> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.bodiesburied.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# October 2022 at Army Courts-Martial: 42 Cases
- URL: https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-courts-martial-october-2022/
- Published: 2026-10-28T08:11:14.000Z
- Updated: 2026-10-30T08:06:44.000Z
- Description: The Army tried 42 courts-martial in October 2022. Of 17 contested cases that reached a verdict, 10 ended in a full acquittal (59%), much higher than the 38% for the Army across 2022. Article 120 (sexual assault) was charged in 33% of cases, compared with 26% for the year.
- Author: Jocelyn C. Stewart
- Tags: Understanding Trends, Army

[Trends](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/) › [By Year](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/by-year/) › October 2022

**Short answer:** The Army tried 42 courts-martial in October 2022\. Of 17 contested cases that reached a verdict, 10 ended in a full acquittal (59%), much higher than the 38% for the Army across 2022\. Article 120 (sexual assault) was charged in 33% of cases, compared with 26% for the year.

Based on 42 cases · October 2022 · Army records · data updated October 24, 2026

## Full Acquittals in Most Contested Cases

A contested case is one where the accused pleads not guilty to at least one charge. October 2022 had 17 contested cases that reached a verdict. Of those, 10 ended in a full acquittal. The full-acquittal rate was 59%, much higher than the 38% for the year.

Another 6 contested cases ended in a partial acquittal: not guilty of at least one charge or specification and guilty of another. Army results report findings for each charge, so partial acquittals are recorded.

## A Higher Contested Share

Pleas are recorded in 41 of the 42 cases: 24 guilty pleas and 17 contested cases. The contested share was 41%, compared with 36% for the Army in 2022.

Of the 24 guilty pleas, 23 are recorded with a plea agreement and 1 has no entry. Army records show whether an agreement existed, not its terms.

## Sexual Assault Was the Most Common Charge

All 42 records list charges. A case is counted once under each article. Article 120 (rape and sexual assault) was charged in 14 cases. Article 128b (domestic violence) was charged in 19% of cases, compared with 13%. Article 120b (child sexual abuse) was charged in 14%, compared with 8%. Article 80 (attempts) was charged in 12%, compared with 6%.

Article 128 (assault) was charged much less often than for the year: 5 cases, or 12%, compared with 27%. Article 112a (drug offenses) was also charged less often: 10%, compared with 13%.

| UCMJ Article                                                                                                                                       | Cases | Share here | Share, the Army for all of 2022 |
| -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | ---------- | ------------------------------- |
| [Art. 120](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/ucmj/article-120-sexual-assault/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Rape and sexual assault                            | 14    | 33%        | 26%                             |
| [Art. 92](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-92/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Failure to obey order or regulation         | 9     | 21%        | 18%                             |
| [Art. 128b](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/ucmj/article-128b-domestic-violence/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Domestic violence                             | 8     | 19%        | 13%                             |
| [Art. 134](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-134/?ref=bodiesburied.com) General article                           | 8     | 19%        | 21%                             |
| [Art. 120b](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-120b/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Rape and sexual assault of a child      | 6     | 14%        | 8%                              |
| [Art. 80](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-80/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Attempts                                    | 5     | 12%        | 6%                              |
| [Art. 128](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-128/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Assault                                   | 5     | 12%        | 27%                             |
| [Art. 112a](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/ucmj/article-112a-drug-offenses/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Wrongful use, possession of controlled substances | 4     | 10%        | 13%                             |

## Sexual Assault Had the Lowest Conviction Rate

Of the 14 cases charging Article 120, 7 ended in a conviction on that article (50%). The median confinement for those convictions was 1.6 years. That was the lowest conviction rate among the most common charges.

All 8 cases charging Article 134 (general article) ended in a conviction on that article, with a median of 2.4 years. Article 128b cases ended in a conviction in 7 of 8 (median 5 months). Article 92 (orders violations) cases ended in a conviction in 7 of 9 (median 3 months). A case can include a conviction on one article and an acquittal on another, so these rows overlap.

| Article                                     | Cases charging it | Convicted of it (share) | Median confinement when convicted of it |
| ------------------------------------------- | ----------------- | ----------------------- | --------------------------------------- |
| Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault            | 14                | 7 (50%)                 | 1.6 years                               |
| Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation | 9                 | 7 (7 of 9)              | 3 months                                |
| Art. 128b Domestic violence                 | 8                 | 7 (7 of 8)              | 5 months                                |
| Art. 134 General article                    | 8                 | 8 (8 of 8)              | 2.4 years                               |

## General Courts-Martial and Long Terms

General courts-martial made up 37 of the 42 cases (88%), compared with 75% for the year. A general court-martial can impose any lawful sentence, including a dishonorable discharge. A special court-martial is limited to one year of confinement.

Of 32 convictions, 84% included confinement. The median confinement was 6 months, the same as for the Army in 2022\. A quarter of terms were 2.3 years or longer. More than one year was given in 11 of 32 convictions (34%), compared with 27% for the year. Terms of more than 1 year but under 5 years made up 28%, compared with 20%.

These are adjudged sentences. They cover all charges in the case and come before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal.

| Adjudged confinement            | Convictions | Share here | Share, the Army for all of 2022 |
| ------------------------------- | ----------- | ---------- | ------------------------------- |
| No confinement                  | 5           | 16%        | 16%                             |
| Under 6 months                  | 13          | 41%        | 41%                             |
| 6 months to 1 year              | 3           | 9%         | 16%                             |
| More than 1 year, under 5 years | 9           | 28%        | 20%                             |
| 5 years or more                 | 2           | 6%         | 7%                              |

## Discharges After Conviction

Of 28 convicted enlisted members, 21 received a punitive discharge: 13 bad-conduct discharges and 8 dishonorable discharges. For the Army in 2022, the share was 76%. Of 3 convicted officers or warrant officers, 2 were dismissed. A sentence without a punitive discharge can still lead to an administrative separation.

## Rank, Forum, and Installation

The accused were 21 junior enlisted members, 16 NCOs, and 4 officers. This group was more senior than the Army for the year.

A military judge alone decided 31 cases. Of cases with a forum listed, members heard 24%: 8 enlisted panels and 2 officer panels. Members heard 9 of the 16 contested cases with a forum listed (56%). The accused usually chooses the forum.

Joint Base Lewis-McChord and Fort Bragg tried 5 cases each, and Fort Hood, Fort Bliss, and Fort Stewart tried 4 each. Together these installations account for 52% of the month. Larger installations try more cases of every kind.

## Compared With October 2021

October 2021 had 36 cases. October 2022 had 42\. The contested share was 41%, compared with 28% in October 2021\. Full acquittals in contested cases that reached a verdict were 10 of 17, compared with 3 of 10\. The general court-martial share was 88%, compared with 64%. Enlisted punitive discharges were 75%, compared with 67%. The median confinement was 6 months, compared with 7 months. Monthly groups are small, and a few cases can change these figures.

|                                     | October 2021 | October 2022 |
| ----------------------------------- | ------------ | ------------ |
| Cases                               | 36           | 42           |
| Contested (of pleas recorded)       | 28%          | 41%          |
| Full acquittals (decided contested) | 3 of 10      | 10 of 17     |
| Convictions with confinement        | 82%          | 84%          |
| Median confinement                  | 7 months     | 6 months     |
| Punitive discharge (enlisted)       | 67%          | 75%          |
| General courts-martial              | 64%          | 88%          |

## What the Records Leave Out

Only cases that reached a courtroom are included. Nonjudicial punishment, administrative separations, the evidence, and the plea terms are not in the records.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: [UCMJ change timeline](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/ucmj-change-timeline/).

### How We Counted

Army courts-martial with a trial date in October 2022 (42 cases), compared with the whole year.

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in [Military Trial Results](https://www.bodiesburied.com/military-trial-results/), data updated October 24, 2026\. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: [how this data was built](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/how-the-military-trial-results-data-was-built/). Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

## Related Analysis

- [Army Courts-Martial: Data and Trends](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-courts-martial/) (hub)
- [By Year](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/by-year/) (hub)
- [Army Courts-Martial, September 2022: The Month in Review](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-courts-martial-september-2022/) (previous / next)
- [November 2022 at Army Courts-Martial: 46 Cases](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-courts-martial-november-2022/) (previous / next)
- [The Army Court-Martial Year, 2022](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-courts-martial-2022-year-in-review/) (the whole year)
- [April 2023 at Army Courts-Martial: 49 Cases](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-courts-martial-april-2023/)
- [April 2024 at Army Courts-Martial: 46 Cases](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-courts-martial-april-2024/)
- [Army Courts-Martial, August 2025: The Month in Review](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-courts-martial-august-2025/)
- [Army Courts-Martial, December 2024: The Month in Review](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-courts-martial-december-2024/)
- [Search every case in Military Trial Results](https://www.bodiesburied.com/military-trial-results/) (members)

← Previous: [Army Courts-Martial, September 2022: The Month in Review](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-courts-martial-september-2022/)Next: [November 2022 at Army Courts-Martial: 46 Cases](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/army-courts-martial-november-2022/) →

**About the author.** Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts *Where All The Bodies Are Buried* and runs the [Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/?ref=bodiesburied.com). This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.