hub)
- Army Courts-Martial: Data and Trends (hub)
- By Installation (hub)
- Fort Leavenworth Courts-Martial, 2024–2026: What 20 Cases Show (another period)
- What Was Tried at Central Command (CENTCOM), 2020–2023? 13 Courts-Martial (same years, similar size)
- Inside 17 Courts-Martial at Fort Lee, 2020–2023 (same years, similar size)
- Camp Humphreys, 2020–2023: Charges, Verdicts, and Sentences in 69 Cases
- Fort Bliss, 2020–2023: Charges, Verdicts, and Sentences in 102 Cases
- Fort Bragg Courts-Martial, 2020–2023: What 143 Cases Show
- Fort Carson, 2024–2026: Charges, Verdicts, and Sentences in 45 Cases
- Search every case in Military Trial Results (members)
Military Judges Who Presided Over Cases at Fort Leavenworth, 2020–2023
Names and links only. Each judge's record of pleas, findings, and sentences is on their Know Your Judge page, part of the Court-Martial Characters membership.
About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.