NewKnow Your Judge: the court-martial record of 294 military judges → NewLearn Your Lawyer: the court-martial record of 335 military lawyers →
Where All The Bodies Are Buried
Title IX

Too Drunk to Consent? Why Campus Rules and New York's Rape Law Draw Different Lines

New York may change how its rape law treats voluntary intoxication after the Cornell case. Campus consent rules already treat heavy drinking as possible incapacity, and the campus bar is lower.

October 26, 2026 · 3 min read

By Jocelyn C. Stewart

New York is moving to change how its rape law treats a person who chose to drink or take drugs. The push grew out of the Cornell Jane Doe case. For accused students, the bigger point is that schools already use a broader rule.

The law today. Under N.Y. Penal Law § 130.00(6), a person is "mentally incapacitated" by drugs or alcohol only when the substance was given to them without their consent. Critics call that the voluntary intoxication loophole.

The push to close it. Gov. Kathy Hochul has said she backs changing the law, according to The Associated Press, via WSB-TV, Fox News and CBS6 Albany. Versions of the fix have passed the state Senate but stalled in the Assembly, as City & State and CBS6 Albany report. The Assembly has formed a working group, with recommendations due before the end of 2026.

The Cornell link. Jane Doe's lawsuit alleges she was drugged and pressured into using alcohol and drugs before she was sexually assaulted at the Chi Phi house in 2024, as the AP, via NBC New York, and Fox News both report. Those are allegations. The Tompkins County district attorney first declined to bring charges; Fox News reports he said her statement did not show she was intoxicated against her will, forced or unconscious. Lawyers for two of the men denied to the AP that their clients took part in any assault.

Where the reports differ. Fox News counts 19 states with a rule like New York's. The AP puts the number at nearly two dozen.

Why it matters to you. A campus panel does not apply § 130.00(6). It applies a consent policy that already treats heavy voluntary intoxication as possible incapacity. No charges does not mean not responsible.

Her law firm's website explains how the military's highest court separated consent from incapacity in United States v. Mendoza.

More Episodes You Might Like

↑ Top