Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement Sentences in 2022: Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial
Federal court sentenced 607 people for child-victim sexual abuse, enticement, and travel offenses in fiscal year 2022, more than in any other year from 2016 to 2025, with a median prison term of 120 months (10 years). Courts-martial with 2022 trial dates recorded 58 convictions for sexual offenses a
Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 9 min read
Trends › Federal Prosecution Analysis › Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement › Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement: 2022
In brief: Federal court sentenced 607 people for child-victim sexual abuse, enticement, and travel offenses in fiscal year 2022, more than in any other year from 2016 to 2025, with a median prison term of 120 months (10 years). Courts-martial with 2022 trial dates recorded 58 convictions for sexual offenses against a child, and the median adjudged confinement was 36 months (3 years).
This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 607 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal year 2022, compared with court-martial results from this site's Military Trial Results data (updated November 2, 2026). Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. It is part of the Federal Prosecution Analysis series, which builds on Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System. How the numbers were built: How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built.
The Highest Federal Count in the Series
Federal fiscal year 2022 ran from October 1, 2021 to September 30, 2022. In that year, 607 people were sentenced under guideline §2G1.3 (enticement, transportation, and travel offenses involving a minor) or under §2A3.1 to §2A3.4 with a child-victim statute. No other fiscal year in the table had more.
The median prison term was still 120 months. The records do not show why more people were sentenced that year.
| Fiscal year | People sentenced | Median prison | Pleaded guilty |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 503 | 120 months | 86% |
| 2017 | 494 | 120 months | 90% |
| 2018 | 499 | 120 months | 90% |
| 2019 | 495 | 120 months | 89% |
| 2020 | 386 | 120 months | 87% |
| 2021 | 429 | 120 months | 89% |
| 2022 | 607 | 120 months | 86% |
| 2023 | 546 | 120 months | 83% |
| 2024 | 544 | 121 months | 85% |
| 2025 | 468 | 120 months | 90% |
Mandatory Minimums and the Guideline Range
A mandatory minimum is a prison term set by statute that a judge generally cannot go below. One applied to 385 of the 607 people sentenced in fiscal year 2022 (64%).
46% of sentences were within the guideline range. 26% were below the range at the government's request, 20% below it without a government request, and 7% above it. 15 people received a life sentence.
In criminal history, 64% were in category I and 4% in category VI. Court-martial records have no criminal history field, so this has no military counterpart.
Court-Martial Sentences in 2022
The 58 military convictions under Article 120b came from the Army (34), the Air Force (13), the Marine Corps (7), and the Navy (4). They are counted by trial date in calendar year 2022.
53 of the 58 convictions with a sentence recorded included confinement (91%). The median was 36 months, and a quarter received 84 months or more. 57 of the 58 convictions (98%) were at a general court-martial.
Comparing Confinement With Prison Terms
Federal court sent 605 of the 607 people to prison (more than 99%). 2 received probation only. A quarter of federal prison terms were 188 months or more, and a quarter were 87 months or less. Those lower federal terms were still longer than the court-martial median of 36 months.
The numbers are measured at different points. Court-martial sentences are as adjudged at trial, before clemency or appeal. Federal prison terms are as imposed, not as served.
| Courts-martial, 2022 | Federal court, FY2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Convictions or people sentenced | 58 | 607 |
| Sentenced to confinement or prison | 91% | more than 99% |
| Median confinement or prison | 36 months | 120 months |
| A quarter received this or more | 84 months | 188 months |
| Pleaded guilty | 42 of 56 with a plea recorded (75%) | 86% |
| Mandatory minimum applied | See the caveats | 385 of 606 with the information (64%) |
Pleas and Trials in Both Systems
At courts-martial, 42 of 56 convictions with a plea recorded (75%) were guilty pleas. Their median confinement was 42 months, across 41 cases with confinement. Contested cases ending in conviction had a lower median of 33 months, across only 10 cases with confinement, which is a small group.
In federal court, 521 of 607 (86%) pleaded guilty and 86 were convicted after a trial. The median prison term was 120 months after a guilty plea and 194 months after a trial. 91% of federal guilty pleas had a written plea agreement.
Discharges, Supervision, and Restitution
Of the 56 enlisted members convicted at courts-martial, 53 received a punitive discharge (95%): 38 dishonorable and 15 bad-conduct. Both officers convicted were dismissed.
On the federal side, 602 people (more than 99%) were ordered to serve supervised release after prison, with a median term of 120 months. 121 (20%) received it for life. Restitution was ordered for 134 (22%) and a fine for 34 (6%).
Context and Limits
Across all trial years from 2016 to 2025, the 605 court-martial convictions had a median confinement of 36 months, the same as in 2022. All 4,971 federal sentences from fiscal years 2016 to 2025 had a median prison term of 120 months.
The military side counts convictions and the federal side counts people, and their years do not match. The records give no detail on the conduct in each case or on why a sentence was chosen.
How We Counted
Courts-martial with a trial date in 2022 ending in a conviction for sexual offenses against a child (Article 120b; federal child-victim sexual abuse, enticement, and travel offenses) (58). Federal: people sentenced in fiscal year 2022 under guideline §2G1.3 (enticement, transportation, and travel offenses involving a minor) plus §2A3.1 to §2A3.4 cases with a child-victim statute (607), U.S. Sentencing Commission.
Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records.
What to Keep in Mind
Who is in each set of numbers. The federal sentencing numbers come from the U.S. Sentencing Commission. They count only people who were convicted and sentenced in federal district court. People whose cases were dismissed or who were acquitted are not in them. The military numbers come from court-martial results, which include acquittals. To compare acquittal or dismissal rates, the federal side uses a different source: the Federal Judicial Center's case data, which counts every defendant whose case ended.
Different cases reach each system. Federal prosecutors bring a narrow set of cases. In fiscal year 2024, immigration and drug trafficking cases were 59% of everyone sentenced in federal court (36,664 of 61,678). Many crimes that the military prosecutes, such as most assaults, most sexual assaults between adults, and drug use, are usually state crimes for civilians and reach federal court only in special situations, such as on federal land or in Indian Country. A federal case and a court-martial for the same crime can involve different kinds of facts.
No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct. Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served.
Military confinement credit and parole. For military sentences adjudged after 2004, good conduct time is 5 days for each month of confinement, about 16%. Military prisoners can also earn up to 8 more days a month for work and programs and up to 2 days a month for special acts, with a limit of 15 days a month in total. Military prisoners can be considered for parole by their service's clemency and parole board. The military numbers in this post are the confinement adjudged at trial, not the time served.
Military sentences include punishments federal sentences do not. A court-martial sentence can include a punitive discharge (bad-conduct discharge, dishonorable discharge, or dismissal for officers), reduction in rank, and forfeiture of pay. These have no federal counterpart. A comparison of months of confinement leaves them out. A short confinement term combined with a dishonorable discharge is a heavier sentence than the months alone show.
Time periods. Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually.
Offense categories do not line up exactly. Each comparison uses a federal offense group chosen to match the military article as closely as possible (see the crosswalk). Some matches are close; others are partial. The post says which federal guideline or statute was used and why it is not an exact match.
Mandatory minimum sentences. Many federal statutes on drugs, images of child exploitation, child sex abuse, and firearms carry mandatory minimum prison terms. The UCMJ has mandatory minimums only for a few offenses (a dishonorable discharge or dismissal for rape and sexual assault, and life for premeditated murder). Federal sentences for these offenses are partly set by Congress, not by the judge.
Related Analysis
- Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System (the background article)
- Federal Prosecution Analysis (all federal posts)
- How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built (sources and method)
- Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement: Federal Cases vs. Article 120b Courts-Martial (overview)
- Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement Sentences in 2021: Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial (previous or next year)
- Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement Sentences in 2023: Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial (previous or next year)
- Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement Sentences Since the 2023 Military Sentencing Reform: What the Data Shows So Far
- Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement: Federal Sentences vs. Air Force Courts-Martial, 2016–2025
- Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement: Federal Sentences vs. Army Courts-Martial
- Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement: Federal Sentences vs. Marine Corps Courts-Martial
- Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement: Federal Sentences vs. Navy Courts-Martial, 2016–2025
- Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement: Courts-Martial at Bremerton vs. Federal Court in the Western District of Washington
- Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement: Courts-Martial at Camp Lejeune vs. Federal Court in the Eastern District of North Carolina
- Child Sexual Abuse and Enticement: Courts-Martial at Camp Pendleton vs. Federal Court in the Southern District of California
- Fewer or More? Child Sexual Abuse Charges at Army Courts-Martial, 2021–2025 (court-martial data)
- How Much Confinement for an Article 120b Conviction in the Army? (court-martial data)
- How Often Are Contested Army Article 120b Cases Acquitted? (court-martial data)
- Pleading Guilty to Article 120b in the Army: What Sentences Followed? (court-martial data)
- How Has Article 120b Changed in Air Force Courts-Martial Since 2016? (court-martial data)
- How Much Confinement for an Article 120b Conviction in the Air Force? (court-martial data)
- Guilty Pleas in Air Force Child Sexual Abuse Cases: How Often, and What Came Next (court-martial data)
- Fewer or More? Child Sexual Abuse Charges at Navy-Marine Corps Courts-Martial, 2017–2025 (court-martial data)
- What Sentence Follows a Navy-Marine Corps Child Sexual Abuse Conviction? (court-martial data)
- Fighting a Navy-Marine Corps Child Sexual Abuse Charge: How Contested Cases Ended (court-martial data)
- Guilty Pleas in Navy-Marine Corps Child Sexual Abuse Cases: How Often, and What Came Next (court-martial data)
- Article 120b (Rape and Sexual Assault of a Child): Court-Martial Data and Trends (court-martial data)
- Article 120b UCMJ: Rape and Sexual Assault of a Child (law firm reference page)
- U.S. Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles (source)
- Federal Judicial Center, Integrated Database (criminal defendants) (source)
About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.