NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

Federal Bribery and Corruption Sentences in the District of Puerto Rico, FY2016–2025

In fiscal years 2016 to 2025, 70 people were sentenced in the District of Puerto Rico for bribery and corruption offenses. 50 (71%) received a prison term, with a median of 24 months. 46% of sentences were below the guideline range at the government's request, and 31% were within the range.

· Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 7 min read

Trends › Federal Prosecution Analysis › Federal Sentences in the District of Puerto Rico, FY2016–202 › Bribery and Corruption: District of Puerto Rico

In brief: In fiscal years 2016 to 2025, 70 people were sentenced in the District of Puerto Rico for bribery and corruption offenses. 50 (71%) received a prison term, with a median of 24 months. 46% of sentences were below the guideline range at the government's request, and 31% were within the range.

Updated November 4, 2026 · Sources: U.S. Sentencing Commission and Federal Judicial Center, fiscal years 2016–2025

This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 70 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. It is part of the Federal Prosecution Analysis series, which builds on Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System. How the numbers were built: How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built.

Sentences Below the Guideline Range at the Government's Request

The guideline range was recorded for all 70 people. Of those, 32 (46%) were sentenced below the range at the government's request. Another 15 (21%) were sentenced below the range without a government request, and 22 (31%) were within it. One person (1%) was sentenced above the range.

For all 94 federal districts, 21% of sentences for this offense type were within the range. For all offenses in the District of Puerto Rico, 54% were. Bribery and corruption cases in this district were therefore within the range less often than the district's cases as a whole, but more often than in all districts together.

Prison Terms and Probation

Of the 70 people, 50 (71%) were sent to prison and 19 (27%) received probation only, with no prison or other confinement. For all districts, 74% were sent to prison.

The median prison term in Puerto Rico was 24 months (2 years). A quarter received 44.8 months or more, and a quarter received 12.5 months or less. The median for all districts was 18 months, and the median for all offenses in this district was 60 months.

How Many Went to Trial?

61 of the 70 people (87%) pleaded guilty, and 9 were convicted after a trial. For all districts, 91% pleaded guilty, and for all offenses in Puerto Rico the rate was 98%. Among guilty pleas, 95% had a written plea agreement and 5% were straight pleas.

The median prison term after a guilty plea was 24 months. After a trial it was 63 months, based on 9 people convicted at trial and sent to prison. The group is small, and the records do not show how serious each case was, so the gap cannot be traced to the plea itself.

What Bribery/Corruption Means in the Commission's Data

"Bribery/Corruption" is the U.S. Sentencing Commission's offense type, assigned from the primary guideline in each case. The most common was §2C1.1 (Offering, Giving, Soliciting, or Receiving a Bribe), used for 65 people.

Other guidelines appeared, each for very few people: §2C1.2 (Offering, Giving, Soliciting, or Receiving a Gratuity) for 2, §2C1.3 (Conflict of Interest) for 1, and §2B4.1 (Bribery in Procurement of Bank Loan and Other Commercial Bribery) for 1. These cases were less than 1% of the 9,794 people sentenced in the district.

Mandatory Minimums, Release, Fines, and Restitution

A mandatory minimum prison term applied to 5 of the 70 people (7%). Supervised release after prison was ordered for 47 (67%), with a median term of 36 months.

A fine was ordered for 11 people (16%), and restitution for 28 (40%). In criminal history, 97% were in the lowest category and 0% in the highest. Court-martial records have no criminal history field.

Counts by Year and Limits of the Data

Fiscal years 2016 to 2019 had 26 people, and fiscal years 2020 to 2025 had 44. Yearly counts range from 2 to 12, and the table shows "n/a" for a median in years with too few prison sentences. Single years are small and are not trends.

The data counts only people who were convicted and sentenced, so acquittals and dismissals are missing. Prison terms are those imposed, not time served. The records cannot show why sentences were below the range or why the yearly figures differ.

Fiscal yearPeople sentencedMedian prisonPleaded guilty
2016518 months5 of 5
20171222.5 months92%
2018627 months5 of 6
2019321 months3 of 3
20202n/a2 of 2
2021741 months4 of 7
20221230 months92%
20231227 months92%
2024730 months5 of 7
20254n/a4 of 4

How We Counted

Everyone sentenced in federal court in the District of Puerto Rico (U.S. Sentencing Commission district label "Puerto Rico") in fiscal years 2016 to 2025 whose offense type was "Bribery/Corruption" (70). Offense types are the Commission's OFFGUIDE categories.

Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records.

What to Keep in Mind

No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct. Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served.

Federal supervised release. Most federal prison sentences are followed by a term of supervised release that the judge sets as part of the sentence. A person who violates it can be sent back to prison. A court-martial cannot sentence anyone to supervision after release. Military parole and mandatory supervised release are decided later by a board, not by the judge at trial.

Who decides the sentence, and under what rules. Federal judges sentence every federal case. They must calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, which is advisory, and must impose any mandatory minimum the statute requires unless an exception applies. In courts-martial, the accused could choose sentencing by members until the rules changed. For cases in which every guilty finding is for an offense committed after December 27, 2023, a military judge sentences alone, within sentencing parameters. Courts-martial tried in 2024 and later include both old-rule and new-rule cases, and the data cannot tell them apart.

Time periods. Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually.

How life sentences and "time served" are counted. In the federal numbers, a life sentence is counted as 470 months, and any other sentence longer than 470 months is counted as just under 470 months. A sentence of "time served" is counted as one day (0.03 months). Averages are affected by these rules; medians much less.

Mandatory minimum sentences. Many federal statutes on drugs, images of child exploitation, child sex abuse, and firearms carry mandatory minimum prison terms. The UCMJ has mandatory minimums only for a few offenses (a dishonorable discharge or dismissal for rape and sexual assault, and life for premeditated murder). Federal sentences for these offenses are partly set by Congress, not by the judge.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top