NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

Federal Administration of Justice Offense Sentences in the Western District of Oklahoma, FY2016–2025

In the Western District of Oklahoma, 66 people were sentenced for administration of justice offenses in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. 40 of them (61%) received a prison term, and 22 (33%) received probation only. The median prison term was 19.3 months, compared with 12 months across all 94 districts.

· Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › Federal Prosecution Analysis › Federal Sentences in the Western District of Oklahoma, FY201 › Administration of Justice Offense: Western District of Oklahoma

In brief: In the Western District of Oklahoma, 66 people were sentenced for administration of justice offenses in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. 40 of them (61%) received a prison term, and 22 (33%) received probation only. The median prison term was 19.3 months, compared with 12 months across all 94 districts.

Updated November 4, 2026 · Sources: U.S. Sentencing Commission and Federal Judicial Center, fiscal years 2016–2025

This post uses the U.S. Sentencing Commission's records of 66 people sentenced in federal court in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. Acquittals and dismissals come from a second source, the Federal Judicial Center's records of 753,808 federal defendants whose cases ended in fiscal years 2016 to 2025. It is part of the Federal Prosecution Analysis series, which builds on Military Moves Toward Sentencing Guidelines to Mirror the Federal System. How the numbers were built: How the Federal Comparison Data Was Built.

What Cases Fall Under Administration of Justice?

The U.S. Sentencing Commission uses "Administration of Justice" as an offense type for cases that involve the working of the courts and law enforcement. It is a category, not a single statute.

The most common primary guidelines in this district were §2X4.1 (Misprision of Felony) with 24 people, §2A2.4 (Obstructing or Impeding Officers) with 17, §2J1.2 (Obstruction of Justice) with 10, and §2J1.4 (Impersonation) with 2.

They made up 1% of the district's 4,661 sentenced people for the period. The fiscal year starts October 1 of the prior calendar year.

33% Received Probation Only

This offense type had a lower share of prison sentences than most others. 61% of the people (40) were sent to prison, and 33% (22) received probation only, with no prison or other confinement. Across all districts, 72% were sent to prison.

Among those sent to prison, the median prison term was 19.3 months. A quarter received 36 months or more, and a quarter received 12 months or less. The national median for this offense type was 12 months, so the median here was higher. It was lower than the 46 months for all offenses in this district.

Guideline Range and Mandatory Minimums

48% of sentences (31 people) were within the guideline range, which matches the 48% for all districts. 38% (25 people) were below the range without a government request, and 9% (6 people) were below it at the government's request. 5% (3 people) were above the range.

A mandatory minimum prison term applied to 0 of the 55 people with that information recorded (0%).

Pleas and Trials

64 of 66 people (97%) pleaded guilty, and 2 were convicted after a trial. The median prison term was 18.3 months after a guilty plea and 123 months after a trial. The trial figure rests on 2 people, so it cannot show how trial sentences compare with plea sentences in general.

Written plea agreements covered 72% of the guilty pleas, and 20% were straight pleas.

Supervised Release, Fines, and Criminal History

Because many people did not go to prison, fewer were ordered to serve supervised release after prison: 31 people (47%), with a median term of 24 months.

A fine was ordered for 10 people (15%), and restitution for 6 (9%). 51% of the people were in the lowest criminal history category I, and 18% were in the highest (VI). Court-martial records have no criminal history field.

Yearly Counts Are Small

28 people were sentenced in fiscal years 2016 to 2019, and 38 in fiscal years 2020 to 2025. Each year had between 3 and 12 people.

The table shows a median of 210 months for 2023, but that year had 5 people, and the yearly medians elsewhere run from 12 to 36 months. Counts this small do not show a trend.

Fiscal yearPeople sentencedMedian prisonPleaded guilty
2016712 months7 of 7
2017717.5 months7 of 7
2018912 months9 of 9
2019516 months5 of 5
2020916 months9 of 9
2021436 months4 of 4
2022523.8 months5 of 5
20235210 months4 of 5
20241221 months92%
2025321 months3 of 3

What the Records Leave Out

Anyone whose case ended without a conviction is not counted, so acquittals and dismissals cannot be read from this data.

The terms shown are those ordered by the court, and release dates or time served are not included.

The installations in the data, Altus AFB, Fort Sill, and Tinker AFB, are in the district. Their courts-martial are tried in military courts, and these federal totals stand alone.

How We Counted

Everyone sentenced in federal court in the Western District of Oklahoma (U.S. Sentencing Commission district label "Oklahoma West") in fiscal years 2016 to 2025 whose offense type was "Administration of Justice" (66). Offense types are the Commission's OFFGUIDE categories.

Federal fiscal years run from October 1 to September 30. No person, judge, or lawyer is identified in any of these records.

What to Keep in Mind

No parole in federal prison; credit for good conduct. Federal prison has no parole for crimes committed on or after November 1, 1987. A federal prisoner can earn up to 54 days of good conduct credit for each year of the sentence the judge imposed, which is about 15%. Some federal prisoners can also earn First Step Act time credits, but many offenses make a person ineligible. The numbers in this post are the sentences judges imposed, not the time people actually served.

Federal supervised release. Most federal prison sentences are followed by a term of supervised release that the judge sets as part of the sentence. A person who violates it can be sent back to prison. A court-martial cannot sentence anyone to supervision after release. Military parole and mandatory supervised release are decided later by a board, not by the judge at trial.

Who decides the sentence, and under what rules. Federal judges sentence every federal case. They must calculate the Sentencing Guidelines range, which is advisory, and must impose any mandatory minimum the statute requires unless an exception applies. In courts-martial, the accused could choose sentencing by members until the rules changed. For cases in which every guilty finding is for an offense committed after December 27, 2023, a military judge sentences alone, within sentencing parameters. Courts-martial tried in 2024 and later include both old-rule and new-rule cases, and the data cannot tell them apart.

Time periods. Federal numbers are by federal fiscal year (October 1 to September 30), based on the sentencing date. The military numbers are by trial date. Neither source has the date of the offense, so a change in law shows up in either data set gradually.

How life sentences and "time served" are counted. In the federal numbers, a life sentence is counted as 470 months, and any other sentence longer than 470 months is counted as just under 470 months. A sentence of "time served" is counted as one day (0.03 months). Averages are affected by these rules; medians much less.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top