NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Understanding Trends

Air Force Courts-Martial, June 2025: The Month in Review

Air Force records show 23 courts-martial in June 2025. Of cases with a recorded plea, 29% were contested, compared with 41% for the Air Force across 2025. Of convicted enlisted members, 53% received a punitive discharge, compared with 60% for the year.

Understanding Trends in Military Practice · 6 min read

Trends › By Year › June 2025

Short answer: Air Force records show 23 courts-martial in June 2025. Of cases with a recorded plea, 29% were contested, compared with 41% for the Air Force across 2025. Of convicted enlisted members, 53% received a punitive discharge, compared with 60% for the year.

Based on 23 cases · June 2025 · Air Force records · data updated October 24, 2026

Fewer Contested Cases Than the Year

Plea information appears in 17 of the 23 records, and 12 of those were guilty pleas. The other 5 were not-guilty or mixed pleas. A case is contested when the accused pleads not guilty to at least one charge, and the government must then prove it.

The contested share was 29%, lower than the 41% across the Air Force in 2025. Of the 5 contested cases that reached a verdict, 1 ended in a full acquittal.

Larceny and Other Sexual Misconduct Were More Common

Charges are listed for 22 of the 23 cases, and an article is counted once per case. Article 121, larceny, appeared in 3 cases (14%), compared with 5% for the year. Article 120c, other sexual misconduct, appeared in 2 cases (9%), compared with 3%.

Article 134, the general article, was the most common charge, in 5 cases (23%), the same as its annual share. Domestic violence under Article 128b appeared in 4 cases (18%), about the same as the 16% for 2025. Article 112a drug charges appeared in 3 cases (14%), lower than the 21% for the year. Article 92 also appeared in 3 cases.

Rape and sexual assault under Article 120 appeared in 2 cases (9%), lower than its annual share of 14%. Assault under Article 128 also appeared in 2 cases (9%), lower than its annual share of 12%.

UCMJ ArticleCasesShare hereShare, the Air Force for all of 2025
Art. 134 General article523%23%
Art. 128b Domestic violence418%16%
Art. 92 Failure to obey order or regulation314%17%
Art. 112a Wrongful use, possession of controlled substances314%21%
Art. 121 Larceny314%5%
Art. 120 Rape and sexual assault29%14%
Art. 128 Assault29%12%
Art. 120c Other sexual misconduct29%3%

No Sentence of 5 Years or More

Of 20 convictions, 16 included confinement (80%). The median confinement was 6 months, the same as the Air Force median for 2025. A quarter of the terms were 1 year or longer.

Terms longer than one year came in 3 of 20 convictions (15%), compared with 27% across the Air Force. No conviction included 5 years or more. Across the Air Force that year, 11% of convictions did. Terms under 6 months were the most common, in 8 convictions (40%).

These are sentences as adjudged at trial, covering every charge. They come before any plea-agreement cap, clemency, or appeal.

Adjudged confinementConvictionsShare hereShare, the Air Force for all of 2025
No confinement420%12%
Under 6 months840%43%
6 months to 1 year525%18%
More than 1 year, under 5 years315%15%
5 years or more00%11%

General and Special Courts-Martial

Only a general court-martial can adjudge more than one year of confinement or a dishonorable discharge. A special court-martial is capped at one year. This month had 12 general courts-martial (52%, compared with 51% for the year) and 11 special courts-martial.

The median confinement was 8 months at general courts-martial and 3 months at special courts-martial. Contested pleas were recorded in 3 of 9 general cases and 2 of 8 special cases with a plea listed.

Punitive Discharges

A bad-conduct or dishonorable discharge followed 53% of enlisted convictions: 5 bad-conduct and 5 dishonorable. The Air Force rate for 2025 was 60%. The month's 1 convicted officer or warrant officer was dismissed.

A sentence without a punitive discharge does not rule out a later administrative separation. Administrative separations are not in these records.

Most Cases Were Decided Without a Panel

The accused usually chooses whether a military judge alone or a panel of members decides guilt. The forum is listed in all 23 cases. A military judge alone decided 18 (78%). Members heard the other 5, all with enlisted panels.

Most guilty pleas go before a military judge alone, so this split follows the number of guilty pleas.

Rank and Installations

Junior enlisted members (E-1 to E-4) made up 61% of the accused, NCOs 35%, and officers 4%. Across the Air Force in 2025, junior enlisted members were 60%.

Fairchild AFB, Washington, Keesler AFB, Mississippi, Scott AFB, Illinois, Robins AFB, Georgia, and Kadena AB, Japan, each tried 2 cases. Together they account for 43% of the month's cases. Larger installations try more cases of all kinds, so these counts show little about any one base.

Compared With June 2024

June 2024 had 24 cases, and June 2025 had 23. The contested share went from 50% to 29%. Full acquittals in contested cases that reached a verdict went from 5 of 11 to 1 of 5. The median confinement went from 1 year to 6 months.

Punitive discharges for enlisted members went from 73% to 53%. General courts-martial went from 83% to 52% of cases. Convictions with confinement went from 68% to 80%. Groups this small can change with a few cases, so the comparison shows direction only.

June 2024June 2025
Cases2423
Contested (of pleas recorded)50%29%
Full acquittals (decided contested)5 of 111 of 5
Convictions with confinement68%80%
Median confinement1 year6 months
Punitive discharge (enlisted)73%53%
General courts-martial83%52%

Rule Changes and Limits of the Records

Since December 28, 2023, special trial counsel decide whether to prosecute covered offenses such as sexual assault, domestic violence, and murder. Military judges set sentences within new parameters when every guilty finding is for an offense after December 27, 2023. The records list trial dates, not offense dates. They cannot separate old-rule cases from new-rule cases or show whether the changes affected any figure. The records also do not include nonjudicial punishment, administrative separations, the evidence, or plea terms.

Dates and sources for the law changes mentioned here: UCMJ change timeline.

How We Counted

Air Force courts-martial with a trial date in June 2025 (23 cases), compared with the whole year.

Source: public court-martial records (Article 140a, UCMJ) in Military Trial Results, data updated October 24, 2026. Definitions, sources, and known gaps: how this data was built. Errors: content@bodiesburied.com.

About the author. Jocelyn C. Stewart is a retired Army JAG with more than 24 years of trying courts-martial and more than 200 jury trials. She hosts Where All The Bodies Are Buried and runs the Law Office of Jocelyn C. Stewart. This analysis is for education and information only. It is not legal advice, and every case is different.

↑ Top