> ## Content Index > Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.bodiesburied.com/llms.txt > Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further. # Sexual Abuse of an Adult Sentences in 2025: Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial - URL: https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal-adult-sexual-abuse-sentences-vs-courts-martial-2025/ - Published: 2026-11-03T06:09:50.000Z - Updated: 2026-11-03T06:09:50.000Z - Description: The median federal prison term for sexual abuse of an adult in fiscal year 2025 was 90 months (7.5 years), across 53 people sentenced. Courts-martial recorded 49 convictions for this offense with 2025 trial dates, with a median confinement of 34.3 months. In federal court, 23% of these sentences wer - Author: Jocelyn C. Stewart - Tags: Understanding Trends, Federal [Trends](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/) › [Federal Prosecution Analysis](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal/) › [Sexual Abuse of an Adult](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal-sexual-abuse-adult-vs-article-120/) › Sexual Abuse of an Adult: 2025 **In brief:** The median federal prison term for sexual abuse of an adult in fiscal year 2025 was 90 months (7.5 years), across 53 people sentenced. Courts-martial recorded 49 convictions for this offense with 2025 trial dates, with a median confinement of 34.3 months. In federal court, 23% of these sentences were above the guideline range. Updated November 3, 2026 · Sources: U.S. Sentencing Commission and Federal Judicial Center, fiscal years 2016–2025 · Military Trial Results This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 53 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal year 2025, compared with court-martial results from this site's Military Trial Results data (updated November 2, 2026). Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025\. It is part of the [Federal Prosecution Analysis](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal/) series, which builds on [Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/military-sentencing-guidelines-federal-system/). How the numbers were built: [How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal-data-methodology/). ## Federal Court in Fiscal Year 2025 Fiscal year 2025 ran from October 1, 2024 to September 30, 2025\. The federal group is people sentenced under guideline §2A3.1 or §2A3.4 where the statute of conviction shows an adult victim (18 U.S.C. 2241(a)/(b), 2242, 2244). 51 of the 53 (96%) received a prison term, and 2 (4%) received probation only. Among those sent to prison, a quarter received 207 months or more, and a quarter received 33 months or less. 1 person received a life sentence. These are prison terms imposed, not time served. For all fiscal years from 2016 to 2025, the federal median was 74 months across 531 people. The 2025 median of 90 months is higher than that all-years figure. | Fiscal year | People sentenced | Median prison | Pleaded guilty | | ----------- | ---------------- | ------------- | -------------- | | 2016 | 63 | 70 months | 83% | | 2017 | 58 | 70 months | 95% | | 2018 | 41 | 60 months | 95% | | 2019 | 64 | 85.5 months | 86% | | 2020 | 40 | 102 months | 83% | | 2021 | 45 | 84 months | 87% | | 2022 | 59 | 61.5 months | 88% | | 2023 | 55 | 72 months | 85% | | 2024 | 53 | 65 months | 81% | | 2025 | 53 | 90 months | 89% | ## Above, Below, or Within the Guideline Range 12 of the 53 federal sentences (23%) were above the guideline range. 27 (51%) were within it. Below-range sentences numbered 7 (13%) at the government's request and 7 (13%) without one. A mandatory minimum prison term applied to 2 people (4%). In criminal history, 62% were in category I and 4% in category VI. Court-martial records include no criminal history field. ## How Did the 2025 Court-Martial Sentences Compare? The 49 court-martial convictions were for Article 120 rape, sexual assault, and abusive sexual contact, counted by trial date in calendar year 2025\. The Army had 28, the Air Force 12, the Navy 3, and the Marine Corps 6. 45 of the 49 convictions with a sentence recorded (92%) included confinement. The median confinement of 34.3 months equals 2.9 years. A quarter received 81.7 months or more, and 1 received confinement for life. These are adjudged sentences, before any clemency or appeal. With 49 convictions, this is a small group for one year. The all-years court-martial median was 24 months across 901 convictions with trial dates from 2016 to 2025. | | Courts-martial, 2025 | Federal court, FY2025 | | ---------------------------------- | ----------------------------------- | --------------------------------- | | Convictions or people sentenced | 49 | 53 | | Sentenced to confinement or prison | 92% | 96% | | Median confinement or prison | 34.3 months | 90 months | | A quarter received this or more | 81.7 months | 207 months | | Pleaded guilty | 22 of 47 with a plea recorded (47%) | 89% | | Mandatory minimum applied | See the caveats | 2 of 53 with the information (4%) | ## Plea Patterns 22 of the 47 court-martial convictions with a plea recorded (47%) were guilty pleas. The median confinement after a guilty plea was 30 months, and in contested cases ending in conviction it was 32.5 months. Each group had 21 cases with confinement. In federal court, 47 of 53 (89%) pleaded guilty and 6 were convicted after a trial. The median prison term after a guilty plea was 90 months. After a trial it was 168 months, based on 6 people. 91% of the federal guilty pleas had a written plea agreement, and 9% were straight pleas with no agreement. ## Dismissals, Discharges, and Federal Supervision All 6 officers convicted at courts-martial were dismissed. Of the 42 enlisted members convicted, 34 (81%) received a punitive discharge: 26 dishonorable and 8 bad-conduct. 46 of the 49 convictions (94%) came from a general court-martial. In federal court, supervised release after prison was ordered for 51 (96%), with a median term of 60 months, and for life in 7 cases (13%). Restitution was ordered for 14 (26%) and a fine for 3 (6%). ## What These Counts Cannot Tell The data counts convictions and sentences, so it leaves out acquittals and dismissed charges. It does not record the facts of a case or the reasons a judge went above or below the guideline range. It cannot show how a court-martial case would have been sentenced in federal court, or the reverse. ### How We Counted Courts-martial with a trial date in 2025 ending in a conviction for sexual abuse of an adult (Article 120 rape, sexual assault, and abusive sexual contact) (49). Federal: people sentenced in fiscal year 2025 under primary sentencing guideline §2A3.1 or §2A3.4 where the statute of conviction shows an adult victim (18 U.S.C. 2241(a)/(b), 2242, 2244) (53), U.S. Sentencing Commission. Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30\. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records. ### What to Keep in Mind **Who is in each set of numbers.** The federal sentencing numbers come from the U.S. Sentencing Commission. They count only people who were convicted and sentenced in federal district court. People whose cases were dismissed or who were acquitted are not in them. The military numbers come from court-martial results, which include acquittals. To compare acquittal or dismissal rates, the federal side uses a different source: the Federal Judicial Center's case data, which counts every defendant whose case ended. **Different cases reach each system.** Federal prosecutors bring a narrow set of cases. In fiscal year 2024, immigration and drug trafficking cases were 59% of everyone sentenced in federal court (36,664 of 61,678). Many crimes that the military prosecutes, such as most assaults, most sexual assaults between adults, and drug use, are usually state crimes for civilians and reach federal court only in special situations, such as on federal land or in Indian Country. A federal case and a court-martial for the same crime can involve different kinds of facts. **No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct.** Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987\. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served. **Military confinement credit and parole.** For military sentences adjudged after 2004, good conduct time is 5 days for each month of confinement, about 16%. Military prisoners can also earn up to 8 more days a month for work and programs and up to 2 days a month for special acts, with a limit of 15 days a month in total. Military prisoners can be considered for parole by their service's clemency and parole board. The military numbers in this post are the confinement adjudged at trial, not the time served. **Military sentences include punishments federal sentences do not.** A court-martial sentence can include a punitive discharge (bad-conduct discharge, dishonorable discharge, or dismissal for officers), reduction in rank, and forfeiture of pay. These have no federal counterpart. A comparison of months of confinement leaves them out. A short confinement term combined with a dishonorable discharge is a heavier sentence than the months alone show. **Time periods.** Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually. **Offense categories do not line up exactly.** Each comparison uses a federal offense group chosen to match the military article as closely as possible (see the crosswalk). Some matches are close; others are partial. The post says which federal guideline or statute was used and why it is not an exact match. ## Related Analysis - [Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/military-sentencing-guidelines-federal-system/) (the background article) - [Federal Prosecution Analysis](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal/) (all federal posts) - [How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal-data-methodology/) (sources and method) - [Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Federal Cases vs. Article 120 Courts-Martial](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal-sexual-abuse-adult-vs-article-120/) (overview) - [Sexual Abuse of an Adult Sentences in 2024: Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal-adult-sexual-abuse-sentences-vs-courts-martial-2024/) (previous or next year) - [Sexual Abuse of an Adult Sentences Since the 2023 Military Sentencing Reform: What the Data Shows So Far](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal-adult-sexual-abuse-2023-sentencing-reform-so-far/) - [Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Federal Sentences vs. Air Force Courts-Martial, 2016–2025](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal-adult-sexual-abuse-vs-air-force/) - [Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Federal Sentences vs. Army Courts-Martial](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal-adult-sexual-abuse-vs-army/) - [Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Federal Sentences vs. Marine Corps Courts-Martial](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal-adult-sexual-abuse-vs-marine-corps/) - [Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Federal Sentences vs. Navy Courts-Martial, 2016–2025](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal-adult-sexual-abuse-vs-navy/) - [Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Courts-Martial at Bremerton vs. Federal Court in the Western District of Washington](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal-adult-sexual-abuse-bremerton-vs-western-district-of-washington/) - [Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Courts-Martial at Joint Base Lewis-McChord vs. Federal Court in the Western District of Washington](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/federal-adult-sexual-abuse-joint-base-lewis-mcchord-vs-western-district-of-washington/) - [Fewer or More? Sexual Assault Charges at Army Courts-Martial, 2021–2025](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-article-120-trend-2021-2025/) (court-martial data) - [Article 120 Sentences in the Army: Confinement and Discharges, 2021–2025](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-article-120-sent-2021-2025/) (court-martial data) - [Fighting an Army Sexual Assault Charge: How Contested Cases Ended](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-article-120-acq-2021-2025/) (court-martial data) - [When Army Accused Plead Guilty to Sexual Assault](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-article-120-plea-2021-2025/) (court-martial data) - [Is Air Force Sexual Assault Prosecution Rising or Falling? Article 120, 2016–2025](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-article-120-trend-2016-2025/) (court-martial data) - [How Much Confinement for an Article 120 Conviction in the Air Force?](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-article-120-sent-2016-2025/) (court-martial data) - [When Air Force Accused Plead Guilty to Sexual Assault](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-article-120-plea-2016-2025/) (court-martial data) - [Is Navy-Marine Corps Sexual Assault Prosecution Rising or Falling? Article 120, 2017–2025](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/navy-marine-corps-article-120-trend-2017-2025/) (court-martial data) - [Article 120 Sentences in the Navy-Marine Corps: Confinement and Discharges, 2017–2025](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/navy-marine-corps-article-120-sent-2017-2025/) (court-martial data) - [Not Guilty Pleas in Navy-Marine Corps Article 120 Cases: What Happened at Trial](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/navy-marine-corps-article-120-acq-2017-2025/) (court-martial data) - [Guilty Pleas in Navy-Marine Corps Sexual Assault Cases: How Often, and What Came Next](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/navy-marine-corps-article-120-plea-2017-2025/) (court-martial data) - [Article 120 (Rape and Sexual Assault): Court-Martial Data and Trends](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/article-120-courts-martial/) (court-martial data) - [Article 120 UCMJ Explained by a Former Special Victim Prosecutor](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/ucmj/article-120-sexual-assault/?ref=bodiesburied.com) (law firm reference page) - [U.S. Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles](https://www.ussc.gov/research/datafiles/commission-datafiles?ref=bodiesburied.com) (source) - [Federal Judicial Center, Integrated Database (criminal defendants)](https://www.fjc.gov/research/idb?ref=bodiesburied.com) (source) **About the author.** Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts *Where All The Bodies Are Buried* and runs the [Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/?ref=bodiesburied.com). This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.