NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

Army Courts-Martial, February 2024: The Month in Review

Sentences in the Army's 29 courts-martial of February 2024 were longer than for the year. The median confinement was 1.2 years, compared with 6 months for the Army across 2024. Article 120 (rape and sexual assault) appeared in 31% of cases, compared with 15% for the year.

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › By Year › February 2024

Short answer: Sentences in the Army's 29 courts-martial of February 2024 were longer than for the year. The median confinement was 1.2 years, compared with 6 months for the Army across 2024. Article 120 (rape and sexual assault) appeared in 31% of cases, compared with 15% for the year. 41% of cases were contested, compared with 27%.

Based on 29 cases · February 2024 · Army records · data updated October 24, 2026

Median Confinement Was Higher Than for the Year

Of 26 convictions, 88% included confinement. The median confinement was 1.2 years, and a quarter of sentences were 3.5 years or more. Across the Army in 2024, the median was 6 months.

12 of 26 convictions (46%) included more than one year of confinement, compared with 28% for the year. 9 sentences were more than 1 year but under 5 years (35%), compared with 21%. 3 sentences (12%) were 5 years or more, compared with 7%. Only 31% were under 6 months, compared with 43% Army-wide.

A general court-martial is the only level that can adjudge more than a year. These are adjudged sentences for every charge in each case, before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal.

Adjudged confinementConvictionsShare hereShare, the Army for all of 2024
No confinement312%13%
Under 6 months831%43%
6 months to 1 year312%15%
More than 1 year, under 5 years935%21%
5 years or more312%7%

Sexual Assault, Assault, and Orders Violations

All 29 records list charges, with each article counted once per case. Article 120, Article 128 (assault), and Article 128b (domestic violence) each appeared in 9 cases (31%). Article 120 was higher than its 15% share for 2024. Articles 128 and 128b were each higher than their 23% shares for the year.

Article 92 (failure to obey order or regulation) appeared in 24% of cases, compared with 12%. Article 115 (communicating threats) appeared in 14%, compared with 4%. Article 134 (general article) appeared in 10%, compared with 21%.

UCMJ ArticleCasesShare hereShare, the Army for all of 2024
Art. 128 Assault931%23%
Art. 128b Domestic violence931%23%
Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault931%15%
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation724%12%
Art. 115 Communicating threats414%4%
Art. 131b Obstructing justice310%6%
Art. 134 General article310%21%
Art. 120b Rape and sexual assault of a child310%9%

Results and Sentences by Charge

All 9 cases charging Article 128 ended in a conviction on that article. The median confinement for those convictions was 3 years. Article 128b cases ended in a conviction on that article in 8 of 9 cases, with a median of 2 years.

Article 120 cases ended in a conviction on that article in 5 of 9 cases, the lowest among the top charges. The median confinement for those convictions was 5 years. One case can include a conviction on one article and an acquittal on another, so the rows overlap.

ArticleCases charging itConvicted of it (share)Median confinement when convicted of it
Art. 128 Assault99 (9 of 9)3 years
Art. 128b Domestic violence98 (8 of 9)2 years
Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault95 (5 of 9)5 years

Contested Cases and Partial Acquittals

There were 17 guilty pleas and 12 contested cases (not-guilty or mixed pleas). Of the 17 guilty pleas, 16 are recorded with a plea agreement and 1 has no entry. The records show only that an agreement existed.

Of 12 contested cases that reached a verdict, 3 ended in a full acquittal (25%), compared with 37% for the year. The other 9 ended in a partial acquittal: not guilty of some charges or specifications and guilty of others. Army results record findings charge by charge.

Officers and Punitive Discharges

Officers made up 17% of the accused, with junior enlisted members (E-1 to E-4) at 48% and NCOs at 34%. Across the Army in 2024, junior enlisted were 53%. Of 5 convicted officers or warrant officers, 3 were dismissed.

A punitive discharge followed 71% of enlisted convictions (8 bad-conduct and 7 dishonorable), about the same as the 72% for the year. A sentence without one does not rule out a later administrative separation.

General Courts-Martial and Members

The month had 24 general and 4 special courts-martial, with 1 not listed. General courts-martial made up 86% of cases with a court level listed, compared with 75% for the year. A special court-martial caps confinement at one year and cannot adjudge a dishonorable discharge.

A military judge alone decided 21 of 29 cases (72%). Members heard 8: 7 enlisted panels and 1 officer panel. Among contested cases, members heard 8 of 12 (67%). The accused usually chooses the forum.

Compared With February 2023, and Law Changes

February 2023 had 32 cases. The contested share went from 22% to 41%. The median confinement went from 6 months to 1.2 years. Full acquittals in contested cases that reached a verdict went from 3 of 7 to 3 of 12. The general court-martial share went from 69% to 86%. Punitive discharges for enlisted members were about the same: 70% and 71%.

Since December 28, 2023, special trial counsel, not commanders, decide whether to prosecute covered offenses such as sexual assault, domestic violence, and murder. Military judges sentence under new parameters when all guilty findings involve offenses after December 27, 2023. These changes took effect in the same period. Both depend on offense dates, which the records do not give, so the data cannot show whether they affected these numbers.

February 2023February 2024
Cases3229
Contested (of pleas recorded)22%41%
Full acquittals (decided contested)3 of 73 of 12
Convictions with confinement86%88%
Median confinement6 months1.2 years
Punitive discharge (enlisted)70%71%
General courts-martial69%86%

Installations and What the Records Do Not Show

Fort Knox, Fort Bragg, and Fort Polk tried 3 cases each, and Fort Bliss and Fort Carson 2 each. Together they had 45% of the month's cases. Larger installations try more cases of all kinds.

Only courtroom outcomes appear here. Cases handled by nonjudicial punishment, administrative separation, or no action are not included. The records do not describe the evidence or the plea terms.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.

How We Counted

Army courts-martial with a trial date in February 2024 (29 cases), compared with the whole year.

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top