Federal Other Offense Sentences in the Western District of Pennsylvania, FY2016–2025
The Commission's offense type "Other" is a catch-all group of mixed offenses. In the Western District of Pennsylvania, 28 people were sentenced under it in fiscal years 2016 to 2024, and all 28 pleaded guilty. Of the 28, 16 (57%) received a prison term, with a median of 5.5 months.
· Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read
Trends › Federal Prosecution Analysis › Federal Sentences in the Western District of Pennsylvania, F › Other Offense: Western District of Pennsylvania
In brief: The Commission's offense type "Other" is a catch-all group of mixed offenses. In the Western District of Pennsylvania, 28 people were sentenced under it in fiscal years 2016 to 2024, and all 28 pleaded guilty. Of the 28, 16 (57%) received a prison term, with a median of 5.5 months.
This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 28 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. It is part of the Federal Prosecution Analysis series, which builds on Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System. How the numbers were built: How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built.
A Mixed Group of Offenses
"Other" is the U.S. Sentencing Commission's label for cases that do not fit its named offense types. The cases here are grouped by primary guideline, and the guidelines are varied.
§2A5.2 (Interference with Flight Crew Member or Flight Attendant) and §2D2.2 (Acquiring a Controlled Substance by Forgery, Fraud, Deception, or Subterfuge) were each the primary guideline for 3 people. §2D1.7 (Unlawful Sale or Transportation of Drug Paraphernalia) and §2X3.1 (Accessory After the Fact) were each the primary guideline for 1.
Because the cases are so varied, the figures below describe a mixed group and not one kind of offense. The records do not describe any case.
Prison Terms and Probation
Of the 28 people, 16 (57%) received a prison term, and 10 (36%) received probation only, with no prison or other confinement.
Among those sent to prison, the median prison term was 5.5 months. A quarter received 17.2 months or more, and a quarter received 0 months or less.
Across all 94 federal districts, 38% of people in the "Other" type were sent to prison, and the median prison term was 0.2 months. In this district, the share sent to prison was higher, and the median was higher. For all offenses in this district, the median prison term was 48 months.
Sentences Against the Guideline Range
Of the 28 people, 19 (68%) were sentenced within the guideline range. Another 6 (21%) were sentenced below the range at the government's request, and 2 (7%) were sentenced below it without a government request. One person (4%) was sentenced above the range.
Across all districts, 90% of sentences in this type were within the range, so the share here was lower. For all offenses in this district, it was 38%.
Pleas and Other Orders
All 28 people (100%) pleaded guilty, and 0 were convicted after a trial. Written plea agreements covered 79% of the guilty pleas, and 11% were straight pleas.
A mandatory minimum prison term applied to 0 of the 21 people with that information recorded. Supervised release after prison was ordered for 14 people (50%), with a median term of 36 months. A fine was ordered for 4 (14%), and restitution for 12 (43%).
In criminal history, 43% were in the lowest category and 7% were in the highest. Court-martial records have no criminal history field.
Counts by Year and Limits of the Records
These cases were less than 1% of the 4,460 people sentenced in the district in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. Fiscal years 2016 to 2019 account for 11 people, and fiscal years 2020 to 2025 account for 17.
The table shows 2 to 4 people in each fiscal year, so the yearly medians, which range from 0 months to 44 months, do not show a trend. Only people who were convicted and sentenced are in the data, and the prison terms are those imposed, not time served.
| Fiscal year | People sentenced | Median prison | Pleaded guilty |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 3 | 6 months | 3 of 3 |
| 2017 | 2 | 10.5 months | 2 of 2 |
| 2018 | 4 | n/a | 4 of 4 |
| 2019 | 2 | 0 months | 2 of 2 |
| 2020 | 3 | 0 months | 3 of 3 |
| 2021 | 4 | 7 months | 4 of 4 |
| 2022 | 4 | 4 months | 4 of 4 |
| 2023 | 3 | 29 months | 3 of 3 |
| 2024 | 3 | 44 months | 3 of 3 |
How We Counted
Everyone sentenced in federal court in the Western District of Pennsylvania (U.S. Sentencing Commission district label "Penn. West") in fiscal years 2016 to 2025 whose offense type was "Other" (28). Offense types are the Commission's OFFGUIDE categories.
Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records.
What to Keep in Mind
No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct. Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served.
Federal supervised release. Most federal prison sentences are followed by a term of supervised release that the judge sets as part of the sentence. A person who violates it can be sent back to prison. A court-martial cannot sentence anyone to supervision after release. Military parole and mandatory supervised release are decided later by a board, not by the judge at trial.
Who decides the sentence, and under what rules. Federal judges sentence every federal case. They must calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, which is advisory, and must impose any mandatory minimum the statute requires unless an exception applies. In courts-martial, the accused could choose sentencing by members until the rules changed. For cases in which every guilty finding is for an offense committed after December 27, 2023, a military judge sentences alone, within sentencing parameters. Courts-martial tried in 2024 and later include both old-rule and new-rule cases, and the data cannot tell them apart.
Time periods. Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually.
How life sentences and "time served" are counted. In the federal numbers, a life sentence is counted as 470 months, and any other sentence longer than 470 months is counted as just under 470 months. A sentence of "time served" is counted as one day (0.03 months). Averages are affected by these rules; medians much less.
Related Analysis
- Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System (the background article)
- Federal Prosecution Analysis (all federal posts)
- How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built (sources and method)
- Federal Sentences in the Western District of Pennsylvania, FY2016–2025 (overview)
- Federal Drug Trafficking Sentences in the Western District of Pennsylvania, FY2016–2025 (same district, other offense type)
- Federal Fraud, Theft, and Embezzlement Sentences in the Western District of Pennsylvania, FY2016–2025 (same district, other offense type)
- Federal Firearms Sentences in the Western District of Pennsylvania, FY2016–2025 (same district, other offense type)
- Federal Child Pornography Sentences in the Western District of Pennsylvania, FY2016–2025 (same district, other offense type)
- U.S. Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles (source)
- Federal Judicial Center, Integrated Database (criminal defendants) (source)
About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.