NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

Federal Firearms Sentences in the Central District of California, FY2016–2025

The median prison term for firearms offenses in the Central District of California was 33 months (2.8 years) among the 867 people (93%) sent to prison. In fiscal years 2016 to 2025, 933 people were sentenced in this offense type. The median for all 94 districts was 42 months.

· Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › Federal Prosecution Analysis › Federal Sentences in the Central District of California, FY2 › Firearms: Central District of California

In brief: The median prison term for firearms offenses in the Central District of California was 33 months (2.8 years) among the 867 people (93%) sent to prison. In fiscal years 2016 to 2025, 933 people were sentenced in this offense type. The median for all 94 districts was 42 months.

Updated November 4, 2026 · Sources: U.S. Sentencing Commission and Federal Judicial Center, fiscal years 2016–2025

This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 933 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. It is part of the Federal Prosecution Analysis series, which builds on Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System. How the numbers were built: How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built.

The Median Prison Term

The U.S. Sentencing Commission recorded 933 people sentenced for firearms offenses in this district. Of those, 867 (93%) received a prison term and 40 (4%) received probation only.

The median prison term was 33 months. A quarter received 51 months or more, and a quarter received 19.5 months or less. For all districts, 94% of 78,851 people were sent to prison, and the median was 42 months. For all offenses in this district, the median was 37 months.

Criminal History

Criminal history category is a score the guidelines use for a person's prior record. In this offense type, 17% of the people were in the lowest category and 33% were in the highest. Court-martial records have no criminal history field, so there is no military counterpart.

Firearms cases were 9% of the 9,958 people sentenced in the district over the period.

Guideline Range Position

Of 929 people with the information, 34% (312) were sentenced within the guideline range. Another 45% (418) were below it without a government request, and 20% (182) were below it at the government's request. Above the range were 2% (17).

Within-range sentences were 52% for this offense type in all districts and 29% for all offenses in this district. The share here was lower than the all-district share and higher than the district's all-offense share.

Pleas, Trials, and Mandatory Minimums

Guilty pleas accounted for 885 of 933 cases (95%), and 48 people were convicted after a trial. For all districts the share was 97%, and for all offenses in this district it was 95%.

The median prison term was 33 months after a guilty plea and 46 months after a trial, based on 46 people at trial. Among the guilty pleas, 81% had a written plea agreement and 18% were straight pleas.

A mandatory minimum prison term applied to 31 of the 927 people with that information recorded (3%).

Guidelines, Supervised Release, and Fines

The most common primary guideline was §2K2.1 (Unlawful Receipt, Possession, or Transportation of Firearms or Ammunition), with 912 people. A further 6 people were sentenced under §2K1.3 (Unlawful Receipt, Possession, or Transportation of Explosive Materials), and 1 under §2X3.1 (Accessory After the Fact).

Supervised release after prison was ordered for 864 people (93%), with a median term of 36 months. A fine was ordered for 48 (5%), and restitution for 34 (4%).

Counts and Medians by Fiscal Year

The district sentenced 298 people in fiscal years 2016 to 2019 and 635 in fiscal years 2020 to 2025. The fiscal year runs from October 1 through the end of September.

Yearly counts in the table range from 40 in 2016 to 138 in 2022. Yearly medians range from 24 months to 37 months. The records do not show why the counts or medians differ from year to year.

Fiscal yearPeople sentencedMedian prisonPleaded guilty
20164036 months95%
20179037 months88%
20189032 months93%
20197834 months92%
20209024 months94%
20218032 months100%
202213836.5 months94%
202311734.5 months98%
202410633 months97%
202510433 months95%

What the Records Do Not Show

Only people who were convicted and sentenced are counted. Acquittals and dismissals are not in the data, and the records do not describe the weapon or the conduct in each case.

Courts-martial are tried in military courts, not in this federal district court. These figures describe federal cases only.

How We Counted

Everyone sentenced in federal court in the Central District of California (U.S. Sentencing Commission district label "California Central") in fiscal years 2016 to 2025 whose offense type was "Firearms" (933). Offense types are the Commission's OFFGUIDE categories.

Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records.

What to Keep in Mind

No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct. Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served.

Federal supervised release. Most federal prison sentences are followed by a term of supervised release that the judge sets as part of the sentence. A person who violates it can be sent back to prison. A court-martial cannot sentence anyone to supervision after release. Military parole and mandatory supervised release are decided later by a board, not by the judge at trial.

Who decides the sentence, and under what rules. Federal judges sentence every federal case. They must calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, which is advisory, and must impose any mandatory minimum the statute requires unless an exception applies. In courts-martial, the accused could choose sentencing by members until the rules changed. For cases in which every guilty finding is for an offense committed after December 27, 2023, a military judge sentences alone, within sentencing parameters. Courts-martial tried in 2024 and later include both old-rule and new-rule cases, and the data cannot tell them apart.

Time periods. Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually.

How life sentences and "time served" are counted. In the federal numbers, a life sentence is counted as 470 months, and any other sentence longer than 470 months is counted as just under 470 months. A sentence of "time served" is counted as one day (0.03 months). Averages are affected by these rules; medians much less.

Mandatory minimum sentences. Many federal statutes on drugs, images of child exploitation, child sex abuse, and firearms carry mandatory minimum prison terms. The UCMJ has mandatory minimums only for a few offenses (a dishonorable discharge or dismissal for rape and sexual assault, and life for premeditated murder). Federal sentences for these offenses are partly set by Congress, not by the judge.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top