NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

Federal Firearms Sentences in the Northern District of Mississippi, FY2016–2025

In the Northern District of Mississippi, 337 people were sentenced for firearms offenses in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. The median prison term was 36 months, compared with 42 months for all 94 districts. 51% of sentences were within the guideline range, a little higher than the 45% for the district's

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › Federal Prosecution Analysis › Federal Sentences in the Northern District of Mississippi, F › Firearms: Northern District of Mississippi

In brief: In the Northern District of Mississippi, 337 people were sentenced for firearms offenses in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. The median prison term was 36 months, compared with 42 months for all 94 districts. 51% of sentences were within the guideline range, a little higher than the 45% for the district's cases overall.

Updated November 4, 2026 · Sources: U.S. Sentencing Commission and Federal Judicial Center, fiscal years 2016–2025

This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 337 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. It is part of the Federal Prosecution Analysis series, which builds on Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System. How the numbers were built: How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built.

Firearms Cases in the District's Caseload

Firearms cases were 21% of the 1,573 people sentenced in this district in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. The U.S. Sentencing Commission's offense type is "Firearms," and the Commission assigns it from the main guideline used at sentencing.

One guideline covered almost every case. §2K2.1 (Unlawful Receipt, Possession, or Transportation of Firearms or Ammunition) was the primary guideline for 334 of the 337 people.

The district sentenced 112 people in this offense type in fiscal years 2016 to 2019 and 225 people in fiscal years 2020 to 2025.

Prison Terms

300 of the 337 people (89%) received a prison term, and 31 (9%) received probation only. In all 94 districts, 94% of people in this offense type were sent to prison.

The median prison term was 36 months (3 years). A quarter received 60 months or more, and a quarter received 21 months or less. The median for all 94 districts was 42 months, which is higher. For all offenses in this district, the median was 36 months, the same as for firearms cases.

Prison terms are the terms imposed, not time served.

Sentences Against the Guideline Range

The records show the position for 336 people. 172 (51%) were sentenced within the range. 98 (29%) were below the range without a government request, and 46 (14%) were below the range at the government's request. 20 (6%) were above the range.

For all districts, 52% of firearms sentences were within the range. A mandatory minimum prison term applied to 19 of the 337 people with that information recorded (6%).

Guilty Pleas and Trials

332 of 337 people (99%) pleaded guilty, and 5 were convicted after a trial. In all districts, 97% pleaded guilty.

The median prison term was 36 months after a guilty plea and 65 months after a trial. The trial figure rests on 5 people. It describes this group only and does not show how any single trial would end.

Among the guilty pleas, more than 99% had a written plea agreement.

Supervised Release, Restitution, and Criminal History

Supervised release after prison was ordered for 293 people (87%), with a median term of 36 months. A fine was ordered for 5 people (1%), and restitution for 41 (12%).

In criminal history, 23% were in the lowest category, Category I, and 9% were in the highest, Category VI. Court-martial records have no criminal history field.

Counts and Medians by Year

The yearly count was lowest in fiscal year 2016, at 19 people, and highest in fiscal year 2023, at 52. The yearly median prison term ranged from 30 months to 42 months.

The table has all 10 years. A fiscal year begins on October 1 and ends the next September. Changes from one year to the next are modest and do not establish a trend.

Fiscal yearPeople sentencedMedian prisonPleaded guilty
20161935.6 months100%
20172030 months100%
20183633 months100%
20193730 months97%
20203933 months97%
20212238 months95%
20222930 months100%
20235242 months100%
20244537 months98%
20253841 months97%

About the Installation and the Data

Columbus AFB, Mississippi, is in this district and appears in this site's court-martial data. Courts-martial are held in military courts, not in this federal court, and nothing here links the base to these cases.

Only people who were convicted and sentenced are counted. Acquittals and dismissals are not in the Commission's data.

How We Counted

Everyone sentenced in federal court in the Northern District of Mississippi (U.S. Sentencing Commission district label "Mississippi North") in fiscal years 2016 to 2025 whose offense type was "Firearms" (337). Offense types are the Commission's OFFGUIDE categories.

Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records.

What to Keep in Mind

No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct. Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served.

Federal supervised release. Most federal prison sentences are followed by a term of supervised release that the judge sets as part of the sentence. A person who violates it can be sent back to prison. A court-martial cannot sentence anyone to supervision after release. Military parole and mandatory supervised release are decided later by a board, not by the judge at trial.

Who decides the sentence, and under what rules. Federal judges sentence every federal case. They must calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, which is advisory, and must impose any mandatory minimum the statute requires unless an exception applies. In courts-martial, the accused could choose sentencing by members until the rules changed. For cases in which every guilty finding is for an offense committed after December 27, 2023, a military judge sentences alone, within sentencing parameters. Courts-martial tried in 2024 and later include both old-rule and new-rule cases, and the data cannot tell them apart.

Time periods. Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually.

How life sentences and "time served" are counted. In the federal numbers, a life sentence is counted as 470 months, and any other sentence longer than 470 months is counted as just under 470 months. A sentence of "time served" is counted as one day (0.03 months). Averages are affected by these rules; medians much less.

Mandatory minimum sentences. Many federal statutes on drugs, images of child exploitation, child sex abuse, and firearms carry mandatory minimum prison terms. The UCMJ has mandatory minimums only for a few offenses (a dishonorable discharge or dismissal for rape and sexual assault, and life for premeditated murder). Federal sentences for these offenses are partly set by Congress, not by the judge.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top