Drug Use Convictions of NCOs (E-5 to E-9): Courts-Martial Compared With Federal Court
Among noncommissioned officers (E-5 to E-9), court-martial convictions for wrongful drug use (Article 112a) numbered 174 for trials from 2016 to 2025. Confinement was part of 76% of the sentences, and the median was 3 months. Federal law has no crime of drug use, so the federal side is simple posses
Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 9 min read
Trends › Federal Prosecution Analysis › Federal Law Has No Crime of Drug Use › Drug Use: NCOs
In brief: Among noncommissioned officers (E-5 to E-9), court-martial convictions for wrongful drug use (Article 112a) numbered 174 for trials from 2016 to 2025. Confinement was part of 76% of the sentences, and the median was 3 months. Federal law has no crime of drug use, so the federal side is simple possession, the nearest charge, and the match is not exact.
This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 6,268 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal years 2016 to 2025, compared with court-martial results from this site's Military Trial Results data (updated November 2, 2026). Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. It is part of the Federal Prosecution Analysis series, which builds on Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System. How the numbers were built: How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built.
How Often Did NCO Convictions Include Confinement?
The records list 174 convictions of NCOs, and 133 included confinement. That is 76%. For all ranks, the figure was 88% of 1,071 convictions.
The median adjudged confinement was 3 months, and a quarter of the sentences were 5.9 months or more.
Punitive Discharges for NCOs
Of the 174 NCOs convicted, 64 received a punitive discharge. That is 37%. The count is 8 dishonorable discharges and 56 bad-conduct discharges.
General courts-martial handled 26 of the convictions, or 15%.
Where Do NCO Cases Come From?
The Air Force has 131 of the 174 convictions. The Navy has 22, the Marine Corps 13, and the Army 8.
With so few Army and Marine Corps cases, the NCO figures say little about those services on their own. The NCO figures are mostly Air Force figures, and they should be read that way.
Plea Records and Sentences
A plea was recorded for 132 convictions, and 74 were guilty pleas, or 56%.
The median confinement after a guilty plea was 2.7 months, from 66 cases with confinement. In contested cases that ended in conviction it was 3 months, from 29 cases. These medians are close. A contested case is one where the accused pleaded not guilty or mixed pleas.
For trials in 2016 to 2019, the median was 3 months, from 59 cases with confinement. For trials in 2020 to 2025, it was 2.3 months, from 74 cases.
How Federal Simple Possession Compares
In federal court for fiscal years 2016 to 2025, 6,268 people were sentenced under 21 U.S.C. 844. Of them, 4,364 (70%) got prison, and 1,853 got probation only.
The median federal prison term was 6 months. After a guilty plea it was 6 months, and after a trial it was 84 months, based on 91 people. Of the 6,268, 6,160 pleaded guilty and 108 were convicted at trial.
The NCO confinement share of 76% is higher than the federal prison share of 70%. The NCO median of 3 months is lower than the federal median. The NCO guilty-plea share of 56% is lower than the federal 98%.
| Courts-martial: NCOs (E-5 to E-9) | Federal court, FY2016–FY2025 | |
|---|---|---|
| Convictions or people sentenced | 174 | 6,268 |
| Sentenced to confinement or prison | 76% | 70% |
| Median confinement or prison | 3 months | 6 months |
| A quarter received this or more | 5.9 months | 6 months |
| Pleaded guilty | 74 of 132 with a plea recorded (56%) | 98% |
| Mandatory minimum applied | See the caveats | 4% |
Limits of the Comparison
Rank is the rank at trial as listed in the court-martial record. Court-martial sentences are as adjudged, before clemency or appeal, while federal terms are imposed terms, not time served.
The records cannot show why NCO confinement shares differ from other ranks. They also cannot show how an NCO case would have been charged in federal court, and simple possession is not an exact match for wrongful use. This is not legal advice.
How We Counted
Courts-martial with trial dates in 2016 to 2025 ending in a conviction for wrongful drug use (Article 112a), compared with federal simple possession, the nearest federal charge where the accused was an NCO (e-5 to e-9) (174). Federal: 6,268 people sentenced under a conviction under 21 U.S.C. 844 (simple possession), the nearest federal charge (U.S. Sentencing Commission). Federal records have no rank; criminal history is the nearest federal measure of record, and courts-martial have no criminal history field.
Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records.
What to Keep in Mind
Who is in each set of numbers. The federal sentencing numbers come from the U.S. Sentencing Commission. They count only people who were convicted and sentenced in federal district court. People whose cases were dismissed or who were acquitted are not in them. The military numbers come from court-martial results, which include acquittals. To compare acquittal or dismissal rates, the federal side uses a different source: the Federal Judicial Center's case data, which counts every defendant whose case ended.
Different cases reach each system. Federal prosecutors bring a narrow set of cases. In fiscal year 2024, immigration and drug trafficking cases were 59% of everyone sentenced in federal court (36,664 of 61,678). Many crimes that the military prosecutes, such as most assaults, most sexual assaults between adults, and drug use, are usually state crimes for civilians and reach federal court only in special situations, such as on federal land or in Indian Country. A federal case and a court-martial for the same crime can involve different kinds of facts.
Time periods. Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually.
Offense categories do not line up exactly. Each comparison uses a federal offense group chosen to match the military article as closely as possible (see the crosswalk). Some matches are close; others are partial. The post says which federal guideline or statute was used and why it is not an exact match.
Drug use has no federal counterpart. Federal law does not make drug use a crime. A positive drug test is not a federal offense; a civilian can be charged only with possessing the drug. Bringing drugs onto a military installation is also a military-only offense. For these, the nearest federal charge is simple possession, and the post says that the match is not exact.
No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct. Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served.
Military confinement credit and parole. For military sentences adjudged after 2004, good conduct time is 5 days for each month of confinement, about 16%. Military prisoners can also earn up to 8 more days a month for work and programs and up to 2 days a month for special acts, with a limit of 15 days a month in total. Military prisoners can be considered for parole by their service's clemency and parole board. The military numbers in this post are the confinement adjudged at trial, not the time served.
Military sentences include punishments federal sentences do not. A court-martial sentence can include a punitive discharge (bad-conduct discharge, dishonorable discharge, or dismissal for officers), reduction in rank, and forfeiture of pay. These have no federal counterpart. A comparison of months of confinement leaves them out. A short confinement term combined with a dishonorable discharge is a heavier sentence than the months alone show.
Federal supervised release. Most federal prison sentences are followed by a term of supervised release that the judge sets as part of the sentence. A person who violates it can be sent back to prison. A court-martial cannot sentence anyone to supervision after release. Military parole and mandatory supervised release are decided later by a board, not by the judge at trial.
Who decides the sentence, and under what rules. Federal judges sentence every federal case. They must calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, which is advisory, and must impose any mandatory minimum the statute requires unless an exception applies. In courts-martial, the accused could choose sentencing by members until the rules changed. For cases in which every guilty finding is for an offense committed after December 27, 2023, a military judge sentences alone, within sentencing parameters. Courts-martial tried in 2024 and later include both old-rule and new-rule cases, and the data cannot tell them apart.
How life sentences and "time served" are counted. In the federal numbers, a life sentence is counted as 470 months, and any other sentence longer than 470 months is counted as just under 470 months. A sentence of "time served" is counted as one day (0.03 months). Averages are affected by these rules; medians much less.
Related Analysis
- Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System (the background article)
- Federal Prosecution Analysis (all federal posts)
- How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built (sources and method)
- Federal Law Has No Crime of Drug Use: How Article 112a Cases Compare (overview)
- Drug Use Convictions of Junior Enlisted (E-1 to E-4): Courts-Martial Compared With Federal Court
- Drug Use Convictions of Officers and Warrant Officers: Courts-Martial Compared With Federal Court
- Drug Use Sentences Since the 2023 Military Sentencing Reform: What the Data Shows So Far
- Guilty Pleas in Drug Use Cases: Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial
- Drug Use: Sentences After a Guilty Plea vs. After Trial, Federal Court and Courts-Martial
- Drug Use: Federal Sentences vs. Air Force Courts-Martial, 2016–2025
- Are Courts-Martial More Likely to End in Acquittal Than Federal Trials? (related comparison)
- Guilty Pleas in Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial, Year by Year (related comparison)
- Child Pornography Sentences: Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial, 2016–2025 (related comparison)
- Drug Distribution and Importation: Federal vs. Court-Martial Sentences, 2016–2025 (related comparison)
- Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Federal Cases vs. Article 120 Courts-Martial (related comparison)
- Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement: Federal Cases vs. Article 120b Courts-Martial (related comparison)
- Theft and Fraud by Dollar Loss: Federal Sentences vs. Article 121 Courts-Martial (related comparison)
- Army Article 112a Cases by the Numbers, 2021–2025 (court-martial data)
- What Sentence Follows an Army Drug Conviction? (court-martial data)
- How Often Are Contested Army Article 112a Cases Acquitted? (court-martial data)
- Guilty Pleas in Army Drug Cases: How Often, and What Came Next (court-martial data)
- Are Air Force Drug Courts-Martial Disappearing? Article 112a, 2016–2025 (court-martial data)
- How Much Confinement for an Article 112a Conviction in the Air Force? (court-martial data)
- Pleading Guilty to Article 112a in the Air Force: What Sentences Followed? (court-martial data)
- Is Navy-Marine Corps Drug Prosecution Rising or Falling? Article 112a, 2017–2025 (court-martial data)
- How Much Confinement for an Article 112a Conviction in the Navy-Marine Corps? (court-martial data)
- Fighting a Navy-Marine Corps Drug Charge: How Contested Cases Ended (court-martial data)
- When Navy-Marine Corps Accused Plead Guilty to Drug (court-martial data)
- Article 112a (Wrongful Use, Possession of Controlled Substances): Court-Martial Data and Trends (court-martial data)
- Article 112a UCMJ Drug Offenses and Positive Urinalysis (law firm reference page)
- U.S. Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles (source)
- Federal Judicial Center, Integrated Database (criminal defendants) (source)
About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.