Articles 128 and 133 in the Same Case: What the Records Show
Courts-martial that charged assault with Article 133 (conduct unbecoming) had a median confinement of 3 months, shorter than the 6 months for all Article 128 cases. In 33 Army, Navy, and Marine Corps cases from 2013–2026, the accused contested the charges more often.
Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 5 min read
Trends › By Offense › Article 128 › With Article 133
Short answer: Courts-martial that charged assault with Article 133 (conduct unbecoming) had a median confinement of 3 months, shorter than the 6 months for all Article 128 cases. In 33 Army, Navy, and Marine Corps cases from 2013–2026, the accused contested the charges more often. Only 3 of 17 contested cases that reached a verdict ended in a full acquittal (18%), compared with 40% for all assault cases.
Most of the Accused Were Officers
Article 133 covers conduct unbecoming an officer. In this group, 29 of the accused were officers or warrant officers, 1 was an NCO, and 0 were junior enlisted (E-1 to E-4). For all Army, Navy, and Marine Corps cases charging Article 128, the comparison group in this post, 58% of the accused were junior enlisted. The sentence figures in this post mostly describe officers.
The 33 courts-martial were tried from June 2013 through September 2026. No year had more than 7 cases, the count for 2021. There were 0 cases in 2015 and 0 in 2016. Most other years had between 1 and 4. The 2026 count of 1 covers part of the year.
More Contested Cases, Fewer Full Acquittals
A case is contested when the accused pleads not guilty to at least one charge. The plea is listed in 31 records: 17 were contested and 14 were guilty pleas. The contested share was 55%, compared with 40% for all Article 128 cases.
Of the 17 contested cases that reached a verdict, 3 ended in a full acquittal (18%), compared with 40% in the comparison group. Another 8 (47%) ended in a partial acquittal, with a not-guilty finding on at least one charge or specification and a guilty finding on another. There were few contested cases, so each verdict changes these percentages by a large amount.
Shorter Confinement, With Some Long Sentences
Of 29 convictions, 18 included confinement. The median confinement was 3 months, compared with 6 months for all Article 128 cases. A quarter of the sentences were 9 months or longer.
11 convictions (38%) included no confinement, compared with 15% in the comparison group. Another 11 (38%) were under 6 months, the same as the 38% for all assault cases. 5 convictions (17%) were 6 months to 1 year, compared with 20%. No conviction was more than 1 year and under 5 years, compared with 18% of Article 128 convictions.
2 convictions (7%) were 5 years or more, and 1 sentence was for life. In total, only 2 of 29 convictions (7%) were longer than one year, compared with 27%. These are adjudged sentences, covering every charge in the case and set before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal.
| Adjudged confinement | Convictions | Share here | Share, all Army, Navy, and Marine Corps cases charging Article 128 |
|---|---|---|---|
| No confinement | 11 | 38% | 15% |
| Under 6 months | 11 | 38% | 38% |
| 6 months to 1 year | 5 | 17% | 20% |
| More than 1 year, under 5 years | 0 | 0% | 18% |
| 5 years or more | 2 | 7% | 9% |
Most Cases Were General Courts-Martial
Of the 33 cases, 29 were general courts-martial and 3 were special courts-martial. The court level is not listed for 1. The general court-martial share was 91%, compared with 62% for all Article 128 cases.
A general court-martial can impose any lawful sentence, including dismissal for an officer. A special court-martial caps confinement at one year and cannot impose a dishonorable discharge. The records show a high share of general courts-martial and a short median confinement. They do not explain that combination.
Other Charges in These Cases
For all Article 128 cases, 670 of 2,155 charged assault alone. Here, Article 120 (sexual assault) was charged in 10 cases, Article 134 (general article) in 7, Article 115 (malingering before 2019; communicating threats since) in 4, and Article 92 (orders violation) in 3.
When assault is charged together with sexual assault, the assault charge can describe part of the same incident. The sentence covers the whole case.
Installations
Fort Bragg and Norfolk, Virginia had 4 cases each. Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, Wheeler Army Airfield, and Mayport, Florida had 2 each. These installations account for 42% of the 33 cases. Larger installations try more cases of every kind, so these small counts do not by themselves say anything about one base.
What the Records Do Not Show
Since December 28, 2023, special trial counsel, not commanders, decide whether to prosecute covered offenses such as sexual assault. Whether that rule applied depends on the offense date, which the records do not give.
For officers, the punitive equivalent of a discharge is a dismissal. The figures here do not include dismissal counts for this pairing, and administrative action outside a court-martial is not included either. The records also do not include the evidence, the plea terms, or nonjudicial punishment, and they do not explain any result.
For what the offense covers and how it is defended, see Article 128 on the law firm's website. Dates and sources for the law changes: UCMJ change timeline.
How We Counted
Army, Navy, and Marine Corps courts-martial that charged both Article 128 and Article 133 (33 cases). Air Force cases are left out because Air Force records rarely list the charges in acquittals.
Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.
Related Analysis
- Article 128 (Assault): Court-Martial Data and Trends (hub)
- Article 133 (Conduct Unbecoming an Officer): Court-Martial Data and Trends (hub)
- Assault Plus Orders Violation: Courts-Martial Charging Articles 128 and 92
- Assault Plus General Article: Courts-Martial Charging Articles 128 and 134
- When Article 128 and Article 80 Are Charged Together, How Do Cases End?
- Army Article 128 Cases by the Numbers, 2021–2025
- Fewer or More? Assault Charges at Air Force Courts-Martial, 2016–2025
- Article 128 explained on the law firm's website
- Search every case in Military Trial Results (members)
Compare: federal court. Aggravated Assault: Federal Sentences vs. Article 128 Courts-Martial, 2016–2025
About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.