NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

Parris Island, South Carolina Before and After 2019: How Its Courts-Martial Changed

Parris Island, South Carolina tried 44 courts-martial in 2019–2023, against 20 in 2017–2018. The median confinement in 2019–2023 was 11 months, compared with 6 months across the Navy and Marine Corps.

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 7 min read

Trends › By Installation › Parris Island, South Carolina › Before and after 2019

Short answer: Parris Island, South Carolina tried 44 courts-martial in 2019–2023, against 20 in 2017–2018. The median confinement in 2019–2023 was 11 months, compared with 6 months across the Navy and Marine Corps. 82% of convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge, compared with 63% in the earlier period.

Based on 44 cases · 2019–2023 · Navy and Marine Corps records · data updated October 24, 2026

Longer Sentences Than the Service Median

83% of the 41 convictions at Parris Island from 2019 through 2023 included confinement. The median confinement was 11 months, compared with 6 months across the Navy and Marine Corps. A quarter of the sentences were 1.6 years or longer.

The largest difference is in sentences of 6 months to 1 year. They were 37% of convictions here, compared with 24% elsewhere in the Navy and Marine Corps. Sentences under 6 months were 20%, compared with 35%. 11 of 41 convictions (27%) carried more than one year, about the same as the 24% service-wide. These are adjudged sentences, announced at trial before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal. Each one covers every charge in a case.

Adjudged confinementConvictionsShare hereShare, the rest of the Navy and Marine Corps
No confinement717%17%
Under 6 months820%35%
6 months to 1 year1537%24%
More than 1 year, under 5 years922%19%
5 years or more25%5%

How the Recent Years Compare With 2017–2018

The records show 20 Parris Island cases from 2017–2018, about 10 a year. They show 44 from 2019–2023, about 9 a year, counting full years. The number changed from year to year: 7 in 2019, 14 in 2020, 6 in 2021, 4 in 2022, and 13 in 2023.

Median confinement went from 2 years in the earlier period to 11 months. The share of convicted enlisted members receiving a punitive discharge went from 63% to 82%. Convictions with confinement went from 80% to 83%. General courts-martial went from 50% to 45% of cases. With groups this small, a few cases can change a figure, so these changes show direction, not precise size.

2017–20182019–2023
Cases2044
Contested (of pleas recorded)0 of 130%
Convictions with confinement80%83%
Median confinement2 years11 months
Punitive discharge (enlisted)63%82%
General courts-martial50%45%

Most Convictions Included a Punitive Discharge

Of 40 convicted enlisted members, 33 received a bad-conduct or dishonorable discharge (82%), compared with 63% in the rest of the Navy and Marine Corps. 7 of the 33 were dishonorable discharges. A dishonorable discharge is the more severe punitive discharge, and only a general court-martial can impose it.

No officers or warrant officers appear among the accused. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation. Those separations are not in these records.

Orders, Larceny, and False Statements

Charge lists exist for 41 of the 44 cases. Article 92 (orders violation) was the most common charge, in 34% of cases, compared with 18% service-wide. Article 121 (larceny) appeared in 20%, compared with 9%. Article 107 (false official statements) appeared in 17%, compared with 8%. Article 131b (obstructing justice) appeared in 12%, compared with 6%.

Article 128 (assault) was less common: 22% of cases here, compared with 31% across the Navy and Marine Corps. Article 112a (drug offenses) appeared in 29% and Article 134, the general article, in 24%. A case with several articles counts under each one.

UCMJ ArticleCasesShare hereShare, all Navy and Marine Corps cases in those years
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation1434%18%
Art. 112a Wrongful use, possession of controlled substances1229%25%
Art. 134 General article1024%18%
Art. 128 Assault922%31%
Art. 121 Larceny820%9%
Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault717%14%
Art. 107 False official statements717%8%
Art. 131b Obstructing justice512%6%

Convictions on the Most Common Charges

Every case charging one of the leading articles ended in a conviction on that article: 14 of 14 for Article 92, 12 of 12 for Article 112a, 10 of 10 for Article 134, and 9 of 9 for Article 128.

The median confinement after those convictions was 10 months for Article 128, 11 months for Article 92, 1 year for Article 134, and 1.3 years for Article 112a. A case often includes several charges, so the sentence on one row covers the whole case, not only that article.

ArticleCases charging itConvicted of it (share)Median confinement when convicted of it
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation1414 (100%)11 months
Art. 112a Wrongful use, possession of controlled substances1212 (100%)1.3 years
Art. 134 General article1010 (100%)1 year
Art. 128 Assault99 (9 of 9)10 months

Pleas Where They Were Recorded

Only 20 of the 44 records list a plea, because Navy and Marine Corps records before December 2020 often omit it. Of those 20, 14 accused pleaded guilty and 6 contested at least one charge. A contested case is one with a not-guilty or mixed plea.

That is 30% contested, about the same as the 31% for the Navy and Marine Corps as a whole. 0 of the 6 contested cases that reached a verdict ended in a full acquittal.

Court Level and the Rank of the Accused

General courts-martial tried 20 cases (45%), about the same as the 44% service-wide. A general court-martial can impose any lawful sentence. Special courts-martial tried 24 cases. A special court-martial caps confinement at one year and cannot impose a dishonorable discharge. In general courts-martial, 95% of convictions included confinement, with a median of 1.6 years. In special courts-martial, 73% did, with a median of 7 months.

The accused were 26 junior enlisted members (E-1 to E-4) and 14 NCOs (E-5 to E-9). That mix is similar to the Navy and Marine Corps overall, where 64% were junior enlisted.

Compared With Miramar and Pensacola

MCAS Miramar, California (42 cases) and Pensacola, Florida (42) tried a similar number of cases in the same years. Parris Island had the longest median confinement of the 3: 11 months, compared with 6 months at Miramar and 3 months at Pensacola. It also had the highest punitive discharge rate: 82%, compared with 66% and 56%. Pensacola had the highest contested share, 59%, and 14 of its 24 contested cases that reached a verdict ended in a full acquittal.

InstallationCasesContestedFull acquittals (decided contested)Median confinementPunitive discharge (enlisted)
Parris Island, South Carolina4430%0 of 611 months82%
MCAS Miramar, California4230%0 of 66 months66%
Pensacola, Florida4259%14 of 243 months56%

What the Records Cannot Show

Trial records list charges, pleas, findings, and sentences. They do not show the evidence or any plea terms. They do not include conduct handled outside a court-martial, such as nonjudicial punishment. They give trial dates, not offense dates.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.

How We Counted

Every court-martial tried at Parris Island, South Carolina in 2017–2018 (20) and 2019–2023 (44).

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

Military Judges Who Presided Over Cases at Parris Island, South Carolina, 2019–2023

Names and links only. Each judge's record of pleas, findings, and sentences is on their Know Your Judge page, part of the Court-Martial Characters membership.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top