Producing Child Pornography Convictions of NCOs (E-5 to E-9): Courts-Martial Compared With Federal Court
Courts-martial convicted 24 NCOs (E-5 to E-9) of producing child pornography (images of child exploitation) with trial dates from 2016 to 2025. The median adjudged confinement was 95.9 months, a little higher than the 89.9 months for all ranks. The median federal prison term for 5,806 people sentenc
Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 9 min read
Trends › Federal Prosecution Analysis › Producing Child Pornography › Producing Child Pornography: NCOs
In brief: Courts-martial convicted 24 NCOs (E-5 to E-9) of producing child pornography (images of child exploitation) with trial dates from 2016 to 2025. The median adjudged confinement was 95.9 months, a little higher than the 89.9 months for all ranks. The median federal prison term for 5,806 people sentenced under the production guideline was 246 months.
This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 5,806 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal years 2016 to 2025, compared with court-martial results from this site's Military Trial Results data (updated November 2, 2026). Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. It is part of the Federal Prosecution Analysis series, which builds on Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System. How the numbers were built: How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built.
Sentences Given to NCOs at Courts-Martial
The NCO group has 24 convictions: 5 in the Army, 6 in the Air Force, 7 in the Navy, and 6 in the Marine Corps. All 24 were tried at a general court-martial.
In 23 of the 24 convictions (96%), the sentence included confinement. The median adjudged confinement was 95.9 months, or 8 years. A quarter of the sentences were 299.8 months or more.
| Courts-martial: NCOs (E-5 to E-9) | Federal court, FY2016–FY2025 | |
|---|---|---|
| Convictions or people sentenced | 24 | 5,806 |
| Sentenced to confinement or prison | 96% | more than 99% |
| Median confinement or prison | 95.9 months | 246 months |
| A quarter received this or more | 299.8 months | 360 months |
| Pleaded guilty | 19 of 22 with a plea recorded (86%) | 94% |
| Mandatory minimum applied | See the caveats | 94% |
Discharges
Of the 24 enlisted members convicted, 22 (92%) received a punitive discharge. There were 19 dishonorable discharges and 3 bad-conduct discharges.
The records do not show why the remaining NCO did not receive a punitive discharge, such as a different sentence or a pretrial agreement.
Sentences Before and After 2020
For trials in 2016 to 2019, the median confinement was 101.9 months, from 4 cases with confinement. For trials in 2020 to 2025, it was 95.9 months, from 19 cases.
The later median is close to the earlier one. The NCO sentences show little change between the periods, though the earlier period has few cases.
Pleas Among NCOs
A plea is recorded for 22 of the 24 convictions, and 19 (86%) were guilty pleas. After a guilty plea, the median confinement was 119.9 months, from 18 cases with confinement.
In contested cases that ended in conviction, the median was 95.9 months, from 3 cases with confinement. The contested group is too small to support a general conclusion. The guilty plea median was higher than the contested median.
Comparison With All Ranks and With Federal Court
For all ranks, the records list 58 convictions, a median confinement of 89.9 months, and confinement in 97%. The NCO median of 95.9 months was higher than that.
Federal records do not record rank. The federal group is 5,806 people sentenced under guideline §2G2.1, which covers production under 18 U.S.C. 2251, and 5,794 of them received a prison term.
The Federal Numbers in Full
The median federal prison term was 246 months, or 20.5 years. The upper quarter received 360 months or more, and the lower quarter received 180 months or less. A life sentence went to 87 people.
In federal court, 5,439 people (94%) pleaded guilty and 367 were convicted after a trial. The median term was 240 months after a plea and 370 months after a trial.
The NCO median was lower than the federal median. The NCO upper quarter, 299.8 months, was also lower than the federal 360 months.
Limits on What This Shows
Rank in the court-martial record is the rank at trial. It does not show years of service or duties, so the records cannot explain differences between rank groups.
Court-martial sentences are as adjudged, before clemency or appeal, and federal terms are terms imposed, not time served. The facts of each case are not in either data set, and criminal history is recorded only on the federal side.
How We Counted
Courts-martial with trial dates in 2016 to 2025 ending in a conviction for producing child pornography (images of child exploitation) where the accused was an NCO (e-5 to e-9) (24). Federal: 5,806 people sentenced under primary sentencing guideline §2G2.1 (production; 18 U.S.C. 2251) (U.S. Sentencing Commission). Federal records have no rank; criminal history is the nearest federal measure of record, and courts-martial have no criminal history field.
Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records.
What to Keep in Mind
Who is in each set of numbers. The federal sentencing numbers come from the U.S. Sentencing Commission. They count only people who were convicted and sentenced in federal district court. People whose cases were dismissed or who were acquitted are not in them. The military numbers come from court-martial results, which include acquittals. To compare acquittal or dismissal rates, the federal side uses a different source: the Federal Judicial Center's case data, which counts every defendant whose case ended.
Different cases reach each system. Federal prosecutors bring a narrow set of cases. In fiscal year 2024, immigration and drug trafficking cases were 59% of everyone sentenced in federal court (36,664 of 61,678). Many crimes that the military prosecutes, such as most assaults, most sexual assaults between adults, and drug use, are usually state crimes for civilians and reach federal court only in special situations, such as on federal land or in Indian Country. A federal case and a court-martial for the same crime can involve different kinds of facts.
Time periods. Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually.
Offense categories do not line up exactly. Each comparison uses a federal offense group chosen to match the military article as closely as possible (see the crosswalk). Some matches are close; others are partial. The post says which federal guideline or statute was used and why it is not an exact match.
Mandatory minimum sentences. Many federal statutes on drugs, images of child exploitation, child sex abuse, and firearms carry mandatory minimum prison terms. The UCMJ has mandatory minimums only for a few offenses (a dishonorable discharge or dismissal for rape and sexual assault, and life for premeditated murder). Federal sentences for these offenses are partly set by Congress, not by the judge.
No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct. Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served.
Military confinement credit and parole. For military sentences adjudged after 2004, good conduct time is 5 days for each month of confinement, about 16%. Military prisoners can also earn up to 8 more days a month for work and programs and up to 2 days a month for special acts, with a limit of 15 days a month in total. Military prisoners can be considered for parole by their service's clemency and parole board. The military numbers in this post are the confinement adjudged at trial, not the time served.
Military sentences include punishments federal sentences do not. A court-martial sentence can include a punitive discharge (bad-conduct discharge, dishonorable discharge, or dismissal for officers), reduction in rank, and forfeiture of pay. These have no federal counterpart. A comparison of months of confinement leaves them out. A short confinement term combined with a dishonorable discharge is a heavier sentence than the months alone show.
Federal supervised release. Most federal prison sentences are followed by a term of supervised release that the judge sets as part of the sentence. A person who violates it can be sent back to prison. A court-martial cannot sentence anyone to supervision after release. Military parole and mandatory supervised release are decided later by a board, not by the judge at trial.
Who decides the sentence, and under what rules. Federal judges sentence every federal case. They must calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, which is advisory, and must impose any mandatory minimum the statute requires unless an exception applies. In courts-martial, the accused could choose sentencing by members until the rules changed. For cases in which every guilty finding is for an offense committed after December 27, 2023, a military judge sentences alone, within sentencing parameters. Courts-martial tried in 2024 and later include both old-rule and new-rule cases, and the data cannot tell them apart.
How life sentences and "time served" are counted. In the federal numbers, a life sentence is counted as 470 months, and any other sentence longer than 470 months is counted as just under 470 months. A sentence of "time served" is counted as one day (0.03 months). Averages are affected by these rules; medians much less.
Related Analysis
- Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System (the background article)
- Federal Prosecution Analysis (all federal posts)
- How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built (sources and method)
- Producing Child Pornography: Federal vs. Court-Martial Sentences, 2016–2025 (overview)
- Producing Child Pornography Convictions of Junior Enlisted (E-1 to E-4): Courts-Martial Compared With Federal Court
- Producing Child Pornography Sentences Since the 2023 Military Sentencing Reform: What the Data Shows So Far
- Guilty Pleas in Producing Child Pornography Cases: Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial
- Producing Child Pornography: Federal Sentences vs. Air Force Courts-Martial, 2016–2025
- Producing Child Pornography: Federal Sentences vs. Army Courts-Martial
- Producing Child Pornography: Federal Sentences vs. Marine Corps Courts-Martial
- Are Courts-Martial More Likely to End in Acquittal Than Federal Trials? (related comparison)
- Guilty Pleas in Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial, Year by Year (related comparison)
- Child Pornography Sentences: Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial, 2016–2025 (related comparison)
- Federal Law Has No Crime of Drug Use: How Article 112a Cases Compare (related comparison)
- Drug Distribution and Importation: Federal vs. Court-Martial Sentences, 2016–2025 (related comparison)
- Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Federal Cases vs. Article 120 Courts-Martial (related comparison)
- Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement: Federal Cases vs. Article 120b Courts-Martial (related comparison)
- Theft and Fraud by Dollar Loss: Federal Sentences vs. Article 121 Courts-Martial (related comparison)
- Fewer or More? General Article Charges at Army Courts-Martial, 2021–2025 (court-martial data)
- What Sentence Follows an Army General Article Conviction? (court-martial data)
- Fighting an Army General Article Charge: How Contested Cases Ended (court-martial data)
- Guilty Pleas in Army General Article Cases: How Often, and What Came Next (court-martial data)
- Air Force Article 134 Cases by the Numbers, 2016–2025 (court-martial data)
- What Sentence Follows an Air Force General Article Conviction? (court-martial data)
- Guilty Pleas in Air Force General Article Cases: How Often, and What Came Next (court-martial data)
- Is Navy-Marine Corps General Article Prosecution Rising or Falling? Article 134, 2017–2025 (court-martial data)
- What Sentence Follows a Navy-Marine Corps General Article Conviction? (court-martial data)
- Not Guilty Pleas in Navy-Marine Corps Article 134 Cases: What Happened at Trial (court-martial data)
- When Navy-Marine Corps Accused Plead Guilty to General Article (court-martial data)
- Article 134 (General Article): Court-Martial Data and Trends (court-martial data)
- Article 134 UCMJ: The General Article (law firm reference page)
- U.S. Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles (source)
- Federal Judicial Center, Integrated Database (criminal defendants) (source)
About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.