> ## Content Index
> Fetch the complete content index at: https://www.bodiesburied.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover other available public pages before exploring further.

# October 2016 at Air Force Courts-Martial: 33 Cases
- URL: https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-courts-martial-october-2016/
- Published: 2026-10-28T08:12:01.000Z
- Updated: 2026-10-30T08:07:23.000Z
- Description: The Air Force tried 33 courts-martial in October 2016, and only 8 of 25 convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge (32%), compared with 54% for the Air Force in all of 2016. General courts-martial were only 24% of the month's cases.
- Author: Jocelyn C. Stewart
- Tags: Understanding Trends, Air Force

[Trends](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/) › [By Year](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/by-year/) › October 2016

**Short answer:** The Air Force tried 33 courts-martial in October 2016, and only 8 of 25 convicted enlisted members received a punitive discharge (32%), compared with 54% for the Air Force in all of 2016\. General courts-martial were only 24% of the month's cases. Drug charges under Article 112a appeared in 56% of cases with a charge list.

Based on 33 cases · October 2016 · Air Force records · data updated October 24, 2026

## Few Punitive Discharges

For an enlisted member, a punitive discharge is a bad-conduct discharge or a dishonorable discharge. This month, 8 of 25 convicted enlisted members received one (32%), lower than the 54% across the Air Force in 2016\. Only 2 of the 8 were dishonorable discharges.

No officers were among the accused this month. A member sentenced without a punitive discharge can still face administrative separation, which these records do not cover.

## Most Cases Were Special Courts-Martial

Only 8 of the 33 cases were general courts-martial (24%), compared with 47% for the Air Force over the year. The rest were special courts-martial.

The court level sets the maximum sentence. A special court-martial caps confinement at one year and cannot impose a dishonorable discharge. A general court-martial can impose any lawful sentence.

## Few Long Sentences

Of 25 convictions, 20 included confinement. The median confinement was 4 months, the same as the Air Force median for 2016\. A quarter of terms were 6 months or more.

Terms under 6 months were part of 14 convictions (56%), compared with 44% for the year. Only 2 of 25 convictions (8%) included more than one year, compared with 20% service-wide. Both of those were 5 years or more. No conviction included a term of more than 1 year and under 5 years, compared with 13% of Air Force convictions in 2016.

These are adjudged sentences for every charge in a case, before clemency, appeal, or any plea-agreement cap.

| Adjudged confinement            | Convictions | Share here | Share, the Air Force for all of 2016 |
| ------------------------------- | ----------- | ---------- | ------------------------------------ |
| No confinement                  | 5           | 20%        | 15%                                  |
| Under 6 months                  | 14          | 56%        | 44%                                  |
| 6 months to 1 year              | 4           | 16%        | 20%                                  |
| More than 1 year, under 5 years | 0           | 0%         | 13%                                  |
| 5 years or more                 | 2           | 8%         | 7%                                   |

## Drug and General-Article Charges Were Most Common

Charge lists exist for 25 of the 33 cases, and each article counts once per case. Article 112a, wrongful use or possession of controlled substances, appeared in 14 (56%), higher than the 46% for the year. Article 134, the general article, appeared in 9 (36%), compared with 27%.

Article 92, failure to obey an order or regulation, appeared in 6 cases (24%), and assault under Article 128 in 5 (20%), both higher than their annual shares of 16% and 11%. Larceny under Article 121 appeared in 4 (16%), and Article 107, false official statements, in 3.

Article 120, rape and sexual assault, and Article 108, covering loss, damage, or destruction of military property, each appeared in 2 cases (8%). Across the service, Article 108 was charged in 2% of cases.

| UCMJ Article                                                                                                                                       | Cases | Share here | Share, the Air Force for all of 2016 |
| -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | ---------- | ------------------------------------ |
| [Art. 112a](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/ucmj/article-112a-drug-offenses/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Wrongful use, possession of controlled substances | 14    | 56%        | 46%                                  |
| [Art. 134](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-134/?ref=bodiesburied.com) General article                           | 9     | 36%        | 27%                                  |
| [Art. 92](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-92/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Failure to obey order or regulation         | 6     | 24%        | 16%                                  |
| [Art. 128](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-128/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Assault                                   | 5     | 20%        | 11%                                  |
| [Art. 121](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-121/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Larceny                                   | 4     | 16%        | 12%                                  |
| [Art. 107](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/practice-areas/court-martial/article-107/?ref=bodiesburied.com) False official statements                 | 3     | 12%        | 10%                                  |
| [Art. 120](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/ucmj/article-120-sexual-assault/?ref=bodiesburied.com) Rape and sexual assault                            | 2     | 8%         | 7%                                   |
| Art. 108 Military property; loss, damage, destruction                                                                                              | 2     | 8%         | 2%                                   |

## Sentences for the 2 Leading Charges

All 14 cases charging Article 112a ended in a conviction under that article, and the median confinement was 4 months. All 9 cases charging Article 134 ended in a conviction under it, and the median was 1 year.

Because Air Force records list charges mainly when a case ends in conviction, these counts describe sentences rather than conviction rates.

| Article                                                     | Cases charging it | Convicted of it | Median confinement when convicted of it |
| ----------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------- | --------------- | --------------------------------------- |
| Art. 112a Wrongful use, possession of controlled substances | 14                | 14              | 4 months                                |
| Art. 134 General article                                    | 9                 | 9               | 1 year                                  |

## More Full Acquittals Than for the Year

A full acquittal means not guilty of all charges. Full acquittals were 8 of the 33 cases (24%), compared with 18% for the Air Force in 2016\. Records from 2016 to 2019 rarely list a guilty plea, so this rate counts all cases, not only contested cases. The data for this month cannot produce a rate for contested cases alone.

## Officer Panels Were More Common Than Enlisted Panels

The accused usually chooses whether a military judge alone or a panel of members decides guilt. A military judge alone decided 17 cases, officer panels 11, and enlisted panels 5\. Members decided 48% of cases, close to the 45% for the year. Guilty pleas are rarely listed for this period, so the records cannot show how many of the panel cases were contested.

## Rank and Installations

Junior enlisted members (E-1 to E-4) made up 67% of the accused and NCOs 33%. Across the Air Force, 65% were junior enlisted.

Whiteman AFB, Missouri, and JB Pearl Harbor-Hickam, Hawaii, tried 3 cases each. FE Warren AFB, Wyoming, Travis AFB, California, and Ramstein AB, Germany, tried 2 each. Together these five accounted for 36% of the month's cases. Larger installations try more cases of every kind.

## The Old Rules and the Gaps

These trials came before the Military Justice Act of 2016 took effect on January 1, 2019\. That law later brought fixed panel sizes, judge-alone special courts-martial capped at six months, and written plea agreements. None of those changes applied here. The records do not include offense dates, evidence, plea terms, nonjudicial punishment, or administrative separations.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: [UCMJ change timeline](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/ucmj-change-timeline/).

### How We Counted

Air Force courts-martial with a trial date in October 2016 (33 cases), compared with the whole year.

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in [Military Trial Results](https://www.bodiesburied.com/military-trial-results/), data updated October 24, 2026\. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: [how this data was built](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/how-the-military-trial-results-data-was-built/). Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

## Related Analysis

- [Air Force Courts-Martial: Data and Trends](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-courts-martial/) (hub)
- [By Year](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/by-year/) (hub)
- [September 2016 at Air Force Courts-Martial: 33 Cases](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-courts-martial-september-2016/) (previous / next)
- [What the Air Force Tried in November 2016](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-courts-martial-november-2016/) (previous / next)
- [The Air Force Court-Martial Year, 2016](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-courts-martial-2016-year-in-review/) (the whole year)
- [Air Force Courts-Martial, April 2018: The Month in Review](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-courts-martial-april-2018/)
- [Air Force Courts-Martial, April 2019: The Month in Review](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-courts-martial-april-2019/)
- [Air Force Courts-Martial, August 2018: The Month in Review](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-courts-martial-august-2018/)
- [Air Force Courts-Martial, August 2020: The Month in Review](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-courts-martial-august-2020/)
- [Search every case in Military Trial Results](https://www.bodiesburied.com/military-trial-results/) (members)

← Previous: [September 2016 at Air Force Courts-Martial: 33 Cases](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-courts-martial-september-2016/)Next: [What the Air Force Tried in November 2016](https://www.bodiesburied.com/trends/air-force-courts-martial-november-2016/) →

**About the author.** Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts *Where All The Bodies Are Buried* and runs the [Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart](https://www.ucmj-defender.com/?ref=bodiesburied.com). This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.