NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

Federal Child Pornography Sentences in the Southern District of Georgia, FY2016–2025

All 81 people sentenced in the "Child Pornography" offense type (child pornography, or images of child exploitation) in the Southern District of Georgia in fiscal years 2016 to 2025 received a prison term. The median was 84 months (7 years), compared with 90 months across all 94 federal districts.

· Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › Federal Prosecution Analysis › Federal Sentences in the Southern District of Georgia, FY201 › Child Pornography: Southern District of Georgia

In brief: All 81 people sentenced in the "Child Pornography" offense type (child pornography, or images of child exploitation) in the Southern District of Georgia in fiscal years 2016 to 2025 received a prison term. The median was 84 months (7 years), compared with 90 months across all 94 federal districts.

Updated November 4, 2026 · Sources: U.S. Sentencing Commission and Federal Judicial Center, fiscal years 2016–2025

This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 81 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. It is part of the Federal Prosecution Analysis series, which builds on Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System. How the numbers were built: How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built.

Prison Terms for All 81 People

81 of the 81 people (100%) received a prison term, and none received probation only. The median was 84 months (7 years). A quarter received 120 months or more, and a quarter received 64 months or less.

The terms are those imposed, not time served. A mandatory minimum prison term applied to 33 of the 81 people (41%).

Comparison With All Districts and With the District's Other Cases

Nationally, 13,674 people were sentenced in this offense type. 99% were sent to prison, and the median prison term was 90 months. Guilty pleas were 97%.

The median here was lower than the national median and higher than the district's median of 48 months for all offenses. These cases were 2% of the 4,115 people sentenced in the district.

What the Offense Type Covers

The Commission's category is called "Child Pornography," and the material is also described as images of child exploitation. All 81 people had §2G2.2 (Trafficking in Material Involving the Sexual Exploitation of a Minor) as the primary guideline.

These records do not break the cases down further, for example by the number of images or by possession versus distribution.

Sentences Against the Guideline Range

48% of the sentences (39) were within the guideline range. 10% (8) were below the range at the government's request, and 42% (34) were below the range without a government request. None were above the range.

Nationally, 32% of sentences in this offense type were within the range, so the within-range share here was higher. For all offenses in the district, it was 71%.

Pleas and Trials

79 of the 81 people (98%) pleaded guilty, and 2 were convicted after a trial. The median prison term was 84 months after a guilty plea and 150 months after a trial. The trial figure rests on 2 people.

Among guilty pleas, 95% had a written plea agreement and 5% were straight pleas with no agreement.

Long Supervised Release, Fines, and Restitution

80 people (99%) were ordered to serve supervised release after prison. The median term was 180 months, and 6 people (7%) received supervised release for life.

A fine was ordered for 22 people (27%), and restitution for 48 (59%). In criminal history, 83% were in category I, the lowest, and 1% were in category VI, the highest. Court-martial records have no criminal history field.

Counts and Medians by Fiscal Year

The district sentenced 32 people in fiscal years 2016 to 2019 and 49 people in fiscal years 2020 to 2025. Yearly counts were between 3 and 11 people.

Yearly medians ranged from 41 months in fiscal year 2016 to 138.5 months in fiscal year 2023. With groups this small, the table shows a range of values and not a trend. A fiscal year starts on October 1.

Fiscal yearPeople sentencedMedian prisonPleaded guilty
2016741 months7 of 7
2017870 months8 of 8
20181081 months100%
2019792 months7 of 7
2020978 months9 of 9
2021968 months9 of 9
202211120 months91%
202310138.5 months90%
20243110 months3 of 3
2025797 months7 of 7

Limits of the Records

The Commission lists only people who were convicted and sentenced. People who were acquitted or whose cases were dismissed are absent. Fort Gordon and Fort Stewart are in this district. Military courts try courts-martial, not this federal court, and these numbers do not describe them.

How We Counted

Everyone sentenced in federal court in the Southern District of Georgia (U.S. Sentencing Commission district label "Georgia South") in fiscal years 2016 to 2025 whose offense type was "Child Pornography" (81). Offense types are the Commission's OFFGUIDE categories.

Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records.

What to Keep in Mind

No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct. Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served.

Federal supervised release. Most federal prison sentences are followed by a term of supervised release that the judge sets as part of the sentence. A person who violates it can be sent back to prison. A court-martial cannot sentence anyone to supervision after release. Military parole and mandatory supervised release are decided later by a board, not by the judge at trial.

Who decides the sentence, and under what rules. Federal judges sentence every federal case. They must calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, which is advisory, and must impose any mandatory minimum the statute requires unless an exception applies. In courts-martial, the accused could choose sentencing by members until the rules changed. For cases in which every guilty finding is for an offense committed after December 27, 2023, a military judge sentences alone, within sentencing parameters. Courts-martial tried in 2024 and later include both old-rule and new-rule cases, and the data cannot tell them apart.

Time periods. Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually.

How life sentences and "time served" are counted. In the federal numbers, a life sentence is counted as 470 months, and any other sentence longer than 470 months is counted as just under 470 months. A sentence of "time served" is counted as one day (0.03 months). Averages are affected by these rules; medians much less.

Mandatory minimum sentences. Many federal statutes on drugs, images of child exploitation, child sex abuse, and firearms carry mandatory minimum prison terms. The UCMJ has mandatory minimums only for a few offenses (a dishonorable discharge or dismissal for rape and sexual assault, and life for premeditated murder). Federal sentences for these offenses are partly set by Congress, not by the judge.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top