NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

Federal Obscenity and Other Sex Offense Sentences in the Middle District of Georgia, FY2016–2025

Of the 40 people sentenced in the Middle District of Georgia in fiscal years 2016 to 2025 in the "Obscenity/Other Sex Offenses" category, 36 had failure to register as a sex offender as the primary guideline. 37 of the 40 (93%) received a prison term, and the median was 18 months, the same as the na

· Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › Federal Prosecution Analysis › Federal Sentences in the Middle District of Georgia, FY2016– › Obscenity and Other Sex Offense: Middle District of Georgia

In brief: Of the 40 people sentenced in the Middle District of Georgia in fiscal years 2016 to 2025 in the "Obscenity/Other Sex Offenses" category, 36 had failure to register as a sex offender as the primary guideline. 37 of the 40 (93%) received a prison term, and the median was 18 months, the same as the national median for this category.

Updated November 4, 2026 · Sources: U.S. Sentencing Commission and Federal Judicial Center, fiscal years 2016–2025

This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 40 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. It is part of the Federal Prosecution Analysis series, which builds on Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System. How the numbers were built: How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built.

Mostly Failure-to-Register Cases

The Commission's "Obscenity/Other Sex Offenses" category is a grouping, and it does not mean obscenity cases only. In this district, §2A3.5 (Failure to Register as a Sex Offender) was the primary guideline for 36 of the 40 people. §2G3.1 (Importing, Mailing, or Transporting Obscene Matter) was the primary guideline for 4.

These cases were less than 1% of the 4,094 people sentenced in the district over the period.

Prison Terms

37 of the 40 people (93%) received a prison term, and 2 (5%) received probation only.

The median prison term was 18 months. A quarter received 27 months or more, and a quarter received 12 months or less. The sheet reports the terms imposed, which are not the same as time served.

A mandatory minimum prison term applied to 0 of the 40 people with that information recorded.

Compared With All 94 Districts

Nationally, 3,595 people were sentenced in this category. 95% were sent to prison, and the median prison term was 18 months. Guilty pleas were 99%. Sentences were within the guideline range for 54%.

In this district, the share sent to prison was a little lower than the national share, and the median prison term was the same. For all offenses in the district, the median prison term was 51 months, which is higher than the 18 months in this category.

All 40 People Pleaded Guilty

40 of 40 (100%) pleaded guilty, and none were convicted after a trial. For that reason the records give no trial comparison.

Among guilty pleas, 33% had a written plea agreement and 68% were straight pleas with no agreement.

Where Sentences Fell Against the Guideline Range

63% of the sentences (25) were within the guideline range. 8% (3) were below the range at the government's request, and 25% (10) were below the range without a government request. 5% (2) were above the range.

The within-range share was higher in this district than nationally, where it was 54%. For all offenses in the district, it was 66%.

Supervised Release, Fines, and Criminal History

37 people (93%) were ordered to serve supervised release after prison, and the median term was 60 months. A fine was ordered for 1 person (3%). No restitution was ordered.

Criminal history differed from most categories. 15% of the people were in category I, the lowest, and 20% were in category VI, the highest. Court-martial records have no criminal history field.

Few Cases in Each Year

The district sentenced 10 people in fiscal years 2016 to 2019 and 30 people in fiscal years 2020 to 2025. Each fiscal year starts on October 1.

Yearly counts were between 1 and 7. With groups this small, the medians in the table, which range from 13 months to 27.5 months, show the spread and not a trend.

Fiscal yearPeople sentencedMedian prisonPleaded guilty
2016216 months2 of 2
2017121 months1 of 1
2018427.5 months4 of 4
2019321 months3 of 3
2020721 months7 of 7
2021716.5 months7 of 7
2022213 months2 of 2
2023618 months6 of 6
2024421 months4 of 4
2025418 months4 of 4

What Cannot Be Learned Here

Only people who were convicted and sentenced appear in the Commission's data. People who were acquitted or whose cases were dismissed are missing, and no facts of any case are given.

Fort Benning, Moody AFB, and Robins AFB are in this district. Military courts, not this federal district court, try courts-martial.

How We Counted

Everyone sentenced in federal court in the Middle District of Georgia (U.S. Sentencing Commission district label "Georgia Mid") in fiscal years 2016 to 2025 whose offense type was "Obscenity/Other Sex Offenses" (40). Offense types are the Commission's OFFGUIDE categories.

Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records.

What to Keep in Mind

No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct. Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served.

Federal supervised release. Most federal prison sentences are followed by a term of supervised release that the judge sets as part of the sentence. A person who violates it can be sent back to prison. A court-martial cannot sentence anyone to supervision after release. Military parole and mandatory supervised release are decided later by a board, not by the judge at trial.

Who decides the sentence, and under what rules. Federal judges sentence every federal case. They must calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, which is advisory, and must impose any mandatory minimum the statute requires unless an exception applies. In courts-martial, the accused could choose sentencing by members until the rules changed. For cases in which every guilty finding is for an offense committed after December 27, 2023, a military judge sentences alone, within sentencing parameters. Courts-martial tried in 2024 and later include both old-rule and new-rule cases, and the data cannot tell them apart.

Time periods. Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually.

How life sentences and "time served" are counted. In the federal numbers, a life sentence is counted as 470 months, and any other sentence longer than 470 months is counted as just under 470 months. A sentence of "time served" is counted as one day (0.03 months). Averages are affected by these rules; medians much less.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top