NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

Fort Irwin Courts-Martial, 2024–2026: What 19 Cases Show

From 2024 to 2026, the records hold 19 courts-martial at Fort Irwin. Article 128b (domestic violence) was charged in 58% of them, compared with 25% across the Army. The median confinement was 8 months, compared with 6 months in the rest of the Army.

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 5 min read

Trends › By Installation › Fort Irwin › 2024–2026

Short answer: From 2024 to 2026, the records hold 19 courts-martial at Fort Irwin. Article 128b (domestic violence) was charged in 58% of them, compared with 25% across the Army. The median confinement was 8 months, compared with 6 months in the rest of the Army.

Based on 19 cases · 2024–2026 · Army records · data updated October 24, 2026

Domestic Violence Charges

All 19 records list charges. Article 128b (domestic violence) appears in 11 cases (58%), compared with 25% across the Army in those years. Article 128 (assault) appears in 4 (21%), about the same as the 20% Army share.

Article 90 (willfully disobeying a superior officer) appears in 3 cases (16%), compared with 6%. Article 109 (waste, spoilage, or destruction of property other than military property) appears in 2 (11%), compared with 1%. Article 134, Article 121, Article 92, and Article 120 also appear. A case with several articles counts under each one.

UCMJ ArticleCasesShare hereShare, the Army as a whole
Art. 128b Domestic violence1158%25%
Art. 128 Assault421%20%
Art. 90 Willfully disobeying superior officer316%6%
Art. 134 General article316%21%
Art. 121 Larceny211%7%
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation211%10%
Art. 109 Property other than military; waste, spoilage, destruction211%1%
Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault211%11%

Sentences After Conviction

17 cases ended in a conviction on at least one charge, and 15 of those sentences included confinement (88%). The median was 8 months, longer than the 6 months Army-wide. A quarter of the terms were 1.5 years or longer.

Among 16 convicted enlisted members, 13 received a bad-conduct or dishonorable discharge (81%), compared with 73% across the Army. 4 were dishonorable. 1 convicted officer appears here and was not dismissed.

All of these are adjudged sentences, set at trial before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation.

Pleas and Plea Agreements

14 accused pleaded guilty and 5 contested at least one charge. The contested share was 26%, compared with 21% across the Army. Of the 5 contested cases that reached a verdict, 2 ended in a full acquittal.

13 of the 14 guilty pleas are recorded with a plea agreement, and 1 has no entry. The records say whether an agreement existed, not its terms.

Compared With 2020 to 2023

Fort Irwin also had 19 cases in 2020 to 2023, about 5 a year. Since 2024 the pace is about 6 a year, counting full years only. The contested share went from 42% to 26%, and punitive discharges for convicted enlisted members went from 64% to 81%.

The median confinement went from 9 months to 8 months. General courts-martial went from 58% of cases to 47%. In groups this small, a few cases can change each figure.

2020–20232024–2026
Cases1919
Contested (of pleas recorded)42%26%
Full acquittals (decided contested)2 of 72 of 5
Convictions with confinement88%88%
Median confinement9 months8 months
Punitive discharge (enlisted)64%81%
General courts-martial58%47%

Forum, Rank, and Court Level

A military judge alone decided guilt in 16 of the 18 cases with a forum listed (89%). An enlisted panel decided 1 and an officer panel decided 1.

By rank, the accused were 12 junior enlisted members, 6 NCOs, and 1 officer, a group more junior than the Army as a whole. 9 of the 19 cases were general courts-martial (47%), compared with 69% in the rest of the Army. A special court-martial caps confinement at one year and cannot impose a dishonorable discharge.

Similar Installations

Fort Leavenworth tried 20 cases and Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston tried 21 in the same years. Fort Leavenworth had a median confinement of 1.2 years and the same 81% punitive discharge rate as Fort Irwin. Fort Sam Houston had a median of 4 months and a rate of 41%.

InstallationCasesContestedFull acquittals (decided contested)Median confinementPunitive discharge (enlisted)
Fort Irwin1926%2 of 58 months81%
Fort Leavenworth2035%1 of 71.2 years81%
Joint Base San Antonio-Fort Sam Houston215%0 of 14 months41%

Dates, Rule Changes, and Record Limits

The trials ran from January 2024 to September 2026: 5 in 2024, 7 in 2025, and 7 so far in 2026. They are 2% of the 1,252 Army courts-martial in those years.

Since December 28, 2023, special trial counsel decide whether to prosecute covered offenses such as domestic violence and sexual assault. Judges set the sentence when every guilty finding is for an offense after December 27, 2023. Because the records give trial dates, not offense dates, they cannot show which rules applied to a case. They also do not show the evidence, plea terms, or nonjudicial punishment.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.

How We Counted

Every court-martial in the data tried at Fort Irwin with a trial date in 2024–2026 (19 cases), compared with all 1,252 Army trials in those years. Dates are trial dates.

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

Military Judges Who Presided Over Cases at Fort Irwin, 2024–2026

Names and links only. Each judge's record of pleas, findings, and sentences is on their Know Your Judge page, part of the Court-Martial Characters membership.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top