NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

What San Diego, California Tried in 2022

San Diego, California held 27 courts-martial in 2022, and 59% were contested, compared with 33% across the Navy and Marine Corps. Article 117a, covering the wrongful broadcast of intimate visual images, was charged in 19% of cases, compared with 2% service-wide.

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › By Installation › San Diego, California › 2022

Short answer: San Diego, California held 27 courts-martial in 2022, and 59% were contested, compared with 33% across the Navy and Marine Corps. Article 117a, covering the wrongful broadcast of intimate visual images, was charged in 19% of cases, compared with 2% service-wide. No conviction carried 5 years or more of confinement.

Based on 27 cases · 2022 · Navy and Marine Corps records · data updated October 24, 2026

Most of the Accused Contested the Charges

Only 11 of the 27 accused pleaded guilty. The other 16 contested at least one charge with a not-guilty or mixed plea, so the government had to prove its case at trial. That 59% contested share was much higher than the 33% for the Navy and Marine Corps in 2022.

In 2021, San Diego's contested share was 38%. The records do not say why more of the accused contested, and they do not describe the evidence in any case.

Few Contested Cases Ended in Full Acquittal

Of the 16 contested cases that reached a verdict, 2 ended in a full acquittal, meaning not guilty of every charge. That is a full-acquittal rate of 12%. The whole Navy and Marine Corps docket had a rate of 20%.

Partial acquittals were more common. In 6 cases the accused was found not guilty of at least one charge but guilty of another. In those cases, the trial reduced the charges but did not end in a full acquittal.

Charges Were Different From the Service

All 27 records list the charges. Orders violations under Article 92 were the most common charge, in 7 cases (26%), compared with 18% service-wide. The general article, Article 134, was next, at 22%, compared with 20%.

Article 117a had the largest difference: 5 cases, or 19%, charged the wrongful broadcast of intimate visual images, compared with 2% across the Navy and Marine Corps. Larceny under Article 121 was 15%, compared with 7%. Assault under Article 128 was charged in 19% of cases, lower than the 23% elsewhere. Drug cases under Article 112a were 19%, compared with 22%.

UCMJ ArticleCasesShare hereShare, Navy and Marine Corps-wide
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation726%18%
Art. 134 General article622%20%
Art. 112a Wrongful use, possession of controlled substances519%22%
Art. 117a Wrongful broadcast of intimate visual images519%2%
Art. 128 Assault519%23%
Art. 121 Larceny415%7%
Art. 131b Obstructing justice27%5%
Art. 86 AWOL27%6%

Sentences Were Short

Of 25 cases with a conviction on at least one charge, 17 included confinement (68%). The median confinement was 5 months, about the same as the 6 months for the Navy and Marine Corps as a whole. A quarter of confinement sentences were 8 months or longer. These are adjudged sentences, announced at trial before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal.

32% of convictions here had no confinement, compared with 17% service-wide. Confinement under 6 months was 40%, compared with 38%. Confinement of 6 months to 1 year was 24%, compared with 25%. Only 1 of 25 convictions (4%) was longer than one year, compared with 20%. No sentence was 5 years or more.

Adjudged confinementConvictionsShare hereShare, the Navy and Marine Corps as a whole
No confinement832%17%
Under 6 months1040%38%
6 months to 1 year624%25%
More than 1 year, under 5 years14%16%
5 years or more00%4%

Bad-Conduct Discharges Only

Of 25 convicted enlisted members, 11 received a punitive discharge (44%). All of those were bad-conduct discharges, not dishonorable discharges. The rest of the Navy and Marine Corps had a rate of 64%.

A special or a general court-martial can impose a bad-conduct discharge. Only a general court-martial can impose a dishonorable discharge. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation.

General and Special Courts-Martial

General courts-martial tried 11 of the 27 cases (41%), about the same as the 42% across the Navy and Marine Corps. At general courts-martial, 7 of 9 convictions included confinement, with a median of 7 months. The 16 special courts-martial, which are capped at one year of confinement, included confinement in 62% of convictions, with a median of 3 months.

Junior enlisted members (E-1 to E-4) were 67% of the accused and NCOs were 33%. That is about the same as the 65% junior enlisted in the rest of the Navy and Marine Corps.

2021 Compared With 2022

The number of cases went from 37 to 27. The contested share went from 38% to 59%. Full acquittals went from 5 of 14 to 2 of 16. Median confinement went from 6 months to 5 months. The share of convictions with confinement went from 75% to 68%. The enlisted punitive discharge rate went from 41% to 44%. The general court-martial share was 41% in both years.

In groups this small, a few cases can cause these changes. They show direction, not precise size.

20212022
Cases3727
Contested (of pleas recorded)38%59%
Full acquittals (decided contested)5 of 142 of 16
Convictions with confinement75%68%
Median confinement6 months5 months
Punitive discharge (enlisted)41%44%
General courts-martial41%41%

Similar Installations and What the Records Cannot Show

Jacksonville, Florida tried 23 cases, and 35% were contested. Of 8 contested cases that reached a verdict there, 3 ended in a full acquittal, and its median confinement was 5 months. Camp Lejeune, North Carolina tried 48 cases, and 21% were contested. Its median confinement was 8 months and its enlisted punitive discharge rate was 77%.

The records list charges, pleas, findings, and sentences. They do not show the evidence, the plea terms, or conduct resolved outside a court-martial.

InstallationCasesContestedFull acquittals (decided contested)Median confinementPunitive discharge (enlisted)
San Diego, California2759%2 of 165 months44%
Jacksonville, Florida2335%3 of 85 months45%
Camp Lejeune, North Carolina4821%0 of 98 months77%

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.

How We Counted

Every court-martial tried at San Diego, California with a trial date in 2022 (27 cases).

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

Military Judges Who Presided Over Cases at San Diego, California, 2022

Names and links only. Each judge's record of pleas, findings, and sentences is on their Know Your Judge page, part of the Court-Martial Characters membership.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top