NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

What the Army Tried in July 2025

The Army tried 36 courts-martial in July 2025. Convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge less often than across the year: 62%, compared with 73% for the Army in 2025. Only 2 of those discharges were dishonorable.

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › By Year › July 2025

Short answer: The Army tried 36 courts-martial in July 2025. Convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge less often than across the year: 62%, compared with 73% for the Army in 2025. Only 2 of those discharges were dishonorable. The median confinement was 6 months, compared with 8 months for the year.

Based on 36 cases · July 2025 · Army records · data updated October 24, 2026

Bad-Conduct Discharges, Few Dishonorable

Of enlisted convictions, 62% included a punitive discharge: 16 bad-conduct discharges and 2 dishonorable discharges. Only a general court-martial can impose a dishonorable discharge. A special court-martial can also impose a bad-conduct discharge.

Of 3 convicted officers or warrant officers, 2 were dismissed. Dismissal is the officer form of a punitive discharge. A member whose sentence has no punitive discharge can still be separated administratively, and these records do not show it.

Confinement Shorter Than the Yearly Median

Of the 32 convictions, 84% included confinement. Half of the terms were 6 months or less. A quarter were 1.2 years or more.

By length, 13 convictions (41%) carried under 6 months, compared with 36% for 2025. Another 6 (19%) carried 6 months to 1 year, compared with 15%. Terms over one year were given in 8 of 32 convictions (25%), compared with 30%. Of those, 3 (9%) were 5 years or more. Another 5 convictions (16%) carried no confinement, compared with 19%.

Sentences differed by court level. The median confinement was 9 months at general courts-martial (23 cases) and 3 months at special courts-martial (11 cases). A special court-martial cannot impose more than one year. The court level is not listed for 2 cases. All sentences are as adjudged at trial for every charge, before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal.

Adjudged confinementConvictionsShare hereShare, the Army for all of 2025
No confinement516%19%
Under 6 months1341%36%
6 months to 1 year619%15%
More than 1 year, under 5 years516%18%
5 years or more39%11%

Assault and Offenses Against Superiors

Charge lists exist for 33 of the 36 cases. Each article counts once per case. Article 128 (assault) was charged in 8 cases (24%), compared with 19% for the year. Article 128b (domestic violence) was charged in 21%, lower than its 26% share for the year.

Offenses involving superiors were charged more often than in the full year. Article 91 (insubordinate conduct toward NCO) was charged in 9% of cases, compared with 1% for 2025. Article 89 (disrespect toward superior officer; assault of superior officer) was charged in 9%, compared with 2%. Article 86 (AWOL) was charged in 12%, compared with 3%. Article 80 (attempts) was charged in 12%, compared with 7%. Article 121 (larceny) was charged in 9%, compared with 6%.

UCMJ ArticleCasesShare hereShare, the Army for all of 2025
Art. 128 Assault824%19%
Art. 128b Domestic violence721%26%
Art. 86 AWOL412%3%
Art. 80 Attempts412%7%
Art. 91 Insubordinate conduct toward NCO39%1%
Art. 89 Disrespect toward superior officer; assault of superior officer39%2%
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation39%8%
Art. 121 Larceny39%6%

Pleas and Contested Results

Pleas are recorded for 34 of the 36 cases: 25 guilty pleas and 9 contested cases. A contested case is one where the accused pleaded not guilty to at least one charge. The contested share was 26%, compared with 20% for the Army in 2025. It was 29% at general courts-martial and 18% at special courts-martial.

Of the 25 guilty pleas, 24 have a recorded plea agreement and 1 has no entry. Army records do not show what those agreements said. Of the contested cases that reached a verdict, 3 of 9 ended in a full acquittal.

Rank and Forum

The accused were 22 junior enlisted members (E-1 to E-4), 11 NCOs (E-5 to E-9), and 3 officers or warrant officers. This group was more junior than the Army as a whole in 2025, where 50% were junior enlisted.

A military judge alone decided guilt in 28 of 33 cases with a forum listed (85%). Enlisted panels heard 5. The accused usually chooses between a judge and members. Most judge-alone cases are guilty pleas.

Among cases with a court level listed, general courts-martial made up 68%, about the same as the 66% for the year.

Compared With July 2024

Both months had 36 cases. The contested share was 26%, compared with 28% in July 2024. Full acquittals in contested cases that reached a verdict were 3 of 9, compared with 5 of 10. The median confinement was 6 months, compared with 4 months. Punitive discharges for enlisted members were 62%, compared with 57%. The general court-martial share was 68%, compared with 61%.

Monthly groups are small, so a few cases can change any of these figures.

July 2024July 2025
Cases3636
Contested (of pleas recorded)28%26%
Full acquittals (decided contested)5 of 103 of 9
Convictions with confinement87%84%
Median confinement4 months6 months
Punitive discharge (enlisted)57%62%
General courts-martial61%68%

The Post-2023 Rules

Since December 28, 2023, special trial counsel, not commanders, decide whether to prosecute covered offenses. These include sexual assault, domestic violence, and murder. When every guilty finding in a case is for an offense after December 27, 2023, the military judge sets the sentence within new parameters.

Both rules depend on the offense date. The records give only trial dates. For that reason, trials in 2025 can include cases under either set of rules.

Installations and What Is Left Out

Fort Bliss, Vilseck (Europe), and Fort Stewart tried 3 cases each. Fort Hood and Fort Campbell tried 2 each. Together these installations account for 36% of the month. Larger installations try more cases overall.

The records show charges, pleas, findings, and sentences. They do not show evidence, plea terms, or conduct handled outside a court-martial.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.

How We Counted

Army courts-martial with a trial date in July 2025 (36 cases), compared with the whole year.

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top