How Camp Pendleton, California Handled Drug Cases (Article 112a), 2024–2026
Of the 14 drug courts-martial under Article 112a at Camp Pendleton, California from 2024 to 2026, 13 records list a plea, and only 1 of those was contested (8%). Across Navy and Marine Corps Article 112a cases, 38% were contested.
Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 5 min read
Trends › By Installation › Camp Pendleton, California › Article 112a, 2024–2026
Short answer: Of the 14 drug courts-martial under Article 112a at Camp Pendleton, California from 2024 to 2026, 13 records list a plea, and only 1 of those was contested (8%). Across Navy and Marine Corps Article 112a cases, 38% were contested. 13 of the 14 cases were special courts-martial, and 58% of convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge.
Guilty Pleas in Almost Every Case
12 accused pleaded guilty, and 1 entered a not-guilty or mixed plea. That makes 8% contested among the 13 records with a plea. In Navy and Marine Corps Article 112a cases overall, the contested share was 38%.
A contested case is one where the accused pleads not guilty to at least one charge. The records do not show the terms of any plea agreement.
Special Courts-Martial Were the Usual Court Level
1 case was a general court-martial and 13 were special courts-martial. The general share was 7%, compared with 19% across Navy and Marine Corps Article 112a cases.
A special court-martial can impose a bad-conduct discharge but not a dishonorable discharge, and it caps confinement at one year. A general court-martial can impose any lawful sentence.
What Sentences Followed?
12 cases ended in a conviction, and 9 of those sentences included confinement. The median confinement was 3 months. Across Navy and Marine Corps Article 112a cases, it was 4 months. A quarter of the confinement terms here were 4 months or longer.
7 of the 12 convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge (58%). All 7 were bad-conduct discharges, and 0 were dishonorable. Across Navy and Marine Corps Article 112a cases in 2024–2026, the share was 54%. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation.
Many Cases Had Only the Drug Charge
7 of the 14 cases charged Article 112a by itself. Across all Navy and Marine Corps Article 112a cases in 2024–2026, 67 of 121 did. Article 92 (orders violation) was the most common other charge, in 5 cases.
Article 131b (obstruction), Article 82 (solicitation), Article 106a (wearing unauthorized insignia), and Article 128 (assault) appeared in 1 case each. Sentences are as adjudged at trial and cover every charge in the case.
Rank of the Accused
Junior enlisted members (E-1 to E-4) were 62% of the accused, and NCOs were 38%. No officers were charged. Across Navy and Marine Corps Article 112a cases, junior enlisted members were 61%, about the same share.
Trials From 2024 Through Mid-2026
The trials ran from February 2024 to June 2026: 6 in 2024, 4 in 2025, and 4 in 2026. The 2026 count covers only part of the year. These 14 cases were 10% of the 142 courts-martial at Camp Pendleton, California in 2024–2026.
New Rules in This Period
Since December 28, 2023, special trial counsel, not commanders, decide whether to prosecute covered offenses such as sexual assault, domestic violence, and murder. When every guilty finding is for an offense after December 27, 2023, the military judge sets the sentence under new sentencing parameters.
Both rules depend on the offense date. The records give only trial dates, so these trials include cases under the old rules and the new ones. The records also leave out the evidence and any case handled outside a court-martial.
For what the offense covers and how it is defended, see Article 112a on the law firm's website. Dates and sources for the law changes: UCMJ change timeline.
How We Counted
Courts-martial tried at Camp Pendleton, California in 2024–2026 that charged Article 112a (14 cases), compared with every Navy and Marine Corps case charging Article 112a in those years.
Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.
Related Analysis
- Camp Pendleton, California: Court-Martial Data and Trends (hub)
- Article 112a (Wrongful Use, Possession of Controlled Substances): Court-Martial Data and Trends (hub)
- By Installation (hub)
- What Was Tried at Camp Pendleton, California, 2019–2023? 291 Courts-Martial
- Camp Pendleton, California, 2017–2018: Charges, Verdicts, and Sentences in 149 Cases
- Inside 142 Courts-Martial at Camp Pendleton, California, 2024–2026
- Article 112a at Camp Pendleton, California Before and After 2019
- Is Navy-Marine Corps Drug Prosecution Rising or Falling? Article 112a, 2017–2025
- S1 E33: Dismissing the Camp Pendleton Case (podcast, members)
- Article 112a explained on the law firm's website
- Search every case in Military Trial Results (members)
Military Judges Who Presided Over Article 112a Cases at Camp Pendleton, California, 2024–2026
- Cory Carver
- Alexander Douvas
- Todd Gaston
- Matthew Harris
- Mishonda Mosley
- Jason Pfeil
- Derek Poteet
- David Segraves
- Aran Walsh
Names and links only. Each judge's record of pleas, findings, and sentences is on their Know Your Judge page, part of the Court-Martial Characters membership.
Compare: federal court. Federal Law Has No Crime of Drug Use: How Article 112a Cases Compare · Drug Distribution and Importation: Federal vs. Court-Martial Sentences, 2016–2025
About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.