NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

What the Navy-Marine Corps Tried in September 2020

The records show 37 Navy and Marine Corps courts-martial in September 2020, and 35 ended in a conviction on at least one charge. Conspiracy under Article 81 appeared in 14% of cases, compared with 7% for all of 2020. The contested share was 37%, compared with 30% for the year.

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › By Year › September 2020

Short answer: The records show 37 Navy and Marine Corps courts-martial in September 2020, and 35 ended in a conviction on at least one charge. Conspiracy under Article 81 appeared in 14% of cases, compared with 7% for all of 2020. The contested share was 37%, compared with 30% for the year.

Based on 37 cases · September 2020 · Navy and Marine Corps records · data updated October 24, 2026

Almost Every Case Ended in a Conviction

Of the 37 cases, 35 ended in a conviction on at least one charge. Of the 7 contested cases that reached a verdict, only 1 ended in a full acquittal. In September 2019, 4 of 5 did.

All 12 cases charging Article 112a (wrongful use, possession of controlled substances) ended in a conviction on that article, with a median confinement of 10 months. Article 128 (assault) cases ended in a conviction on that article in 13 of 14 cases (93%), with a median of 1 year. One case can include a conviction on one article and an acquittal on another, so these rows overlap.

ArticleCases charging itConvicted of it (share)Median confinement when convicted of it
Art. 128 Assault1413 (93%)1 year
Art. 112a Wrongful use, possession of controlled substances1212 (100%)10 months

Conspiracy and Property Charges Were More Common

Charges are listed for 36 of the 37 cases, and a case with several articles is counted under each one. Article 81 (conspiracy) appeared in 5 cases (14%), compared with 7% for the year. Article 109 (property other than military; waste, spoilage, destruction) appeared in 4 cases (11%), compared with 2%.

Article 128 was the most common charge, in 14 cases (39%), about the same as the 36% for the year. Article 112a appeared in 12 cases (33%), compared with 30%. Article 120 (rape and sexual assault) appeared in 6 cases (17%), compared with 16%. Article 92 (failure to obey order or regulation) was less common: 4 cases (11%), compared with 18%.

UCMJ ArticleCasesShare hereShare, the Navy and Marine Corps for all of 2020
Art. 128 Assault1439%36%
Art. 112a Wrongful use, possession of controlled substances1233%30%
Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault617%16%
Art. 81 Conspiracy514%7%
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation411%18%
Art. 107 False official statements411%12%
Art. 109 Property other than military; waste, spoilage, destruction411%2%
Art. 121 Larceny38%8%

Pleas in the Records

A plea appears in 19 of the 37 records. Of those, 12 accused pleaded guilty and 7 contested at least one charge with a not-guilty or mixed plea. The contested share of 37% compares with 30% across the Navy and Marine Corps in 2020.

Navy and Marine Corps records before December 2020 often omit the plea. These counts are based only on the 19 records that include it.

Most Sentences Were Under 1 Year

Of the 35 convictions, 83% included confinement. The median confinement was 7 months, compared with a median of 6 months for the year. A quarter of the sentences with confinement were 1.2 years or longer.

Sentences longer than one year came in 8 of 35 convictions (23%), about the same as the 26% for 2020. All 8 were more than 1 year and under 5 years. No sentence was 5 years or more, compared with 6% of convictions for the year. These are adjudged sentences, set at trial before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal.

Adjudged confinementConvictionsShare hereShare, the Navy and Marine Corps for all of 2020
No confinement617%15%
Under 6 months1234%36%
6 months to 1 year926%23%
More than 1 year, under 5 years823%20%
5 years or more00%6%

General Versus Special Courts-Martial

General courts-martial made up 12 of the 37 cases (32%) and had a median confinement of 1.5 years. The 25 special courts-martial had a median of 3 months.

Only a general court-martial can impose more than one year of confinement or a dishonorable discharge. A special court-martial is limited to one year. Since 2019, a special court-martial tried by a military judge alone is limited to six months with no punitive discharge.

How Many Received a Punitive Discharge?

A bad-conduct or dishonorable discharge was part of 56% of enlisted convictions, lower than the 62% for the year. There were 13 bad-conduct discharges and 5 dishonorable discharges.

The records show 3 convicted officers or warrant officers, and 1 was dismissed. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out an administrative separation later.

Changes Since September 2019

The number of cases went from 30 to 37. The median confinement went from 6 months to 7 months. The contested share was about the same, 36% and 37%.

Punitive discharges for enlisted members went from 58% to 56%, and the general court-martial share went from 37% to 32%. Groups this small can change with only a few cases, so the comparison shows direction, not precise change.

September 2019September 2020
Cases3037
Contested (of pleas recorded)36%37%
Full acquittals (decided contested)4 of 51 of 7
Convictions with confinement81%83%
Median confinement6 months7 months
Punitive discharge (enlisted)58%56%
General courts-martial37%32%

Rank and Installations

Among the accused with rank recorded, 22 were junior enlisted (E-1 to E-4), 11 were NCOs (E-5 to E-9), and 3 were officers or warrant officers. That mix was similar to the year as a whole, when 64% of the accused were junior enlisted.

San Diego, California, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, and Norfolk, Virginia, tried 4 cases each. MCAS Miramar, California, and Okinawa, Japan, tried 3 each. These 5 locations account for 49% of the month. Larger installations try more cases of every kind, so a high count alone does not show a problem at a base.

Beyond the Court-Martial Records

Cases closed through nonjudicial punishment, administrative separation, or no action are not part of these records. The records also do not include the evidence or the terms of any plea agreement, so they do not explain the outcome of any case.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.

How We Counted

Navy and Marine Corps courts-martial with a trial date in September 2020 (37 cases), compared with the whole year.

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top