Federal Forgery, Counterfeiting, and Copyright Sentences in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, FY2016–2025
The Eastern District of Pennsylvania sentenced 38 people for forgery, counterfeiting, and copyright offenses in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. 33 (87%) received a prison term, and the median was 14 months, compared with 17.6 months in all 94 federal districts. No mandatory minimum applied to any of the
· Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read
Trends › Federal Prosecution Analysis › Federal Sentences in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, F › Forgery, Counterfeiting, and Copyright: Eastern District of Pennsylvania
In brief: The Eastern District of Pennsylvania sentenced 38 people for forgery, counterfeiting, and copyright offenses in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. 33 (87%) received a prison term, and the median was 14 months, compared with 17.6 months in all 94 federal districts. No mandatory minimum applied to any of the 38.
This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 38 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. It is part of the Federal Prosecution Analysis series, which builds on Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System. How the numbers were built: How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built.
Prison Terms Were Shorter Than in All Districts
Of the 38 people sentenced, 33 (87%) received a prison term and 4 (11%) received probation only. The median prison term was 14 months. A quarter received 4 months or less, and a quarter received 24 months or more.
For this offense type in all districts, 1,994 people were sentenced, 77% were sent to prison, and the median prison term was 17.6 months. The district's share sent to prison was higher, and its median was lower. For all offenses in this district, the median was 42 months.
What "Forgery/Counter/Copyright" Covers
"Forgery/Counter/Copyright" is the U.S. Sentencing Commission's name for this offense type. It is assigned from the primary guideline in each case.
20 cases used §2B5.1 (Offenses Involving Counterfeit Bearer Obligations of the United States). 18 used §2B5.3 (Criminal Infringement of Copyright or Trademark). These are the only guidelines listed as most common for this offense type in the district.
Pleas and the One Trial
37 of the 38 people (97%) pleaded guilty, and 1 was convicted after a trial. The median prison term after a guilty plea was 13 months. After a trial it was 24 months, based on 1 person, which is not enough to support any comparison.
Among the guilty pleas, 78% had a written plea agreement and 19% were straight pleas with no agreement. In all districts, 98% pleaded guilty.
Sentences and the Guideline Range
The guideline range is the sentence range calculated under the Sentencing Guidelines. 39% of sentences (15) were within it. 26% (10) were below it at the government's request, and 32% (12) were below it without a government request. 3% (1) was above it.
In all districts, 47% of sentences for this offense type were within the range. For all offenses in this district, 34% were.
Supervision, Fines, and Restitution
33 people (87%) were ordered to serve supervised release after prison, with a median term of 36 months. A fine was ordered for 6 (16%), and restitution for 21 (55%).
39% were in the lowest criminal history category, category I, and 18% were in the highest, category VI. Court-martial records have no criminal history field.
Small Counts by Year
Fiscal years 2016 to 2019 had 17 people, and fiscal years 2020 to 2025 had 21. The most in a single year was 9, in 2020. Several years have only 2 or 3 people, and the table has no rows for 2022.
Medians in the table range from 7 months to 24 months. With counts this small, the records cannot show a trend.
| Fiscal year | People sentenced | Median prison | Pleaded guilty |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 6 | 12 months | 6 of 6 |
| 2017 | 4 | 14.5 months | 4 of 4 |
| 2018 | 2 | 13.5 months | 2 of 2 |
| 2019 | 5 | 10.5 months | 5 of 5 |
| 2020 | 9 | 12 months | 9 of 9 |
| 2021 | 4 | 22.5 months | 4 of 4 |
| 2023 | 3 | 7 months | 3 of 3 |
| 2024 | 2 | 21 months | 1 of 2 |
| 2025 | 3 | 24 months | 3 of 3 |
Limits of the Data
These cases were less than 1% of the 5,462 people sentenced in the district. Only people who were convicted and sentenced are counted, so acquittals and dismissals are not in the data. Prison terms are the terms imposed, not time served.
How We Counted
Everyone sentenced in federal court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (U.S. Sentencing Commission district label "Penn. East") in fiscal years 2016 to 2025 whose offense type was "Forgery/Counter/Copyright" (38). Offense types are the Commission's OFFGUIDE categories.
Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records.
What to Keep in Mind
No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct. Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served.
Federal supervised release. Most federal prison sentences are followed by a term of supervised release that the judge sets as part of the sentence. A person who violates it can be sent back to prison. A court-martial cannot sentence anyone to supervision after release. Military parole and mandatory supervised release are decided later by a board, not by the judge at trial.
Who decides the sentence, and under what rules. Federal judges sentence every federal case. They must calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, which is advisory, and must impose any mandatory minimum the statute requires unless an exception applies. In courts-martial, the accused could choose sentencing by members until the rules changed. For cases in which every guilty finding is for an offense committed after December 27, 2023, a military judge sentences alone, within sentencing parameters. Courts-martial tried in 2024 and later include both old-rule and new-rule cases, and the data cannot tell them apart.
Time periods. Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually.
How life sentences and "time served" are counted. In the federal numbers, a life sentence is counted as 470 months, and any other sentence longer than 470 months is counted as just under 470 months. A sentence of "time served" is counted as one day (0.03 months). Averages are affected by these rules; medians much less.
Related Analysis
- Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System (the background article)
- Federal Prosecution Analysis (all federal posts)
- How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built (sources and method)
- Federal Sentences in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, FY2016–2025 (overview)
- Federal Drug Trafficking Sentences in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, FY2016–2025 (same district, other offense type)
- Federal Fraud, Theft, and Embezzlement Sentences in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, FY2016–2025 (same district, other offense type)
- Federal Firearms Sentences in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, FY2016–2025 (same district, other offense type)
- Federal Immigration Offense Sentences in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, FY2016–2025 (same district, other offense type)
- U.S. Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles (source)
- Federal Judicial Center, Integrated Database (criminal defendants) (source)
About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.