What Sentence Follows an Air Force General Article Conviction?
Across 486 Air Force convictions under Article 134 (general article) from 2016–2025, the median adjudged confinement was 1.1 years, compared with 4 months in all Air Force convictions. A punitive discharge followed 76% of enlisted convictions, compared with 56%.
Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read
Trends › By Offense › Article 134 › What Sentence Follows a Air Force genera
Short answer: Across 486 Air Force convictions under Article 134 (general article) from 2016–2025, the median adjudged confinement was 1.1 years, compared with 4 months in all Air Force convictions. A punitive discharge followed 76% of enlisted convictions, compared with 56%. Dishonorable discharges were more common than bad-conduct discharges.
Article 134 Convictions Carried Longer Confinement
This page covers only cases that ended in a conviction under Article 134, the general article. Of the 486 convictions, 441 included confinement. The median confinement was 1.1 years, longer than the 4 months for all Air Force convictions in the same years. A quarter of the sentences were 3 years or longer, and 1 was a life sentence.
These are adjudged sentences, as announced at trial before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal. Each sentence covers every charge in the case, not only the Article 134 specification.
Confinement by Length
Sentences longer than one year came in 225 of 486 convictions (46%), compared with 23% across Air Force convictions. Sentences of more than 1 year but under 5 years made up 33% of convictions here, compared with 16% across the Air Force. Sentences of 5 years or more made up 13%, compared with 7%.
Short sentences were less common. Sentences under 6 months made up 27% of convictions here, compared with 48% across the Air Force. No confinement was imposed in 9%, compared with 15%.
| Adjudged confinement | Convictions | Share here | Share, all Air Force convictions in those years |
|---|---|---|---|
| No confinement | 45 | 9% | 15% |
| Under 6 months | 130 | 27% | 48% |
| 6 months to 1 year | 86 | 18% | 15% |
| More than 1 year, under 5 years | 160 | 33% | 16% |
| 5 years or more | 65 | 13% | 7% |
More Dishonorable Than Bad-Conduct Discharges
A punitive discharge followed 76% of enlisted convictions, compared with 56% in all Air Force convictions. Of those discharges, 190 were dishonorable and 146 were bad-conduct. A dishonorable discharge is the more severe kind, and only a general court-martial can impose it.
Of 42 convicted officers or warrant officers, 34 were dismissed. A dismissal is the officer equivalent of a punitive discharge. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation.
What Else Was Charged
Article 134 was the only charge in 152 of the 486 cases. The most common companion charges were Article 112a (drug) in 83 cases, Article 92 (orders violation) in 82, Article 128 (assault) in 71, Article 120b (child sexual abuse) in 63, and Article 120 (sexual assault) in 31.
One sentence covers all charges in a case. The confinement figures on this page therefore reflect the companion charges as well as Article 134.
Sentences by Court Level
General courts-martial produced 356 of these convictions (73%), and special courts-martial produced 130. At general courts-martial, the median confinement was 1.6 years, and 28% of cases were contested. At special courts-martial, the median was 3 months, and 12% were contested.
A general court-martial can impose any lawful sentence, including long confinement and a dishonorable discharge. A special court-martial caps confinement at one year and cannot impose a dishonorable discharge.
Pleas and Who Decided Guilt
Only 217 of the 486 records list a plea, and Air Force records from 2016 to 2019 rarely list a guilty plea. Among the records that list one, 163 accused pleaded guilty and 54 contested at least one charge. The contested share was 25%, compared with 31% in all Air Force convictions.
A partial acquittal is a finding of not guilty on at least one charge or specification and guilty on another. 18 of the 54 contested cases ended in a partial acquittal (33%).
A military judge alone decided guilt in 379 cases, officer panels in 60, and enlisted panels in 42. Members heard 21% of cases, compared with 28% across Air Force convictions. Among contested cases, members heard 34 of 54 (63%). The accused usually chooses the forum, and most judge-alone cases are guilty pleas.
Rank, Installations, and Years
Junior enlisted members (E-1 to E-4) made up 59% of the convicted accused, NCOs 33%, and officers 9%. Across all Air Force convictions, junior enlisted members made up 66%, so this group was more senior.
Kadena AB, Japan, had the most cases (17). Next were Nellis AFB, Nevada (16), Minot AFB, North Dakota (15), JB McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey (14), and Davis-Monthan AFB, Arizona (13). Together they account for 15% of the total.
By year, the counts were 53 in 2016, 61 in 2017, 77 in 2018, 61 in 2019, 40 in 2020, 39 in 2021, 41 in 2022, 29 in 2023, 43 in 2024, and 42 in 2025.
Why There Is No Acquittal Rate Here
Air Force records rarely list the charges in a case that ends in a full acquittal. An acquittal rate for a single offense would therefore undercount acquittals, so this page does not report one. The Air Force posts that cover all offenses do report acquittals.
Law Changes and Record Gaps
The Military Justice Act of 2016 took effect on January 1, 2019. Since December 28, 2023, special trial counsel decide whether to prosecute covered offenses. New sentencing parameters apply to offenses after December 27, 2023.
The records give trial dates, not offense dates. They cannot show which rules applied or whether either change affected these sentences. They also do not include nonjudicial punishment, administrative separations, the evidence, or plea agreements, which Air Force records never report.
For what the offense covers and how it is defended, see Article 134 on the law firm's website. Dates and sources for the law changes: UCMJ change timeline.
How We Counted
Air Force courts-martial tried 2016–2025: ending in a conviction under Article 134 (general article) (486 cases), compared with all Air Force convictions in those years.
Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.
Related Analysis
- Article 134 (General Article): Court-Martial Data and Trends (hub)
- Sentences (hub)
- Air Force Article 134 Cases by the Numbers, 2016–2025
- Guilty Pleas in Air Force General Article Cases: How Often, and What Came Next
- What Sentence Follows an Army General Article Conviction? (another service)
- What Sentence Follows a Navy-Marine Corps General Article Conviction? (another service)
- Article 118 Sentences in the Air Force: Confinement and Discharges, 2016–2025
- Article 134 explained on the law firm's website
- Search every case in Military Trial Results (members)
About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.