NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

Federal Child Pornography Sentences in the District of Nebraska, FY2016–2025

277 people were sentenced for child pornography (images of child exploitation) offenses in the District of Nebraska in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. The median prison term was 84 months, compared with 90 months in all 94 federal districts. A mandatory minimum applied to 74%, and 44% were sentenced belo

· Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › Federal Prosecution Analysis › Federal Sentences in the District of Nebraska, FY2016–2025 › Child Pornography: District of Nebraska

In brief: 277 people were sentenced for child pornography (images of child exploitation) offenses in the District of Nebraska in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. The median prison term was 84 months, compared with 90 months in all 94 federal districts. A mandatory minimum applied to 74%, and 44% were sentenced below the guideline range at the government's request.

Updated November 4, 2026 · Sources: U.S. Sentencing Commission and Federal Judicial Center, fiscal years 2016–2025

This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 277 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. It is part of the Federal Prosecution Analysis series, which builds on Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System. How the numbers were built: How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built.

Mandatory Minimums and Sentences Below the Range

A mandatory minimum prison term applied to 205 of the 277 people (74%). Even so, 122 people (44%) were sentenced below the guideline range at the government's request, and 82 people (30%) were sentenced below it without a government request.

63 people (23%) were within the range, and 10 (4%) were above it. For all districts together, 32% of child pornography sentences were within the range. For all offenses in the District of Nebraska, the figure was 48%.

Length of Prison Terms

276 of the 277 people (more than 99%) received a prison term, and 1 received probation only. The median prison term was 84 months, or 7 years. A quarter received 120 months or more, and a quarter received 60 months or less.

The median for all offenses in this district was 57 months, so child pornography cases carried longer terms than the district's cases overall. The term for the offense type in all districts was 90 months.

Plea Versus Trial

268 people (97%) pleaded guilty, and 9 were convicted after a trial. The median prison term after a guilty plea was 84 months. After a trial it was 219.5 months, based on 8 people sent to prison.

85% of those who pleaded guilty had a written plea agreement, and 15% were straight pleas. The trial group is small, so its median describes only those 8 people.

Terms by Fiscal Year

The yearly table runs by fiscal year, which starts October 1 and ends at the close of September. The median prison term was 63 months in fiscal year 2016 and 111.5 months in fiscal year 2025.

97 people were sentenced in fiscal years 2016 to 2019 and 180 in fiscal years 2020 to 2025. The records show these counts and medians. They do not show what accounts for the differences between years, and yearly groups of 19 to 39 people are small.

Fiscal yearPeople sentencedMedian prisonPleaded guilty
20163263 months97%
20172560 months100%
20182172 months100%
20191978 months89%
20201990 months95%
20213672 months100%
20222790 months96%
202339108 months95%
202435100 months97%
202524111.5 months96%

The Offense Type and Its Guideline

"Child Pornography" is the U.S. Sentencing Commission's offense type for cases involving child pornography, also called images of child exploitation. Every one of the 277 cases used the same primary guideline, §2G2.2 (Trafficking in Material Involving the Sexual Exploitation of a Minor).

These cases were 6% of the 4,887 people sentenced in the District of Nebraska over the 10 fiscal years.

Supervised Release, Restitution, and Criminal History

276 people (more than 99%) were ordered to serve supervised release after prison, with a median term of 66 months. 12 people (4%) received supervised release for life.

Restitution was ordered for 129 people (47%), and a fine for 3. 72% of the people were in the lowest criminal history category, and 3% were in the highest. Court-martial records have no criminal history field.

What the Records Cannot Show

The Commission data counts only people who were convicted and sentenced. Acquittals and dismissals are not in it. Prison terms are the terms imposed, not time served, and the data gives no facts about any case.

Offutt AFB, Nebraska, is in this district and appears in this site's court-martial data. Courts-martial are tried in military courts, not in this federal district court.

How We Counted

Everyone sentenced in federal court in the District of Nebraska (U.S. Sentencing Commission district label "Nebraska") in fiscal years 2016 to 2025 whose offense type was "Child Pornography" (277). Offense types are the Commission's OFFGUIDE categories.

Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records.

What to Keep in Mind

No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct. Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served.

Federal supervised release. Most federal prison sentences are followed by a term of supervised release that the judge sets as part of the sentence. A person who violates it can be sent back to prison. A court-martial cannot sentence anyone to supervision after release. Military parole and mandatory supervised release are decided later by a board, not by the judge at trial.

Who decides the sentence, and under what rules. Federal judges sentence every federal case. They must calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, which is advisory, and must impose any mandatory minimum the statute requires unless an exception applies. In courts-martial, the accused could choose sentencing by members until the rules changed. For cases in which every guilty finding is for an offense committed after December 27, 2023, a military judge sentences alone, within sentencing parameters. Courts-martial tried in 2024 and later include both old-rule and new-rule cases, and the data cannot tell them apart.

Time periods. Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually.

How life sentences and "time served" are counted. In the federal numbers, a life sentence is counted as 470 months, and any other sentence longer than 470 months is counted as just under 470 months. A sentence of "time served" is counted as one day (0.03 months). Averages are affected by these rules; medians much less.

Mandatory minimum sentences. Many federal statutes on drugs, images of child exploitation, child sex abuse, and firearms carry mandatory minimum prison terms. The UCMJ has mandatory minimums only for a few offenses (a dishonorable discharge or dismissal for rape and sexual assault, and life for premeditated murder). Federal sentences for these offenses are partly set by Congress, not by the judge.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top