What Sentence Follows a Navy-Marine Corps Orders Violation Conviction?

Trends › By Offense › Article 92 › What Sentence Follows a Navy-Marine Corp

Based on 588 cases · 2017–2025 · Navy and Marine Corps records · data updated October 24, 2026

A Common Charge With Lighter Sentences

There were 588 orders-violation convictions in these years. Their sentences were slightly lighter than across the service. Of 588 convictions, 160 (27%) included no confinement, compared with 18% across all Navy and Marine Corps convictions.

Among sentences with confinement, the median was 5 months, and a quarter were 1 year or longer. Under 6 months: 228 convictions (39%), compared with 35% across the service. More than 1 year: 90 of 588 convictions (15%), compared with 25%. 5 years or more: 26 (4%), compared with 7%.

These are adjudged sentences, set at trial before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal. Each covers every charge in the case.

Usually Charged With Other Offenses

Article 92 was the only article charged in 93 of the 588 cases. Most cases included other charges: Article 128 (assault) in 140 cases, Article 112a (drug) in 134, Article 134 (general article) in 85, Article 107 (false official statement) in 77, and Article 131b (obstruction, numbered since 2019) in 64.

The sentences here therefore cover many different kinds of conduct. A sentence covers every finding, so the records cannot isolate the part tied to the orders violation.

Court Level and Sentence Length

General courts-martial, the level that can impose long confinement and a dishonorable discharge, were 30% of these cases (178 of 588). Special courts-martial tried the other 410. A special court-martial can impose no more than 1 year of confinement and cannot impose a dishonorable discharge.

At general courts-martial, 83% of convictions included confinement, and the median was 1.3 years. At special courts-martial, 69% did, and the median was 3 months.

More Cases Were Contested

Pleas are recorded in 374 of the 588 records: 254 guilty pleas and 120 contested cases, in which the accused pleaded not guilty to at least one charge. The contested share was 32%, higher than the 24% across all Navy and Marine Corps convictions.

Every case here ended in a conviction on at least one charge, so there are no full acquittals in this group. In 46 of the 120 contested cases, the result was a partial acquittal: the accused was acquitted of at least one charge or specification and convicted of another.

Fewer Punitive Discharges Than the Service

A punitive discharge followed 55% of enlisted convictions: 239 bad-conduct discharges and 61 dishonorable discharges. Across all Navy and Marine Corps convictions, the share was 62%.

Officers and warrant officers had 16 convictions, and 2 of them were dismissed. Dismissal is the officer form of a punitive discharge. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation.

A Relatively Senior Group

Among the accused with rank recorded, 340 were junior enlisted members, 210 were NCOs, and 16 were officers. The group is more senior than all Navy and Marine Corps convictions in these years. NCOs were a large part of the group. Officers were 16 of the 588 convictions.

Cases Each Year and Installations

The yearly counts were between 53 and 85. The highest count was 85, in 2021. There were 76 in 2025. The records do not explain the changes from year to year.

Camp Lejeune, North Carolina tried 117 of the cases, Camp Pendleton, California 98, San Diego, California 48, Norfolk, Virginia 38, and Marine Corps Base Hawaii, Kaneohe Bay 37. These 5 locations account for 57% of the 588. Larger installations try more cases of every kind.

How the Law Changed

On January 1, 2019, the Military Justice Act of 2016 introduced fixed panel sizes, judge-alone special courts-martial limited to 6 months of confinement with no punitive discharge, and written plea agreements. Cases with older offenses kept the old rules. Since December 28, 2023, special trial counsel decide whether to prosecute covered offenses. Judges set sentences under new parameters when every guilty finding is for an offense after December 27, 2023. The records have no offense dates, so newer trials include cases under both sets of rules.

Beyond These Records

Trial records list the charges, pleas, findings, and sentence. They do not list the order involved, the evidence, or the plea terms. Orders violations handled outside a court-martial are not counted. Records before December 2020 often lack the plea, so plea counts use only the records that list it.

For what the offense covers and how it is defended, see Article 92 on the law firm's website. Dates and sources for the law changes: UCMJ change timeline.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.