October 27 Newsletter

This week: three stories in Allegedly…, Galvin comes back from C.A.A.F., a Sidebar from a courtroom motion, and three of your questions answered.

Allegedly…

Three stories this week: a Cornell anonymity ruling, a livestreamer facing a criminal case and a civil suit at the same time, and Congress rewriting its own harassment rules.

Objection: Galvin — Called It

On 19 October 2026, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces issued a summary disposition in United States v. Galvin, No. 26-0300/AF, without a full opinion.

Sidebar

From S4 H3: OpenAI CEO Dismissal: "In this case, we learned that she, the alleging victim, had submitted to an interview by the government's psych expert. What? It was at that point we raised a motion to the court and we asked that she be required to submit to an interview and examination by our expert."

Asked And Answered

Q – After a not-guilty verdict, what happens to the accused? Is he moved, or does he stay under the same commander?

Q – If a witness refuses to take the oath or to testify, can the judge hold that witness in contempt?

Q – In the Watson case, why was the accused put in pretrial confinement, and where is he being held?