NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

What the Army Tried in December 2022

The Army tried 35 courts-martial in December 2022, and most ended with a guilty plea. Only 3 of the 11 contested cases that reached a verdict ended in a full acquittal (27%), compared with 38% for the Army across 2022.

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › By Year › December 2022

Short answer: The Army tried 35 courts-martial in December 2022, and most ended with a guilty plea. Only 3 of the 11 contested cases that reached a verdict ended in a full acquittal (27%), compared with 38% for the Army across 2022. 69% of convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge, compared with 76% for the year.

Based on 35 cases · December 2022 · Army records · data updated October 24, 2026

Fewer Full Acquittals Than the Year

A case counts as contested when the accused pleads not guilty to at least one charge, whether to everything or as a mixed plea. December 2022 had 11 such cases with a verdict, and 3 ended in a full acquittal (27%). Across the Army for all of 2022, the full acquittal rate in contested cases that reached a verdict was 38%.

Another 4 contested cases (36%) ended in a partial acquittal: not guilty of at least one charge or specification and guilty of another. Army results record findings charge by charge, so partial acquittals are common in Army records.

Most Cases Were Guilty Pleas

Of the 35 accused, 24 pleaded guilty and 11 contested at least one charge. The contested share was 31%, lower than the 36% for the Army across 2022.

Every one of the 24 guilty pleas is recorded with a plea agreement. Army records note only that an agreement existed. They do not say what it promised, capped, or required.

Assault, Drugs, and the General Article

Charge lists exist for all 35 cases, and a case charging several articles counts once under each. Article 134, the general article, was the most common charge, at 26%, compared with 21% for the year. Article 112a (wrongful use, possession of controlled substances) appeared in 17% of cases, compared with 13% for 2022.

Article 128 (assault) was charged in 23% of cases, compared with 27% for the year. Article 120 (rape and sexual assault) appeared in 11%, compared with 26% across 2022. Article 120b (rape and sexual assault of a child) and Article 121 (larceny) each appeared in 11%, compared with 8% each for the year.

UCMJ ArticleCasesShare hereShare, the Army for all of 2022
Art. 134 General article926%21%
Art. 128 Assault823%27%
Art. 112a Wrongful use, possession of controlled substances617%13%
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation617%18%
Art. 128b Domestic violence411%13%
Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault411%26%
Art. 120b Rape and sexual assault of a child411%8%
Art. 121 Larceny411%8%

Results for the Top Charges

Of the 8 cases charging Article 128, 7 ended in a conviction on that article, and the median confinement for those convictions was 4 months. Article 134 cases less often ended in a conviction on that article: 5 of 9 cases, with a median of 1.3 years.

These rows can overlap. One case can include a conviction under one article and an acquittal under another.

ArticleCases charging itConvicted of it (share)Median confinement when convicted of it
Art. 134 General article95 (5 of 9)1.3 years
Art. 128 Assault87 (7 of 8)4 months

Discharges and Dismissals

A punitive discharge means a bad-conduct or dishonorable discharge for an enlisted member, and dismissal for an officer. Among 29 convicted enlisted members, 20 received one (69%), and 5 of those were dishonorable. The Army-wide figure for 2022 was 76%.

The month also had 3 convicted officers or warrant officers, and 2 were dismissed. A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation, which these records do not track.

Confinement

Of 32 convictions, 26 included confinement. The median confinement was 6 months, the same as for the Army over all of 2022. A quarter of sentences were 1 year or longer.

Sentences longer than one year were less common: 6 of 32 convictions (19%), compared with 27% for the year. Only a general court-martial can adjudge more than a year. A special court-martial is capped at one year. All figures are adjudged sentences covering every charge in the case, before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal.

Adjudged confinementConvictionsShare hereShare, the Army for all of 2022
No confinement619%16%
Under 6 months1341%41%
6 months to 1 year722%16%
More than 1 year, under 5 years412%20%
5 years or more26%7%

Compared With December 2021

December 2021 had 27 cases. The contested share went from 41% to 31%. Full acquittals in contested cases that reached a verdict went from 2 of 11 to 3 of 11. The median confinement was 6 months in both months, and the general court-martial share was 74% in both.

Punitive discharges for convicted enlisted members went from 79% to 69%. Convictions with confinement went from 88% to 81%. In groups this small, a few cases can change a percentage.

December 2021December 2022
Cases2735
Contested (of pleas recorded)41%31%
Full acquittals (decided contested)2 of 113 of 11
Convictions with confinement88%81%
Median confinement6 months6 months
Punitive discharge (enlisted)79%69%
General courts-martial74%74%

Rank, Installations, and Who Decided Guilt

Junior enlisted members (E-1 to E-4) made up 54% of the accused, about the same as the 57% for the Army in 2022. NCOs were 34% and officers 11%. General courts-martial, the level that can impose long confinement and a dishonorable discharge, accounted for 26 of the 35 cases (74%).

Fort Bragg tried 7 cases, Fort Bliss and Fort Campbell 3 each, and Fort Drum and Joint Base Lewis-McChord 2 each. Together they had 49% of the month's cases. Larger installations try more cases overall, so a count alone says little about any one installation.

A military judge alone decided guilt in 30 of 35 cases (86%). Members heard 5: 4 enlisted panels and 1 officer panel. All 5 were contested cases. The accused usually chooses the forum, and most judge-alone cases are guilty pleas.

What the Records Do Not Show

These records cover the trial only: charges, pleas, findings, and the adjudged sentence. They give trial dates, not offense dates. They do not describe the evidence or the terms of plea agreements. They do not cover nonjudicial punishment or administrative separations.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.

How We Counted

Army courts-martial with a trial date in December 2022 (35 cases), compared with the whole year.

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top