Sexual Abuse of an Adult Sentences in 2022: Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial
In fiscal year 2022, 59 people were sentenced in federal court for sexual abuse of an adult, and the median prison term was 61.5 months. Courts-martial recorded 141 convictions for this offense with 2022 trial dates, and the median confinement was 18 months. At courts-martial, the median after a gui
Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 8 min read
Trends › Federal Prosecution Analysis › Sexual Abuse of an Adult › Sexual Abuse of an Adult: 2022
In brief: In fiscal year 2022, 59 people were sentenced in federal court for sexual abuse of an adult, and the median prison term was 61.5 months. Courts-martial recorded 141 convictions for this offense with 2022 trial dates, and the median confinement was 18 months. At courts-martial, the median after a guilty plea was 9 months, while contested cases ending in conviction had a median of 24.8 months.
This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 59 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal year 2022, compared with court-martial results from this site's Military Trial Results data (updated November 2, 2026). Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. It is part of the Federal Prosecution Analysis series, which builds on Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System. How the numbers were built: How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built.
Federal Sentences for Fiscal Year 2022
The federal group is people sentenced under guideline §2A3.1 or §2A3.4 where the statute of conviction shows an adult victim (18 U.S.C. 2241(a)/(b), 2242, 2244). Fiscal year 2022 covers October 1, 2021 to September 30, 2022.
58 of the 59 (98%) received a prison term, and 1 (2%) received probation only. The median prison term of 61.5 months equals 5.1 years. The spread was wide: a quarter received 157.8 months or more, and a quarter received 18 months or less. These are terms imposed at sentencing, not time served.
80% of this group were in criminal history category I, the lowest, and 2% were in category VI, the highest. Court-martial records have no criminal history field, so this cannot be matched on the military side.
Court-Martial Sentences in 2022
The 141 court-martial convictions were for Article 120 rape, sexual assault, and abusive sexual contact, counted by calendar year of trial. The Army had 88, the Air Force 31, the Navy 11, and the Marine Corps 11.
125 of the 141 convictions with a sentence recorded (89%) included confinement. The median of 18 months is the sentence adjudged at trial, before any clemency or appeal. A quarter of those convicted received 38 months or more.
128 of the 141 (91%) were at a general court-martial.
| Courts-martial, 2022 | Federal court, FY2022 | |
|---|---|---|
| Convictions or people sentenced | 141 | 59 |
| Sentenced to confinement or prison | 89% | 98% |
| Median confinement or prison | 18 months | 61.5 months |
| A quarter received this or more | 38 months | 157.8 months |
| Pleaded guilty | 59 of 141 with a plea recorded (42%) | 88% |
| Mandatory minimum applied | See the caveats | 1 of 58 with the information (2%) |
How Each System Reached Its Convictions
A plea was recorded for all 141 court-martial convictions, and 59 (42%) were guilty pleas. The median confinement after a guilty plea was 9 months (54 cases with confinement). For contested cases ending in conviction, the median was 24.8 months (71 cases with confinement).
In federal court, 52 of the 59 (88%) pleaded guilty and 7 were convicted after a trial. The median prison term was 60 months after a guilty plea and 144 months after a trial. Only 7 people make up the trial figure. Of the federal guilty pleas, 94% had a written plea agreement and 6% were straight pleas.
The records do not show what was charged or agreed in each case. The plea medians describe the groups, not the effect of pleading.
Is the Federal Sentence Inside the Guideline Range?
In fiscal year 2022, 54% (32) of these federal sentences were within the guideline range. Below-range sentences were split evenly: 19% (11) at the government's request and 19% (11) without one. 8% (5) were above the range.
A mandatory minimum prison term applied to 1 person (2%).
Discharges, Supervision, and Payments
109 of the 133 enlisted members convicted at courts-martial (82%) received a punitive discharge. There were 79 dishonorable discharges and 30 bad-conduct discharges. 8 officers were convicted, and 5 were dismissed.
In federal court, 58 people (98%) received supervised release after prison, with a median term of 60 months. Life supervision was ordered for 5 (8%). Fines were ordered for 5 (8%), and restitution for 7 (12%).
Other Years in the Data
Across the full period, there were 901 court-martial convictions with trial dates from 2016 to 2025, at a median confinement of 24 months, and 531 federal sentences in fiscal years 2016 to 2025, at a median prison term of 74 months. The federal table lists each year.
| Fiscal year | People sentenced | Median prison | Pleaded guilty |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 63 | 70 months | 83% |
| 2017 | 58 | 70 months | 95% |
| 2018 | 41 | 60 months | 95% |
| 2019 | 64 | 85.5 months | 86% |
| 2020 | 40 | 102 months | 83% |
| 2021 | 45 | 84 months | 87% |
| 2022 | 59 | 61.5 months | 88% |
| 2023 | 55 | 72 months | 85% |
| 2024 | 53 | 65 months | 81% |
| 2025 | 53 | 90 months | 89% |
Gaps in What Is Recorded
These figures exclude cases that ended in acquittal or dismissal. They cannot describe the evidence, the specific facts, or the reasons a case was pleaded or tried. They also cannot show how a federal judge would have sentenced a court-martial case, or the reverse.
How We Counted
Courts-martial with a trial date in 2022 ending in a conviction for sexual abuse of an adult (Article 120 rape, sexual assault, and abusive sexual contact) (141). Federal: people sentenced in fiscal year 2022 under primary sentencing guideline §2A3.1 or §2A3.4 where the statute of conviction shows an adult victim (18 U.S.C. 2241(a)/(b), 2242, 2244) (59), U.S. Sentencing Commission.
Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records.
What to Keep in Mind
Who is in each set of numbers. The federal sentencing numbers come from the U.S. Sentencing Commission. They count only people who were convicted and sentenced in federal district court. People whose cases were dismissed or who were acquitted are not in them. The military numbers come from court-martial results, which include acquittals. To compare acquittal or dismissal rates, the federal side uses a different source: the Federal Judicial Center's case data, which counts every defendant whose case ended.
Different cases reach each system. Federal prosecutors bring a narrow set of cases. In fiscal year 2024, immigration and drug trafficking cases were 59% of everyone sentenced in federal court (36,664 of 61,678). Many crimes that the military prosecutes, such as most assaults, most sexual assaults between adults, and drug use, are usually state crimes for civilians and reach federal court only in special situations, such as on federal land or in Indian Country. A federal case and a court-martial for the same crime can involve different kinds of facts.
No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct. Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served.
Military confinement credit and parole. For military sentences adjudged after 2004, good conduct time is 5 days for each month of confinement, about 16%. Military prisoners can also earn up to 8 more days a month for work and programs and up to 2 days a month for special acts, with a limit of 15 days a month in total. Military prisoners can be considered for parole by their service's clemency and parole board. The military numbers in this post are the confinement adjudged at trial, not the time served.
Military sentences include punishments federal sentences do not. A court-martial sentence can include a punitive discharge (bad-conduct discharge, dishonorable discharge, or dismissal for officers), reduction in rank, and forfeiture of pay. These have no federal counterpart. A comparison of months of confinement leaves them out. A short confinement term combined with a dishonorable discharge is a heavier sentence than the months alone show.
Time periods. Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually.
Offense categories do not line up exactly. Each comparison uses a federal offense group chosen to match the military article as closely as possible (see the crosswalk). Some matches are close; others are partial. The post says which federal guideline or statute was used and why it is not an exact match.
Related Analysis
- Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System (the background article)
- Federal Prosecution Analysis (all federal posts)
- How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built (sources and method)
- Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Federal Cases vs. Article 120 Courts-Martial (overview)
- Sexual Abuse of an Adult Sentences in 2021: Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial (previous or next year)
- Sexual Abuse of an Adult Sentences in 2023: Federal Court vs. Courts-Martial (previous or next year)
- Sexual Abuse of an Adult Sentences Since the 2023 Military Sentencing Reform: What the Data Shows So Far
- Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Federal Sentences vs. Air Force Courts-Martial, 2016–2025
- Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Federal Sentences vs. Army Courts-Martial
- Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Federal Sentences vs. Marine Corps Courts-Martial
- Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Federal Sentences vs. Navy Courts-Martial, 2016–2025
- Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Courts-Martial at Bremerton vs. Federal Court in the Western District of Washington
- Sexual Abuse of an Adult: Courts-Martial at Joint Base Lewis-McChord vs. Federal Court in the Western District of Washington
- Fewer or More? Sexual Assault Charges at Army Courts-Martial, 2021–2025 (court-martial data)
- Article 120 Sentences in the Army: Confinement and Discharges, 2021–2025 (court-martial data)
- Fighting an Army Sexual Assault Charge: How Contested Cases Ended (court-martial data)
- When Army Accused Plead Guilty to Sexual Assault (court-martial data)
- Is Air Force Sexual Assault Prosecution Rising or Falling? Article 120, 2016–2025 (court-martial data)
- How Much Confinement for an Article 120 Conviction in the Air Force? (court-martial data)
- When Air Force Accused Plead Guilty to Sexual Assault (court-martial data)
- Is Navy-Marine Corps Sexual Assault Prosecution Rising or Falling? Article 120, 2017–2025 (court-martial data)
- Article 120 Sentences in the Navy-Marine Corps: Confinement and Discharges, 2017–2025 (court-martial data)
- Not Guilty Pleas in Navy-Marine Corps Article 120 Cases: What Happened at Trial (court-martial data)
- Guilty Pleas in Navy-Marine Corps Sexual Assault Cases: How Often, and What Came Next (court-martial data)
- Article 120 (Rape and Sexual Assault): Court-Martial Data and Trends (court-martial data)
- Article 120 UCMJ Explained by a Former Special Victim Prosecutor (law firm reference page)
- U.S. Sentencing Commission, Individual Offender Datafiles (source)
- Federal Judicial Center, Integrated Database (criminal defendants) (source)
About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.