> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.bodiesburied.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, 2016–2018 vs. 2019–2023: A Side-by-Side Look
- URL: https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/jb-pearl-harbor-hickam-hawaii-before-after-2019/
- Published: 2026-10-28T06:34:09.000Z
- Updated: 2026-10-30T08:06:13.000Z
- Description: JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii had 34 Air Force courts-martial in 2019–2023, compared with 24 in 2016–2018. Drug charges under Article 112a were in 62% of the later cases that list charges, compared with 41% across the Air Force.
- Author: Jocelyn C. Stewart
- Tags: Understanding Trends, JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, Air Force

[Trends](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/) › [By Installation](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/by-installation/) › [JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/courts-martial-at-jb-pearl-harbor-hickam-hawaii/) › Before and after 2019

**Short answer:** JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii had 34 Air Force courts-martial in 2019–2023, compared with 24 in 2016–2018\. Drug charges under Article 112a were in 62% of the later cases that list charges, compared with 41% across the Air Force. Punitive discharges for convicted enlisted members went from 45% in the earlier period to 64%.

Based on 34 cases · 2019–2023 · Air Force records · data updated October 24, 2026

## Drug Charges Were More Common Than Across the Air Force

Of the 26 Air Force cases at JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam in 2019–2023 whose records list charges, 16 charged Article 112a, the article covering wrongful use and possession of controlled substances. That is 62%, compared with 41% in the rest of the Air Force.

Several other articles were also charged more often than across the Air Force. Article 134 (the general article) was charged in 27% of cases, compared with 21%. Article 92 (failure to obey an order or regulation) was charged in 23%, compared with 16%. Article 128 (assault) was charged in 23%, compared with 19%. Article 113 (drunken or reckless driving since 2019, misbehavior of a sentinel before that) and Article 128b (domestic violence) were each charged in 12%, compared with 4% and 5%. A single case can fall under several articles.

| UCMJ Article                                                                                                                                                                      | Cases | Share here | Share, the rest of the Air Force |
| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | ---------- | -------------------------------- |
| [Art. 112a](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/ucmj/article-112a-drug-offenses/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Wrongful use, possession of controlled substances                                | 16    | 62%        | 41%                              |
| [Art. 134](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-134/?ref=bodiesburied.com) General article                                                          | 7     | 27%        | 21%                              |
| [Art. 92](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-92/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Failure to obey order or regulation                                        | 6     | 23%        | 16%                              |
| [Art. 128](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-128/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Assault                                                                  | 6     | 23%        | 19%                              |
| [Art. 113](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-113/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Misbehavior of a sentinel before 2019, drunken or reckless driving since | 3     | 12%        | 4%                               |
| [Art. 128b](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/ucmj/article-128b-domestic-violence/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Domestic violence                                                            | 3     | 12%        | 5%                               |
| [Art. 86](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-86/?ref=bodiesburied.com) AWOL                                                                       | 2     | 8%         | 5%                               |
| [Art. 107](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-107/?ref=bodiesburied.com) False official statements                                                | 2     | 8%         | 6%                               |

## How the Two Periods Compare

This page sets 2016–2018 beside 2019–2023\. The earlier period had 24 cases, about 8 a year. The later period had about 7 a year, counting full years only. The median adjudged confinement went from 3 months to 4 months, and the share of convictions with any confinement went from 77% to 85%.

Punitive discharges for convicted enlisted members went from 45% to 64%. General courts-martial went from 38% of cases to 47%. In small groups a few cases can change a percentage, so these changes show direction, not precision.

|                               | 2016–2018 | 2019–2023 |
| ----------------------------- | --------- | --------- |
| Cases                         | 24        | 34        |
| Contested (of pleas recorded) | —         | 39%       |
| Convictions with confinement  | 77%       | 85%       |
| Median confinement            | 3 months  | 4 months  |
| Punitive discharge (enlisted) | 45%       | 64%       |
| General courts-martial        | 38%       | 47%       |

## The Later Cases Year by Year

From March 2019 to December 2023, the data holds 34 cases: 4 in 2019, 11 in 2020, 8 in 2021, 4 in 2022, and 7 in 2023.

## Fewer Contested Cases and Fewer Full Acquittals

Of the 28 records that list a plea, 17 were guilty pleas and 11 were contested, meaning the accused pleaded not guilty to at least one charge. That is 39% contested, compared with 50% across the Air Force.

Of the 11 decided contested cases, 45% ended in a full acquittal, lower than the 51% across the Air Force. Another 2 were partial acquittals, not guilty of at least one charge but guilty of another. Air Force results give one verdict per case, so a partial acquittal appears only when an appeals opinion reports it.

Members heard 7 of the 11 contested cases (64%). Across all cases with the forum listed, members heard 29%: 4 enlisted panels and 6 officer panels. A military judge alone decided the other 24.

## Sentences After Conviction

26 cases ended in a conviction on at least one charge, and 22 of those sentences included confinement (85%). The median confinement was 4 months, the same as in all Air Force cases in those years. A quarter of the sentences were 10 months or longer.

Sentences longer than one year were less common here: 4 of 26 convictions (15%), compared with 23% across the Air Force. These are adjudged sentences, before clemency or appeal, and they cover every charge in the case.

| Adjudged confinement            | Convictions | Share here | Share, the Air Force as a whole |
| ------------------------------- | ----------- | ---------- | ------------------------------- |
| No confinement                  | 4           | 15%        | 12%                             |
| Under 6 months                  | 14          | 54%        | 50%                             |
| 6 months to 1 year              | 4           | 15%        | 15%                             |
| More than 1 year, under 5 years | 3           | 12%        | 17%                             |
| 5 years or more                 | 1           | 4%         | 6%                              |

## General Versus Special Courts-Martial

At the 16 general courts-martial, 7 of 9 convictions included confinement, and the median was 1.2 years. At the 18 special courts-martial, 88% of convictions included confinement, and the median was 3 months. A special court-martial caps confinement at one year and cannot impose a dishonorable discharge.

General courts-martial were 47% of cases here, lower than the 53% in the rest of the Air Force.

## Discharges and Who Was Charged

16 of 25 convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge: 13 bad-conduct and 3 dishonorable. In the rest of the Air Force the share was 56%. 1 officer or warrant officer was convicted, and none was dismissed. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation.

By rank, the accused were 21 junior enlisted members, 12 NCOs, and 1 officer. This mix was similar to the Air Force as a whole.

## Compared With Similar Installations

Dyess AFB, Texas (36 cases) and Ramstein AB, Germany (38 cases) tried a similar number of Air Force cases in these years. Pearl Harbor-Hickam had the lowest contested share of the 3: 39%, compared with 43% at Dyess and 61% at Ramstein. Its punitive discharge share, 64%, was higher than at Dyess (42%) or Ramstein (43%). Its median confinement, 4 months, was between Dyess at 3 months and Ramstein at 5 months.

| Installation                   | Cases | Contested | Full acquittals (decided contested) | Median confinement | Punitive discharge (enlisted) |
| ------------------------------ | ----- | --------- | ----------------------------------- | ------------------ | ----------------------------- |
| JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii | 34    | 39%       | 5 of 11                             | 4 months           | 64%                           |
| Dyess AFB, Texas               | 36    | 43%       | 6 of 10                             | 3 months           | 42%                           |
| Ramstein AB, Germany           | 38    | 61%       | 9 of 19                             | 5 months           | 43%                           |

## Limits of These Figures

Only cases that reached a courtroom are counted. Air Force records never report plea agreements, rarely list charges in full acquittals, and from 2016 to 2019 rarely list a guilty plea, so the earlier period has no contested share. Nonjudicial punishment and administrative separations are not in the data.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: [UCMJ change timeline](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/ucmj-change-timeline/).

### How We Counted

Every court-martial tried at JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii in 2016–2018 (24) and 2019–2023 (34).

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in [Military Trial Results](https://www.bodiesburied.com/military-trial-results/), data updated October 24, 2026\. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: [how this data was built](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/how-the-military-trial-results-data-was-built/). Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

## Related Analysis

- [JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii: Court-Martial Data and Trends](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/courts-martial-at-jb-pearl-harbor-hickam-hawaii/) (hub)
- [By Installation](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/by-installation/) (hub)
- [JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, 2019–2023: Charges, Verdicts, and Sentences in 34 Cases](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/jb-pearl-harbor-hickam-hawaii-courts-martial-2019-2023/)
- [JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii Courts-Martial, 2016–2018: What 24 Cases Show](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/jb-pearl-harbor-hickam-hawaii-courts-martial-2016-2018/)
- [JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, 2024–2026: Charges, Verdicts, and Sentences in 15 Cases](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/jb-pearl-harbor-hickam-hawaii-courts-martial-2024-2026/)
- [Did Drug Cases at JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii Change After 2020?](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/jb-pearl-harbor-hickam-hawaii-article-112a-before-after-2020/)
- [Andersen AFB, Guam Before and After 2019: How Its Courts-Martial Changed](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/andersen-afb-guam-before-after-2019/)
- [Aviano AB, Italy, 2016–2018 vs. 2019–2023: A Side-by-Side Look](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/aviano-ab-italy-before-after-2019/)
- [Aviano AB, Italy, 2019–2023 vs. 2024–2026: A Side-by-Side Look](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/aviano-ab-italy-before-after-2024/)
- [Search every case in Military Trial Results](https://www.bodiesburied.com/military-trial-results/) (members)

## Military Judges Who Presided Over Cases at JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, 2019–2023

- [James R. Dorman](https://www.bodiesburied.com/judge-james-r-dorman/)
- [Joseph S. Imburgia](https://www.bodiesburied.com/judge-joseph-s-imburgia/)
- [Christopher D. James](https://www.bodiesburied.com/judge-christopher-d-james/)
- [Jennifer E. Powell](https://www.bodiesburied.com/judge-jennifer-e-powell/)
- [Matthew P. Stoffel](https://www.bodiesburied.com/judge-matthew-p-stoffel/)

Names and links only. Each judge's record of pleas, findings, and sentences is on their Know Your Judge page, part of the [Court-Martial Characters](https://www.bodiesburied.com/judges/) membership.

**About the author.** Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts *Where All The Bodies Are Buried* and runs the [Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/?ref=bodiesburied.com). This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.