NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

Malmstrom AFB, Montana Courts-Martial, 2019–2023: What 13 Cases Show

Malmstrom AFB, Montana held 13 courts-martial from 2019–2023. The median confinement was 8 months, longer than the 4 months across the Air Force, and only 1 of the 13 cases ended in a full acquittal (8%).

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › By Installation › Malmstrom AFB, Montana › 2019–2023

Short answer: Malmstrom AFB, Montana held 13 courts-martial from 2019–2023. The median confinement was 8 months, longer than the 4 months across the Air Force, and only 1 of the 13 cases ended in a full acquittal (8%). A punitive discharge followed 50% of enlisted convictions, compared with 56% Air Force-wide.

Based on 13 cases · 2019–2023 · Air Force records · data updated October 24, 2026

Longer Confinement Than the Air Force Median

Of the 13 cases, 12 ended in a conviction on at least one charge. Confinement was part of 9 of those sentences (75%). The median confinement was 8 months, compared with 4 months in all Air Force cases in those years.

A quarter of the sentences with confinement were 1.5 years or longer. These are adjudged sentences, set at trial before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal, and each one covers every charge in the case.

Most Cases Were General Courts-Martial

General courts-martial made up 69% of the cases (9 of 13), and special courts-martial made up the rest. A general court-martial can impose any lawful sentence, including long confinement and a dishonorable discharge. A special court-martial caps confinement at 1 year.

One Full Acquittal

Only 1 of the 13 cases ended in a full acquittal (8%). In the rest of the Air Force the rate was 24%. Because Air Force records from 2016 to 2019 rarely list guilty pleas, this rate uses all cases as the base.

Pleas are recorded for 9 of the 13 cases, and 6 of those 9 were contested. A contested case is one where the accused pleaded not guilty to at least one charge. Of the 6 contested cases that reached a verdict, 1 ended in a full acquittal.

Drug Offenses and the General Article

Charge lists cover 12 of the 13 cases, and a case is counted under each article it lists. Article 112a (drug use or possession) and Article 134 (the general article) were each charged in 4 cases, or 33%. The drug share was lower than the 41% Air Force-wide. The Article 134 share was higher than the 21% Air Force-wide.

Article 107 (false official statements) was charged in 2 cases (17%), compared with 6% in the Air Force. Article 120 (rape and sexual assault) and Article 128 (assault) were each charged in 2 cases as well.

UCMJ ArticleCasesShare hereShare, Air Force-wide
Art. 112a Wrongful use, possession of controlled substances433%41%
Art. 134 General article433%21%
Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault217%11%
Art. 107 False official statements217%6%
Art. 128 Assault217%19%
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation18%16%
Art. 114 Dueling before 2019, endangerment since18%1%
Art. 115 Malingering before 2019, communicating threats since18%4%

Discharges and Dismissals

A punitive discharge followed 50% of the enlisted convictions: 2 bad-conduct discharges and 3 dishonorable discharges. The Air Force rate was 56%. Of the 2 convicted officers or warrant officers, 1 was dismissed, which is the officer equivalent of a punitive discharge.

Most Cases Were Tried Without a Panel

A military judge alone decided guilt in 10 of the 13 cases (77%). Members heard 3: 1 enlisted panel and 2 officer panels. The accused usually makes this choice.

Junior enlisted members (E-1 to E-4) were 62% of the accused, NCOs 23%, and officers 15%. Across the Air Force, junior enlisted members were 64%.

Changes From 2016–2018

In 2016–2018 Malmstrom had 12 cases, about 4 a year, compared with about 3 a year in 2019–2023. The median confinement went from 4 months to 8 months. The punitive discharge rate went from 40% to 50%, and the general court-martial share went from 50% to 69%. With groups this small, a few cases can move each figure.

2016–20182019–2023
Cases1213
Contested (of pleas recorded)—6 of 9
Convictions with confinement80%75%
Median confinement4 months8 months
Punitive discharge (enlisted)40%50%
General courts-martial50%69%

Other Installations, and What Is Missing

RAF Mildenhall, United Kingdom and USAF Academy, Colorado each tried 20 Air Force cases in the same years. Mildenhall had the same median confinement, 8 months, and a punitive discharge rate of 73%. The Academy had a median of 4 months and a rate of 7%.

The cases ran from March 2019 to May 2023, with none in 2020. They are 1% of the 1,361 Air Force courts-martial in those years. The records do not include nonjudicial punishment or administrative separations, and they do not describe the evidence or plea terms.

InstallationCasesContestedFull acquittals (decided contested)Median confinementPunitive discharge (enlisted)
Malmstrom AFB, Montana136 of 91 of 68 months50%
RAF Mildenhall, United Kingdom2050%1 of 78 months73%
USAF Academy, Colorado2075%3 of 94 months7%

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.

How We Counted

Every court-martial in the data tried at Malmstrom AFB, Montana with a trial date in 2019–2023 (13 cases), compared with all 1,361 Air Force trials in those years. Dates are trial dates.

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

Military Judges Who Presided Over Cases at Malmstrom AFB, Montana, 2019–2023

Names and links only. Each judge's record of pleas, findings, and sentences is on their Know Your Judge page, part of the Court-Martial Characters membership.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top